Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
As most know, if you typed FAILURE in G you got the bio of GWB. On the J2 DC's this seems to be corrected.
Just a thought that J2 might center around back-link quality, relevance etc... <<
Agree 100%... Again, if you are weak on links, you shouldn't be spending too much time in here looking at DCs and praying. Instead, you should be out there shaking down sites for links.
[edited by: Yippee at 8:55 pm (utc) on Nov. 4, 2005]
You can see why now. They are doing all sorts of mix and matching. Obviously you couldn't do that if you just dumped one completed thing on top of another completed thing.
Logic order - Homepage followed by Cached pages - supplementals at the bottom ;)
This ordering I am talking about - is really only consistent on 66.102.9.104 & 66.102.11.104 at the moment (so not all Jagger2s)
I'm liking these IPs. Not as much as my red wine though...
Why else would G do 2 updates (let alone 3) back-to-back that are supposed to be mutually exclusive.
In essence, why rearrange your furniture one way to create more light in the room, then the next day rearrange the furniture to allow better airflow and have both rearrangements be completely separate of each other. It would only make sense if you planned on having two separate rooms.
From Matt's blog:
"Paul, the objective of Jagger is to improve our index results. The three stages are actually three independent launches."
- Just trying to think outside the box...
66.102.11.104
I noticed the same changes earlier on 66.102.9.99. Our non-www homepage has finally disappeared on that DC and the others you mentioned, but [site:mysite.com] is still returning the same random order as other DCs. (While a few other sites I looked at do have their homepages first on the DCs mentioned and not on others.) Not sure what the practical ramifications are, but it's nice to see that Google can maybe sort out what pages are most important within a single site.
He's not the Jagger of Search, he's more like the Greenspan of Search :)
Which is the root of the Canonical url problem :)
Where? Which Dcs?
Which is the root of the Canonical url problem :)
===
Can it? Google can do that? If Google can do that, I would suggest that Google did. Do that, I mean...
Google isn't doing that. Google isn't doing that at all.
Maybe Google will do that, one day...
But not yet - I see that Google isn't doing it yet...
But not yet - I see that Google isn't doing it yet
Jagger 1- The index (or datacenters) had to be updated to allow for the large amount of new data.
Jagger 2- The new data is added in. (Thus the full listings are back.) These pages have no power at this point so they won't show in results.
Jagger 3- The algorythm (or a new one) is then reapplied to the index without the power of the links from supplemental pages, and with the power of the 'released from canonical issues' pages.
>>i am the SEO of the year!<<
And you are hereby declared the SEO of the year 2005 :-)
Ok. Now you tell us where do you see those results?
Ok. Now you tell us where do you see those results?
ok..was checking 127.0.0.1
the results were so incredible it was like searching my own computer!
the results were so incredible it was like searching my own computer!"
hehe
thanks i need to laugh sometimes.
>>Ok. Now you tell us where do you see those results?
ok..was checking 127.0.0.1 <<
LOL..
And I hereby withdraw my declaration that you are the SEO of year 2005 :-)
are u there? are u checking 66.102.11.99? can this be the real J3?
>>66.102.11.99 terrible listings, and I'm no where to be seen on this DC. I hope this is not what you guys are suggesting of things to come... <<
You just need to close your eyes and imagine that the following DCs donīt exist :-)
66.102.9.99
66.102.9.104
66.102.11.99
66.102.11.104
Now you feel better, right? :-)
Look. J3 hasn't even started; and when it does it is going to continue until at least about November 12th to 15th, I would think...
