Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Google's Pending September Update

I have seen some changes in geo...

         

rishic

2:49 pm on Oct 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hello People,

Have been waiting for google's pending update but didn't get any on that. From last two days I have noticed extreme changes in search results for same google domain (like .com or .de or .nl etc.) with different interface language selected (like hl=de or hl=en or hl=nl). When you change the interface language the whole bunch of results are different.

Is this the actual update this time? Enabling the geo centric data which google wanted to implement for better localization? If yes (and if someone else is also seeing this change) then may be we can all identify the parameters of this new change, like language, servers in geographical locations or extensions (.de, .nl etc.)

-- rishi

2by4

5:49 am on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



"who are not SEO crazy like us link home with the words (for example) 'Our Dogs'. Have seen it a million times."

I haven't, I've seen 'home' a million times, I've seen top image links to / a million times.

But the other stuff, almost every instance of that I've seen is for seo.

I'm not saying this has any meaning, and I'm not saying it's wrong per se, but it has been and continues to be abused by seos, and what seos abuse is what will get targetted at some point, whether it's dupe content, dodgy subdomains, link farms, passing PR, whatever.

I don't think this is a key element in what we're looking at, although it could be an element. Keep in mind it's not me you have to convince, it's google.

Whatever it is, this new thing we're seeing here is spectacular, I was starting to get bored with seo, now it's gotten interesting again, LOL...

[edited by: 2by4 at 5:51 am (utc) on Oct. 12, 2005]

reseller

5:50 am on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Garya

>>Maybe they will erace me from this world.<<

We are deeply shocked hearing the sudden drop of Garya from the index. May "God Bless His Soul" ;-)

Ok. No need to panic. Nothing is settled yet and you could be on top of the serps again, hopefully. Who knows what will happen next during such Bacon Polenta Update?

Powdork

6:22 am on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



We are deeply shocked hearing the sudden drop of Garya from the index. May "God Bless His Soul"
He is survived by a .com, a .net, a .org and three subdomains that will miss him dearly.;)

Don't worry, GoogleGuy will stroll in here any minute and tell you that everything will be ok as soon as they fold in some new data, stir it up and bake at 375. Everything should settle in a matter of weeks, months...

reseller

6:49 am on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Yippee

>>In the technology news this weekend, alarms have sounded regarding a cross-scripting vulnerability some company discovered regarding G's AdWords.<<

I see something about the same published today on threadwatch.org . Very interesting readings!

Powdork

6:55 am on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



You mean the vulnerability that was fixed within 30 hours?

cristinita

7:25 am on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I believe that the new SERPs on 66.102.7.* are slowly but surely vanishing. They're no longer on 64.233.189.**, although still also visible on 216.239.63.** and 216.239.53.**

Sorry if these SERPs were the preferred choice for any of you...better luck next time...this is becoming more and more like gambling in Vegas

PS: even on 66.102.7.** they`re coming and going

[edited by: cristinita at 7:27 am (utc) on Oct. 12, 2005]

TerrCan123

7:26 am on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



This is Update Katrina for me, I lost it all. Wish they would say what is up, I haven't linked out lately to any bad sites so that can't be the cause.

Dayo_UK

8:01 am on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)



Yep it looks like 66.102.7.147 results are being faded out - they did look like a throwback.

But the new results seen on the other dcs - which definetly look more progressive are spreading.

Anyone with Canonical url probs seeing better crawling - I desperately need a better crawl.

soapystar

8:46 am on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



something else im playing.......internal trust rank....come up with an internal algo to determine the most important/quality pages within a site and dampen any internal pages not voted for by the trusted pages....

bang goes your doorway pages....arghhhhh!

Armi

12:15 pm on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



"I believe that the new SERPs on 66.102.7.* are slowly but surely vanishing. They're no longer on 64.233.189.**, 2

On 64.233.189.** they are back!

cristinita

12:44 pm on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



yes, they're back in that DC but this situation has been like this since sunday (even they spread to other DCs on sunday evening)but i see no indication they should propagate any further....maybe just some internal testing at google

JuniorOptimizer

12:48 pm on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



How would any of your realistically know what data center is going to spread?

dfre

12:58 pm on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



How would any of your realistically know what data center is going to spread?

I was thinking the same thing. There is probably only one person on this board that would know...and he ain't talkin.

The current situation reminds me of Allegra..err Bourbon..can't remember which, but there were 2 sets of serps running side by side for some time (weeks), with datacenters bouncing around between the two.

stefano

1:10 pm on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



i think 64.233.167.99 *may* spread its serps.

i'm not checking many keywords, but for what i've seen, 64.233.167.99 has good results while 64.233.161.99, for example, has more spam engines.

wiseapple

1:11 pm on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The big question to ask - why the two? Each seem to serve a distinct group of site.

On the below sites:

64.233.189.104
216.239.53.99
66.102.7.99
66.102.7.104
216.239.53.104
216.239.63.104
66.102.7.105
66.102.7.147
216.239.63.104
216.239.63.99

I have the feeling they have either lifted filters, lessened penalties, or testing reinclusion requests. We have a site that has not seen daylight since Feb. 2nd. On the above DCs, we are back in the game.

The above DCs are live and serving different minor areas (Earthlink Search, PeoplePC Search, So. Cal?).

From what I am hearing, on the other DCs, people are experiencing the same thing. Sites are coming back from nowhere. (Can someone confirm?)

I guess we will have to wait it out. We can end up with the following:

- Everything reverts - none of the DCs are used.
- One set of DCs wins out.
- Combination of DCs wins out.
- None wins out and a new setting of testing begins.

