Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

October 2002 Google Update

Official

         

liamgt

10:03 am on Oct 31, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Definately getting different results on backward links for yahoo. www showing 657k and www2 and www3 showing 654k. Results for CNN are also different. Looks like the real deal.

Liam

[edited by: liamgt at 10:06 am (utc) on Oct. 31, 2002]

msebian

10:30 am on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hy Guy´s,
from Cologne(Germany) i see not update this time:(

jetboy_70

10:31 am on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



As it's been asked a couple of times in the last few pages, and to expand on Laz's post:

Google seems to have two distinct spidering activies:

The first is the regular spidering of sites each month which contributes to the dance/update at the end of the month.

The second is the repeated spidering of sites throughout the month that Google perceives as important for 'everflux' updates - intermediate regular mini-updates of page content information only, no additional backlink or PR calculations, sometimes displayed with a date or 'fresh' tag on the SERPs.

When the dance starts, www2 and www3 use the regular spidering information, and discard anything gathered in the meantime for everflux. This is why some sites are seeing 'old' pages on www2 and www3. After the update moves onto the main index, the everflux spidering will start again, and pages will hopefully be updated to the latest versions.

If anyone can expand on this (are there distinct spider names, is the same spider used, is Google likely to figure everflux info future dances etc?) then your input would be appreciated.

lazerzubb

10:56 am on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

studmuffin

11:21 am on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Thanks for that, Lazerzubb. I guess where I'm confused is this....

Does Google actually crawl during the update process or is it a case of sifting through and indexing what it's already got? I haven't seen any activity from googlebot on my server during the past few days.

Bottom line, I guess just like to see a little page rank as a reward for endless e-mails to people grovelling for links. But when?

I know, be patient. . .right?

nervous_seo

11:24 am on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Thank you GOOGLE!

Your update is way better than last months and my listings are pretty much back to the way they were!

WE CAN EAT AGAIN:)

Still seeing some spammy competitors but I am sure you will boot them soon!

Keep up the good work and NO-MORE last month scares PLEASE :)

fathom

11:29 am on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Does this mean your users name "nervous_seo" is no longer valid! :)

Congradulations nervous_seo!

Duke_of_Url

12:22 pm on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member




Update looking aok here too, checked my referring search engine uniques today, and yahoo.com has leapfrogged ggl.com, so I checked and the updated ggl index *looks* like its in y! already - or am I seeing things? will the update showing (for me) in y! stick or will the ggl everflux have a knock-on jitter to the yahoo results for a while? Once everything settles down I expect ggl.com to return to its position at the top of my SE referrals list.

cheers
DoU

shady

12:26 pm on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Just seen my PR increase, even though the new backlinks are not yet showing in www!

<edited>.... AND I've just seen it go back down again! Maybe a glitch :(
</edited>

politicsandlabor

12:53 pm on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



politicsandlabor, it usually takes a few days for the switchover. Always a good excuse to take a long weekend.

Ah, now, GG, you see, there is this event coming up, first Tuesday in November, don't ya know... I know you've heard of it (insert smiley face here);)

All that matters is what happens between now and then. After that, some of us "foot soldiers" will go out for a few pints of "black and tan" and then get back to our regular lives.

Ironically, I expect a (small) boost in our ratings NEXT month.. . (which won't do us any good by then)

Rookie question: I've started a site map at the root level of our site directory, just to make it easier for your bots to find all of our pages. Am I on the right track? Or a waste of time? We post a lot of new text content, usually, every day, and my hope is for it to get indexed ASAP because it's often "breaking" developments.

pshea

1:31 pm on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



politicsandlabor:>>Rookie question: I've started a site map<<

this is a good thing to do.

rfgdxm1

1:35 pm on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>I agree with you in that point, but then I really don't know why I got a penalty on Google for the site mentioned above.

I'm thinking that if you would go to the effort of signing a ton of guestbooks, you probably also were doing some shady things with the code on you site. If Google actually is penalizing just for a site appearing in a lot of guestbooks, SEOs would be using that trick to sabotage their competition. Shouldn't be expensive to hire some bored kid to sign a lot of guestbooks with the competitions URL.

nervous_seo

1:54 pm on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Fathom

LOL - sorry still nervous but more relaxed now - :)

Marcos

2:18 pm on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hi jen24815,

>And, for that matter, I seriously think you overestimate
>our influence...

WW is a excellent point of contact between Google and the guys who really care about Search Engines and pay adwords, that is, us.
Google is a very smart company, and is taking advantage of it. Other old style, more shelf righteous companies, will just ignore us, loosing touch with reality. I do think the exchanges here, no matter how "colourful", are positive to both sides.

djgreg

2:22 pm on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



rfgdxm1:
I haven't done any tricky things with the code. I have no intention to get on a good postion with that site. It doesn't matter where it stands, so no tricky code.
I really cannot imagine why I got this penalty.

rfgdxm1

2:32 pm on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



In that case djgreg why did you sign a lot of guestbooks if you had no concern about its search engine positioning? If you didn't do anything tricky with the code, then hopefully somebody at Google isn't penalizing sites because of links from guestbooks. Googleguy said this isn't policy, but its possible somebody at the Googleplex who handles abuse wasn't aware of this. Is there any chance that you may have linked into a bad neighborhood without realizing this? This can easily happen if you promiscuously share links with other sites.

