Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
aliszka, I got your point the first time you said it, you haven't said anything new for I don't know how many postings, do you like the sound your fingers make when they hit the keys or something? Right, google is broken, I got it.
$1 becomes 10, 10 becomes 100, 100 becomes 1000, 1000 becomes 10000, and so on till you die. Modesty is not a virtue in business, at least not in capitalism. The problem here is that G is darn good at it, and we all envy them. To quote you, "very simple!"
[edited by: Yippee at 11:50 pm (utc) on Nov. 3, 2005]
As for others seeing your perspective, I suggest you approach your argument differently. The folks here are extremely unyokel (lol, meaning intelligent) and know a few things. Maybe the whole world is wrong and you are right. That could be the case I suppose.
[edited by: Yippee at 11:57 pm (utc) on Nov. 3, 2005]
Anyway, since this thread is just drifting pointlessly, no worries, might as well waste some of my own bytes.
"I have succeeded in my eyes!"
What you're arguing has been argued far better in past threads, far more in depth, and with actual reasoning attached to the points. Look them up, you might learn something.
Amazing how easy it is to be come addicted! - having said that there has been some interesting and educational food for thought in the various comments IMO.
Greed - don't we all want more? Isn't that why we're here?
"Amazing how easy it is to be come addicted!"
For me it's not addiction so much as not wanting to read through 400 postings all at once, I tried that a few days ago, that was even worse than just keeping up with it, though it is too bad matt cutts has not blessed the world with the pronouncement of jagger 3 live.
But, as usual, picked up some interesting stuff scattered here and there in the thread.
If I may, I would like to ask an invigorating question regarding the SERPs that came back. Did they come back because they had a penalty specifically on them that was lifted, or because of the new algo/update recalculating them and giving them the respect they deserve? Penalty or Reranked?
Reason I ask this is because we did take some steps to fix things (like reinclusion request, undo G sitemaps, fix non-www, etc), and now can't accurately guess whether it's our actions or new algo. And if you recall, we did launch an already planned make-over of our site last Sunday.
[edited by: Yippee at 1:00 am (utc) on Nov. 4, 2005]