Hopefully in the end our site will come back. It would be a cruel joke to see it rise and then move back to page 800.

JuniorOptimizer

1:19 pm on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



A cruel joke indeed. And I just checked and I'm in all of those data centers Wiseapple just mentioned. Whatever filter is on my website is removed there.

I think they're testing the keywords.

stefano

1:25 pm on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member




On the below sites:

64.233.189.104
216.239.53.99
66.102.7.99
66.102.7.104
216.239.53.104
216.239.63.104
66.102.7.105
66.102.7.147
216.239.63.104
216.239.63.99

i see a lot of spam from here (here means Italy, btw).

DumpedbyG

1:26 pm on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Sites are coming back from nowhere. (Can someone confirm?)

Hip; our site which got lost 16 June is back in those DC's. Actually some of our page came back already about 3 weeks ago, but the page with www/non-www problems are coming back now.

Dayo_UK

1:31 pm on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)



>>>From what I am hearing, on the other DCs, people are experiencing the same thing. Sites are coming back from nowhere. (Can someone confirm?)

Yep to an extent

Which is stressing me out a bit - as I have non-www problems apparently but I have seen improvements on some dcs where others haven't and others are seeing improvements on others dcs for the same problem where I haven't.

However, it does not look like a fix of the non-www problem - more of a lessening of the effect.

And my site is nowhere near fixed in any dc - just slightly more encouraging in some.

Yippee

1:31 pm on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Reseller,

The time line when the Adwords phishing discovery happened and when it hit the news coincide with when the pages got dropped and when the DC's started dancing (9/21 and 10/9). Everyone I spoke to says the pages they lost had Adsense one them, which of course displayed Adwords. Also, as I said in my earlier post, unless the page is PR6 it will not appear on the first few pages of SERPs if it the page has Adsense/Adwords on it. Do a search on power keywords and go through the serps, you wont see adwords on the first few pages unless it has a PR6. In our case, we had an ad in the side nav include, which was included on virtually every page.

dfre

1:39 pm on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Everyone I spoke to says the pages they lost had Adsense one them, which of course displayed Adwords.

I lost rankings on 9/22 and I don't have adsense on any of my pages.

The duplicate content filter theory seemed to make sense in my case. I had some www vs. non-www issues along with some case sensitive url problems that I think contributed.

jmdb71

1:45 pm on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



thats what i think my problem was: the www vs non-www issues, even though the shortened urls had been permanently redirected a long time ago. Apparently, google has a problem dealing with this.

Its looking bleak..

Yippee

1:50 pm on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



On the same token, we do not have duplicate content pages but yet vanished... What we did discover was our non-www was not setup, and that was fixed asap.

Dayo_UK

2:13 pm on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)



Yippee

The non-www is much more likely than your Adwords/Adsense theory.

Lets hope they are working on it.

Dayo

newwebster

2:35 pm on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Looks like they are just bringing in any usable data from the supplemental index. These have been set up as temporary feeder centers:
64.233.189.104
216.239.53.99
66.102.7.99
66.102.7.104
216.239.53.104
216.239.63.104
66.102.7.105
66.102.7.147
216.239.63.104
216.239.63.99

Data is being brought in from these centers and is causing ranking fluctuations on the other centers as the ranking criteria is being applied to the new (old) data. The reason for multiple feeder data centers is for speed

Once they have processed through they may be purging a lot of supplementals.

Just my guess based on the early observations

jmdb71

2:36 pm on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I did my 301 redirect code right, didnt I?

Options +FollowSymLinks
RewriteEngine On
RewriteBase /
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST}!^www\.tools4flooring\.com [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*) [tools4flooring.com...] [L,R=301]

This was in my .htaccess to take care of any shortened urls that had been indexed. They are still in there now, and my good high-ranking pages are gone.

I had thought yahoo had a 301 problem, but that was nothing!

reseller

2:55 pm on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Maybe GOOD NEWS for sites hit by Allegra and 22nd July 2005.

I see very promising developments. Any feedback from fellow members whose sites were hit as above?

Thanks a bunch ;-)

Dayo_UK

2:59 pm on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)



>>>I see very promising developments.

Where?

On the DC we have been discussing :( - well it looks a bit messy at the moment reseller.

cristinita

3:05 pm on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



newwebster,

if those DCs "have been set up as temporary feeder centers", what's the reason for those DCs to show some differences in ranking vs others? SERPs in those DCs are different as if Google had released/applied certain "filters/penalties", according to your opion will those changes expand to other DCs once the feeding process is over, or will the SERPs continue in line with those of the

Sorry if the question does not make sense...

PS: I dissapeared on 9/22, have no redirect problem, never had but do have adsense in all my pages, and I'm back in those DCs mentioned, although I'm the only one back out of the four sites which fell to positions +100 for the keywords that I follow

mjtaylor

3:06 pm on Oct 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



64.233.167.147 .. if those spread, as stefano suggested, I am tickled ... gives my sites same or better results ...

66.102.7.147 ... would like to believe these are a throw*away* ... not sure what you meant by those being a "throwback," Dayo ... my sites have never had such poor positions.

64.233.167.99 ... I can live with that ...
64.233.161.99 ... looks the same to me ... and very acceptable from my point of view ...

And my current default G search sees an improvement in some more competitive kws ...

In fact, at the moment, I can't find a data center I *don't* like except 66.102.7.147 ... and I am going to stop looking!

Cheers, MJ

This 939 message thread spans 32 pages: 939