Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Jagger - Part 2

         

Brett_Tabke

1:08 am on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Continued from
[webmasterworld.com...]

greenfrog

8:23 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The DC that you end up at is most likely dependent on you local DNS cache, and not routing by google's servers.

dethfire

8:24 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I agree, 66.102.7.99 has really nice results

StriderUK

8:25 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>>>Everyone needs to stop with the wild-haired "seeing of Jagger 3" and wait until Jagger 3 is actually presented. <<<

I agree, and I find it surprising that some people are not being more sympathetic to those of us who are still out in the cold. Saying J3 is here (against all the advice) doesn't help, it just adds to the worry.

macdave

8:25 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



This Mozillabot crawl is interesting -- surprised it's not getting more attention here. It's been hitting 2-3 pages per second on our site for the past several hours, including some of our old 301'd Supplementals that haven't been touched by Google in ages (but just those with external backlinks, it appears). And it looks to be an *extremely* thorough crawl of exisiting pages currently linked within the site.

Is this intense spidering an attempt to clean up the Supplemental index? MC indicated that Jagger 3 will address canonicalization and supplemental index issues. Those are the kinds of things that would require such a large-scale crawl to fix effectively. It wouldn't surprise me to see Jagger 3 debut a shiney new index, with new/improved data affecting SERPs more than any specific algo tweaks.

<added>Yesterday "normal" Googlebot activity on our site dropped to around 10% of usual, and has stayed there during this Mozillabot crawl. Is Jagger 3 the debut of Mozillabot as the primary Google spider after a year +/- of testing?</added>

[edited by: macdave at 8:37 pm (utc) on Nov. 3, 2005]

fredde

8:26 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)



66.102.7.99 is pre-jagger.

gosman

8:35 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



<<66.102.7.99 is pre-jagger. >>

66.102.7.99 is definitly not pre Jagger

SEOTard

8:38 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



yes it is.
no it isn't

snore.

Mountdoom

8:42 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



It's behind yooooouuuuu!

driwashsolutions

8:46 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



66.102.7.99 is pre-jagger.

Nope, nada, no way.

Yippee

8:47 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Morpheus: I imagine that right now you're feeling a bit like Alice. Tumbling down the rabbit hole?

Neo: You could say that.

Morpheus: I can see it in your eyes. You have the look of a man who accepts what he sees because he's expecting to wake up. Ironically, this is not far from the truth. Do you believe in fate, Neo?

Neo: No.

Morpheus: Why not?

Neo: 'Cause I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life.

Morpheus: I know exactly what you mean. Let me tell you why you're here. You're here because you know something. What you know, you can't explain. But you feel it. You felt it your entire life. That there's something wrong with the world. You don't know what it is, but it's there. Like a splinter in your mind -- driving you mad. It is this feeling that has brought you to me. Do you know what I'm talking about?

Neo: The Matrix?

Morpheus: Do you want to know what it is?

(Neo nods his head.)

Morpheus: The Matrix is everywhere, it is all around us. Even now, in this very room. You can see it when you look out your window, or when you turn on your television. You can feel it when you go to work, or when go to church or when you pay your taxes. It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.

Neo: What truth?

Morpheus: That you are a slave, Neo. Like everyone else, you were born into bondage, born inside a prison that you cannot smell, taste, or touch. A prison for your mind. (long pause, sighs) Unfortunately, no one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself. This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back.
(In his left hand, Morpheus shows a blue pill.)

Morpheus: You take the blue pill and the story ends. You wake in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. (a red pill is shown in his other hand) You take the red pill and you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes. (Long pause; Neo begins to reach for the red pill) Remember -- all I am offering is the truth, nothing more.

(Neo takes the red pill and swallows it with a glass of water)

I think NEO was an idiot... He could have been taking X for cryin out loud!

[edited by: Yippee at 8:57 pm (utc) on Nov. 3, 2005]

followgreg

8:57 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Googleguy,

Just to follow up, I'd like to say that the misbehaving website was removed, that was pretty fast great work!
However the "SEO company" (the real responsible) keeps on spreading their spam and cheats, I think that this one is the one to target because they convince their customers, not very knowledgeable, that it is ok to hide text, build cloaking pages etc...
I just submitted some more spam from them, on more competitive terms.

I suppose that it's going to take some time considering the HUGE amount of cheats only from that company across all industries and all continents, it feels a little like they are playing Google isn't it? With their URL embedded in their cloaking pages :)

Good investigation!

Dayo_UK

8:59 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)



>>>It's been hitting 2-3 pages per second on our site for the past several hours

I think my site could handle that - but 20 a second for a sustain period.

Yippee

9:00 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Are you running the site on an e-Machine? You should upgrade you know :) Also, you probably shouldn't be posting here right now considering the resource consumption and all.

[edited by: Yippee at 9:05 pm (utc) on Nov. 3, 2005]

Dayo_UK

9:04 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)



Lol - not hosted at home.

20 hit per second for a sustain period works out at 72,000 page requests an hour.

When my site was doing well I only recieved say 500 visitors an hour.

walkman

9:08 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)



>>> I think NEO was an idiot... He could have been taking X for cryin out loud!

some would say that people cut and pasting TOTALLY unrelated comments on a Google update thread are...well you get the point :)

Yippee

9:09 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Well, good luck in keeping up your system. This is a critical time for you to get crawled even though the number of hits is not reasonable. Hope it goes well.

