Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
Have been waiting for google's pending update but didn't get any on that. From last two days I have noticed extreme changes in search results for same google domain (like .com or .de or .nl etc.) with different interface language selected (like hl=de or hl=en or hl=nl). When you change the interface language the whole bunch of results are different.
Is this the actual update this time? Enabling the geo centric data which google wanted to implement for better localization? If yes (and if someone else is also seeing this change) then may be we can all identify the parameters of this new change, like language, servers in geographical locations or extensions (.de, .nl etc.)
-- rishi
A particular well trafficed site only lost rankings related to hotel and real estate terms. All other terms are basically intact with rankings still in close proximity to those before this update began. It is really strange that out of the over 14,000 search phrases it is found under each month that only the hotel and real estate related phrases disappeared.
So, I would like to take back all the good things I said about the Google engineers. Clearly they have no idea what they are doing (as our site is back to the bottom).
If things change over the weekend, then I will again spew my praises for their efforts.
In the meantime - Google has failed.
One of the few pages that comes up is a page that hasn't existed since Jan :(
Tell me again.. Is it once a decade that google looks at supplementals? At this rate I'll be on medicare by the time my site comes back.
ps. I look forward to working with G over the holidays. I'll need a good nut cracker - which they are.
That is what I am seeing now.
Also up and down like a yoyo all week. Today results on site name ranged from 1.7 million to 4.9 million.
Guess lots going on.
Exactly. Results in my market segment are back to what they looked liked on 9/22/05 and that's not good. Earlier today it looked like we were going back to pre 9/22/05 results and things were looking up. Now they look like crap again. Looks to me like they tried to fix their mess, failed and went back to the crappy 9/22/05 results.
I don't ask for much but it would be nice to be #1 for at least my own (unique) domain name. Right now Google is a waste of time.
-- T
I'm afraid the testing is over and these are the new (old) results we have to live with for now.
Did anyone get their original September positions back?
Before 9/22/05: 500+ Page 1 Rankings for critical keywords that I had held for almost four years as a PR5 site.
Today: 20 Page 1 Rankings for critical keywords.
Looks like Page Rank doesn't mean crap anymore. I checked some of the sites that took my place and a number of them have a PR of 0-2.
-- T
I think G was happy with some of the 6-8 test 'binaries' they have been fooling with.
They are going to incorporate the best of those new ones and do a compile/link tonight and push them out to all DCs over the weekend.
I'm looking forward to a major traffic increase Sunday evening.
I am beginning to wonder if, in addition to other filter testing, Google is applying some kind of test via trust rank. Many think it is already part of the filter.
I am seeing alot of sites over 5 years or considered authority sites not budge whatosever in any of these DC's. Any one here have anything contrary to this? Perhaps part of this is determining the seed sites and then evaluatiing from there?
This sounds just like the exact discussion that was going on when I left in about April of 2003. I guess things don't change much. The dance still goes on.
However,two quick questions about words being used in these discussions that weren't used two years ago.
1. What are supplementals?
2. What are scrapers?
Thanks, bigace
Possibilities I can think of are slight site interlinking, reciprocal linking or internal duplicate pages. I suspect our linking isn't any worse than other sites in the top ten and it's themed with similar product sites.
What is similar to the other site that was bumped was internal duplicate pages. With our sites using Oscommerce there are two URL paths to each product page, one direct and with the category ID in it. By the time you add the shared SSL you end up with a total of 4 URL paths to the same product page.
I am beginning to suspect this is the problem which is shame as it's going to be hard to modify around this. It would almost be better for Google not to spider dynamic sites if this is going to cause a filter to be applied.
Anyone else having problems with Oscommerce the last few days?