Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Saga. Part 6

         

selomelo

6:25 pm on Nov 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member





Continued from:
[webmasterworld.com...]


The same down-and-on problem here in Turkey.
But j3 goes on and off. No steady results. At least three different sets:

216.239.63.104 (I think with additional tweaks)
64.233.161.104 (still J2)
64.233.179.104 (J3)

StriderUK

3:35 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Dayo_UK, interesting comments and I hope you are right. Our homepage doesn't appear no.1 for searches on site:www.mydomain.com either (we have a pr of 6).

But is this just wishful thinking (i.e. that pr power runs through the site from the homepage and this influences the serps). Is this how google works? (I don't have a clue!)

tigger

3:39 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



snap PR6 and site:www.mydomain.com pulls me up second

Dayo_UK

3:45 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)



>>>>(i.e. that pr power runs through the site from the homepage and this influences the serps).

Well most of it surely - if your homepage/root has problems then the rest of the site will suffer.

LegalAlien

3:54 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Dayo_UK

>>> Ooops - sorry - I do tend to do that sometimes when I think a bit more. <<<

LOL

>>> There also seems to be a stage between 2&3 where the homepage ranks for other searches within your site. <<<

I haven't seen a good, deep crawl since this fiasco started; just lots of frequent crawls of a hundred or so pages. So even though everything's current and indexed correctly for us, I do think there's a huge pot-luck aspect affecting serps for many sites, depending on what data repository Google's looking at.

We spent a lot of time adding new, and updating older content, so Gbot has been pretty active. I suspect these frequent changes/visits have helped to push out old data, and have expedited this entire www resolve process for us. I also suspect these changes are directly responsible for the volatility we are now seeing in our serps.

What I really look forward to is a directory PR update. I know many here will regard that as irrelevant, but this will put an end to all this speculation about whether or not inbound links have been devalued/are being ignored. With the link issue crossed off the list, all other factors determining ranking can be directly analyzed/monitored, so are not subject to speculation.

I have the feeling that last comment will put me in front of a firing squad here, but I'm leaving it in anyway ;)

Dayo_UK

4:02 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)



LegalAlien

The link argument was only put forward by people who really dont understand what has been happening. (IMO of course).

Obviously BL benefit gets tweaked frequently no doubt and the odd site might get a penalty for bad linking practices - but it does not explain why so many sites cant be found for their homepage, and drop hundreds and hundreds of places for lots of phrases.

>>>I haven't seen a good, deep crawl since this fiasco started

No me neither (except by Mozilla Googlebot and that does not count)

Pico_Train

4:05 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



My toolbar PR has changed from 6 to 5.

I know I know, toolbar pr blah blah blah.

LegalAlien

4:05 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Dayo_UK,

Sorry, I meant for the link comments to be a separate issue. I wasn't implying this had anything to do with what we were discussing.

LegalAlien

4:06 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Pico_Train,

Thanks for your valuable comments. That's not what I was saying!

Dayo_UK

4:08 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)



LegalAlien

I know - I was agreeing that it should be crossed off the list (except for perhaps one site in a hundred).

Pico_Train

It is just a rollback of PR - G dont seem to want to give up on the old Toolbar PR just yet.

Pico_Train

4:09 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



OK, you posted too quickly, I had no idea you'd said anything.

No worries!

LegalAlien

4:17 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Pico_Train,

I've been attacked a lot in here, so I'm now really fast on the defensive -- sorry ;))

reseller

4:22 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Hi Folks

Special thanks to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth ll and Google.co.uk for being so kind and generous today. Around 25% of my google referrals today are from google UK.

Have any of you UK folks seen changes on google UK that I should know :-)

tigger

4:28 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



just checked on UK only for one of my main keywords still showing amazon/ebay/directories/virgin airways in the top 10 for a term thats nothing to do with flying so no changes from my end

Dayo_UK

4:29 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)



>>>Special thanks to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II

Lol - dont thank her.

Google.co.uk just looks like the same as normal - UK people must just like your site Reseller. :)

ramachandra

4:36 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Today for some of my site internal pages got PR2 and PR3 but still no luck for my site home page.