Eazygoin

9:11 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Matt has posted on his blog if anyones interested....reveals quite a lot!

Yippee

9:11 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



No, I don't get the point walkman... Why don't you tell me, and the rest of everyone here that has diverged what you meant by that statement...

I have yet to call you or anyone else names, let's maintain the peace please ;)

[edited by: Yippee at 9:13 pm (utc) on Nov. 3, 2005]

thecaptainandcookie

9:12 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)



From Matt Cutts, Today, November 3, 2005 @ 1:39 pm
"Let’s see. Multiple data centers are now showing Jagger2, but I don’t think every data center is. I believe Jagger2 is at the cluster of data centers that includes 66.102.9.104. Stephen, I don’t think we support crawl-delay in robots.txt. But you might check out sitemaps–it might allow you more control.

Paul, the objective of Jagger is to improve our index results. The three stages are actually three independent launches.

urdudesamy, there are some Jagger1-related changes going on at 66.102.7.104."

[mattcutts.com ]

[edited by: thecaptainandcookie at 9:15 pm (utc) on Nov. 3, 2005]

Dayo_UK

9:13 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)



Anyway, database is now reloaded and I have changed a primary key around (as it probably was not best optimized anyway)

Even with this change it is unlikely to be able to survive that type of crawling (IMO)

Re MC Blog post - intresting so 66.102.7.104. is becoming Jagger1 - (what was it before?)

>> Stephen, I don’t think we support crawl-delay in robots.txt.

I know - lol ;)

FlowerUK

9:18 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hi All!

Please help!

I was reading through all your comments during the last weeks, but did not find the answer for my problem.

I have a "new" site that got Pagerank during Jagger1 except my homepage that has a pagrank of 0. All other pages and subpages have a PR form 4-6.

I was hoping that during Jagger2 it will change, but nothing has happened.

Any ideas about or solution for that?

Thanks for any comments indeed.

steveb

9:33 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



66.102.7.99 and the others in that group are a very pleasant improvement. I see some sites returning on the English Googles (but semi-strangely not in other languages) and overall better rankings with a lot less spam. Nice development considering it is pre-Jagger3. For a site of mine returning, mostly, there there are some isolated oddities like the second and third best pages for a keyword being the ones to rank rather than the most appropriate one. Hopefully things like that will sort out in a few days.

Dayo_UK

9:35 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)



steveb

The sites that I have had problems with especially look encouraging on allinanchors - eg some Homepages ranking :)

WebPixie

9:37 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Matt mentioned that some DCs are seeing Jagger1 related changes.

Got me thinking, what if these are three separate updates that will yield 3 unique resulting SERPS and the flux after Jagger3 is stable will be the merging of the 3 sets of results?

So jagger2 would not in fact be built on top of jagger1 but in isolation as would jagger3.

Just a passing thought, I was assuming that jagger2 was an extention of jagger1.

steveb

9:40 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Yes, and the pages acting oddly on a site mostly back are doing poorly in allinanchor, so that does seem to offer some hints.

Rick42

9:41 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>>>> No, I don't get the point walkman... Why don't you tell me, and the rest of everyone here that has diverged what you meant by that statement...

I have yet to call you or anyone else names, let's maintain the peace please ;) <<<<

I honestly found that nonrelevant post quite amusing ;P...It kinda felt good reading something that excluded an IP adress within it's content....but for the purposes of this thread...I would have to say I understand Walkman's viewpoint.

...there should of been a google related punch at the end at least!

followgreg

9:42 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



FlowerUK, this is quite common I think for new websites that built incoming links right before an update.
Your pagerank will be consistent throughout your site starting form the next PR update IMO. So you will have to wait 3-4 months.

No big deal, already seen that in the past, can't explain it though, but so far it would never prevent you from having great rankings in the future.

stevexyz

9:42 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



FlowerUK

How long ago did ou launch the site - or was indexed by G?

It looks like with Jagger that its only including sites older than 3 months.

reseller

9:43 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Jagger3 (nickname Canonicals killer)..The Father of All Updates!

Hi Folks!

Those of you who do art painting know this feeling for sure: you don't wish to show anybody your work until you have finished. Reasons mightbe that people tend to judge your work too early without even knowing how the final painting will look like.

Thats exactly how GoogleGuy and Matt Cutts feel at present. They just don't wish us to see the stegs of "creating" Jagger3, but wish us to wait and see the final Jagger3 in action.

It was/is therefore our good kind friends GoogleGuy and Matt keep telling us that Jagger3 will not be visible before Friday or during the weekend. Fair enough, I do understand and appreciate keeping in mind that we as webmasters are known for being very impatient people.

Having said that, nothing chage the fact that we have noticed today the start of Jagger3 or the first sub-stages of Jagger3 on one or more of the DCs I mentioned in previous posts;

216.239.53.99
216.239.57.99
66.102.7.99

To make things very clear and very simple, I'm just asking our good friends GoogleGuy or/and Matt Cutts to post few words to the effect that we are wrong and the serps of the said DCs aren't related to Jagger3 at all.

And for that I say a BIG THANK YOU in advance to GG & Matt.

[edited by: reseller at 9:49 pm (utc) on Nov. 3, 2005]

Atomic

9:46 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Why would they ever need to be built on top of each other?

If J3 is basically a re-indexing couldn't Google then pick the best aspects of J1 & J2 and throw them into that new index and push it out the door?

This 1222 message thread spans 41 pages: 1222