Marcos

2:35 pm on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hi GoogleGuy, as always, is a pleasure chatting with you,

>Sorry I missed you earlier Marcos. The next time we do
>business cards I'll ask if I can have "soulless propaganda
>instrument" in addition to my normal title.

Nah, we will like more to see the GoogleGuy Title printed on it. I think people in this forum would actually pay to see that. :)

djgreg

2:37 pm on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I'll tell you why I signed the Guestbooks: Of Course to get a higher PR. Maybe I have linked to a bad neighborhood, but all links are dropped from the site since 3 months.
At that time I didn't know that there are things like "bad neighborhoods" on the web.

Do you mean, that if a PR7 site links to a penalized PR0 site, the PR7 site will also get PR0 the next time?

allybongo

3:09 pm on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



cool, the results for my no. 1 keyword have now moved from www2 & 3 to www now! Is that significant?

northweb

3:25 pm on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Check my sites this morning and they all got buried. I maintained my pr5 on my sites but lost on my main two keywords from 2nd page to 8 - 10th page.

Other keyword phrases where most of my traffic found me also disappeared. Can anyone point me to the right person to chat with....see one year of development being flushed.
northweb.

heretic

3:30 pm on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Funny thing...I was checking a couple of new sites, suddenly they had a PR6 and PR5 respectively, just a few weeks out of the gate...and right in front of my eyes, the googlebar turned off the ranking and said it isn't ranked at all. I found it funny and wonder how likely to see it come and go from one second to the next? Must have caught it during a switchover :)?

Go60Guy

3:32 pm on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



allybongo - Its been my understanding that until the update fully propagates to all the Google servers, you'll see www fluctuating back and forth. I last heard that there are some 13 servers, so it takes a while for the update to finalize with all the servers. Patience is the watchword during an update.

allybongo

3:40 pm on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



aaah, that is sort of what I thought Go60Guy, but since the update started www2&3 were the same and www was different. Now its changed and I have more backward links.

Hope it doesnt change too much, I'm no. 1 for the first time!

djgreg

3:45 pm on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hm, i can't see any changes however Google has not counted haöf the backlinks to my sites :(

Go60Guy

3:50 pm on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Re backlinks: You won't necessarily ever see all the backlinks to your pages. I know of at least 1,500 links to one of my sites, but only about 1/3 are ever counted by Google. Don't expect links from anything below PR4 sites to show up.

europeforvisitors

3:56 pm on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)



allybongo wrote:

Hope it doesnt change too much, I'm no. 1 for the first time!

I've been following the monthly Google updates for nearly a year, and if there's one thing I've learned, it's not to count on anything--good or bad--until the update has settled down. Still, it's always good to be hopeful. At the moment, I've got some new #1 positions in this month's update that I'd like to keep. :-)

djgreg

3:57 pm on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I know that links under PR4 sometimes do not show up, but I also have a couple of links PR5 and higher and NO (zero!) links are showing up for that page.

ikbenhet1

3:59 pm on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



My pr7 backlink isn't showing!, but the pr7 site does show all his backlinks.?
This is the weidest thing ever on G. Been waiting for the update to start. And now waiting for the update to update.

Hope it's a little bug,
but can't imaging why www2 goes to www sometimes when while we 'claim' our backlinks aren't showing, meaning not all sites are backlinked.

---> can somebody confirm this: THE SItes that were everfluxing last month are not added yet in the database of G.?

ps. kinda funny, that fast has everything picked up. This update round my Vote goes to fast.
Another 1 of these weird updates and in my opinion Fast is better than G, now Fast has fresher and newer pages than google and they have more sites indexed.

Great.:(

Helpmebe1

4:56 pm on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



ikbenhet1
nothing on back links yet? I know I dont... someone just pointed out all the junk that went on at dmoz could cause that link to not show.. but what about yahoo and all the rest of the links?

ikbenhet1

5:08 pm on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



helpme.., no nothing shows. we better give up hoping for this month , before we really get dissapointed after G settles and nothing changes.


What really worries me, is that last months everfluxing sites are not added, at least not my everfluxing sites.

What do they expect from me, te adjust the pages everyday this month so i can have another everfluxing month? I don't think so. Nope. Won't do. I've gone far enough.

edit> yeah helpmebe1 you're right, i'd better not say that.

[edited by: ikbenhet1 at 5:17 pm (utc) on Nov. 1, 2002]

Helpmebe1

5:11 pm on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



shhh.. the google people listen when you say not to send them.. :)

And seriously..not giving up.. if they dropped every single link to my site.. well then all hell will be breaking loose... ok..maybe dmoz is ruled out for this month because of their little mishap..but noway should all the rest... including yahoo! Theirs noway they dropped every single link to me... nope..nope..nope..not accepting that answer... Im not hearing that... nope... not gonna happen... :)

by the way.. I still have PR even without a single link showing but it is really fluctuating all over .. keeps dropping then raising like a yo yo

This 555 message thread spans 19 pages: 555