Anyone there noticed any change in PR for there Homepage?

reseller

4:37 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



tigger

That doesn't sound good at all. How about you and Dayo_UK moving your sites to danish domains ;-)

texasville

4:39 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>>>It is just a rollback of PR - G dont seem to want to give up on the old Toolbar PR just yet.<<<

That is exactly what happened to my site. All pr rolled back to exactly before the last update. The directory pr shows even more rank than what I currently had. This extended in to the added benefit of I am back in the sandbox just like I was before the update. Very exasperating.

reseller

4:40 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Dayo_UK

>>UK people must just like your site Reseller. :) <<

It seems so. And therefore a song to all my UK referrals:

Rule, Britannia! Britannia, rule the waves; Britons never shall be slaves :-)

texasville

4:44 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I think Dayo called it right. It is a "fiasco" and if I didn't know better I would say that google has turned off everything akin to jagger and started over. I have pages going url only daily.
The only changes I have made is to strip remaining optimization from my pages such as alt tags. I am trying to make it soooo white hat it glows.

tigger

4:47 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>Rule, Britannia! Britannia, rule the waves; Britons never shall be slaves

LOL thankyou reseller as usual you always put a smile on my face :)

LegalAlien

4:52 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



now let's see if tigger can recite the Danish national anthem LOL ;)

finer9

4:54 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Is it normal that I am seeing different page rank on my site's main page, depending when I hit it?

Obviously I am hitting different data-centers, but it has gone back and forth a bunch of times, just today on separate visits.

tigger

4:57 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>now let's see if tigger can recite the Danish national anthem LOL

ummmmm pass :) but I like the bacon :)

LegalAlien

5:02 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I don't see any PR difference on any DCs.

tigger -- flouncy, bouncy, trouncy, pouncy, fun, fun, fun, fun, fun... who who whoo :))) How'd you manage to get such a cool handle, anyway? Every time you post I have to grin and cast an eye on the furry orange and black figure on my desk ;)

tigger

5:06 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



its a long story I had to offer Brett my first born.

Say I've got one of those on my desk but does yours bounce :)

Sorry - back on topic

LegalAlien

5:25 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



tigger,

The proof is in the sticky ;)

I'll have to take it down soon though -- don't want to loose my job over our furry friend ;)

LegalAlien

5:58 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I saw a 30 percent increase in traffic from Google organic results yesterday. I don't see any difference in our serps across the DCs for the terms I monitor, so this seems really weird. This is around 70 percent of our pre-Jagger traffic from organic listings, even though we're off the first page for all but one of our main terms.

It seems searchers are now going to 2nd and 3rd pages. It also seems that more traffic is coming in via deep pages that are now ranking. We weren't seeing this before - or maybe these were so few that I wasn't paying attention to them. Is anyone else seeing different traffic patterns?

taps

6:07 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Two of my other sites (I don't check them too often) went down by 20% since Nov, 24th.

Checking some keyword phrases I found Ebay first where on of my sites was before. My site offers an article about buying widgets. Entering "buy widget" (singular) brings up Ebay and another selling site first. "buy widgets" (plural) shows my site first. My article's headline is "Buying Widgets: How to blahblah".

I remember that, three weeks ago, my site used to show up first for "buy widget" too. I really did like those results. Apparently Google did not.

Conclusion for this day:
Going to start up a new site about danish bacon with eggs (layed in one basket)

LegalAlien

6:18 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



taps,

I noticed a few days ago that 64.233.179.104 was treating singular/plural terms differently. On other DCs, where a site stipulated plural, it would still rank for both, whereas this DC was dropping the singular-term serps.

This still appeared to be okay on other DCs 2 days ago, but from what you say, this behavior has spread. I'll check this for our area in a while, but if this is correct, that's not good news ;(

Dayo_UK

6:40 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)



texasville

To be fair - I think Google are getting closer to resolving a problem.

If my theory that Google is having problems determing the root page (due to canonicals/hijack) is even close to correct then the most important bit of my post was that some homepages were getting crawled that had not been crawled for ages.

A couple of other threads have picked that up too.

However, there is still evidence that although these pages are being crawled that they are still not being treated as the root and this might be holding G back a bit.

There seems to have been a crawl on about the 17th-20th (which picked up some uncrawled homepages) - which for me put a lot (not all) of the sites I monitor in the postion where site:www.domain.com returned the homepage first on most DCs (except the orignal J3s + and a few others)

These number 1 positions for the homepage on site:www.domain.com fell out after a few days.

There seems to have been another crawl on about the 27th-30th (which again picked up the until recently uncrawled homepages) - this did not however put the homepages top in a site:www.domain.com search.

For a couple of sites I have watched two crawls of the homepage that quickly are virtually unheard of in recent times (eg the cache date for the page when it appeared with title and description was probably February time.)

However, the most frustrating thing at the moment is the lack of noise coming out from Google..... are they working on something or is this just me reading the signs wrong :(

This 1107 message thread spans 37 pages: 1107