Update Jagger - Part 2 - Google Search and SEO forum at WebmasterWorld

Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Jagger - Part 2

Brett_Tabke

1:08 am on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

Continued from
[webmasterworld.com...]

Hollywood

3:04 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

Once again... say with me "I am going to optimize"

Optimize my hand movements, no not that way....

B-E-E-R - T-I-M-E - A-G-A-I-N

Go Polska - (Okocim) Pivko

- Hollyweird

PS [add] Cheers theBear!
PS [add] Cheers Yipeeeeee!

[edited by: Hollywood at 3:14 am (utc) on Nov. 5, 2005]

theBear

3:08 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

2by4,

You have sticky.

Yippee,

LOL

Hollywood,

I have my HSA in hand, cheers.

Yippee

3:14 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

Samuel Adams: I'd rather put people in stale beer than stale beer in people. OR was it beer in stale people?

Cheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeers all :)

2by4

3:49 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

man, this is starting to feel like peer pressure, but if it's what one has to do, one has to do it, cheers...

Atomic

3:59 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

I feel like champagne but the Grolsch is already cold. Not bad eather way.

yvt360

3:59 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

no, its feeling like beer pressure, oh boy, better grab another.

Yippee

4:05 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

Thread is moving slow... Anyone care for real time chat on the haps over a few drinks? It's secure and anonymous. Sticky me.

2by4

4:12 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

mmmm... grolsh, real grolsh, not the stuff they sell in the states. Good beer, very good.

giga

4:16 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

"66.102.11.99 is bad bad news"

Yeah that is the post Halloween Results Datacenter. Frightening!

RunnerD

4:23 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

Thread is slow because every webmaster is getting wasted after the few weeks we just had. I know I am.

Rick42

4:34 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

66.102.11.99.......now that is just S-C-A-R-Y....halloween is on Nov 4th for me this year....

....Sr#w the beer.....straight for the vodka is where I am headed.

Yippee

4:35 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

Share the love Runner... Stop by for chat. Sticky me.

Webmeister

4:39 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

Looks like Jagger Part #3 has arrived. I did a little better this time. I hope it sticks.

Hollywood

5:07 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

RunnerD

Just finished my third, European type, 3x's the strength of this California junk.

Still going...

dmoz24

5:36 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

Brett isnt it time to make another topic for this discussion. (Just suggestion)

AlexK

5:54 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

My stats show a small-but-significant rise in visitors every day in November. Normal week is bell-shaped, this one is straight up.

The actual numbers involved are very small, but yet again it indicates the impact of changes in Google SERPs and, for the first time in 12 months, it is good at my end.

spaceylacie

6:02 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

A new discussion will kick in when 66.102.11.99(or whichever DC is currently carrying these results) is officially named Jagger 3. These are the results I've been following all along. But, they have switched from DC to DC.

Stay in the dark, people, turn off your lights, go to bed.

frup

6:08 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

66.102.11.99 results are completely new, they were not showing up in any of the datacenters previously. All of the nonsense posted in the past few days was just that. 66.102.11.99 are really truly new and radically different SERPs. Now, I have no idea if these are Jagger3 results or something else, but they are really new and really different from anything we've ever seen on Google.

followgreg

6:08 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

If this is Jagger3 I dunno why some websites from Israel or whatever country 3000 miles from my borders are poping up on top of my SERP especially while they don't even seem to have backlinks from English speaking webpages and don't give a damn indication in the anchor text, that's mystery to me....another glich? ^-^

spaceylacie

6:12 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

66.102.11.99 results are not new. I've been watching the same results for at least 24-48 hours, just very slight changes.

Dayo_UK

6:14 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

Would have thought GG would have jumped in over night (well my night) and jumped in if anything significant was happening on 66.102.11.104 & 66.102.9.104 (or .99 as people keep calling it.)

These sites are still showing the ordering I noticed last night (Steveb - you said for a while they did not?)

The Jagger1 dcs look a bit different to me this morning (I guess that is just flux though)

spaceylacie

6:16 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

Since yesterday morning, with just a little flux going on.

followgreg

6:20 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

I think that the fact that Yahoo wants to get part of the "public relation" type of update, let's call the beast by its name we are in a PR situation, would make Google keeping the pressure as long as possible to totally delete the Yahoo attempt?

What do you guys think?

tigger

6:26 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

hey! whats going on with G! my site has been dropped for all its main keywords most were ranking in the top 3 for very competitive terms on both .com & co.uk now we are down at 60th or even worse, anyone else seen as massive drop? According to my stats G traffic stopped about 1 hour ago. and googles cache show 2/11 on the index - anyone got any clues as I'm one very worried webmaster

Dayo_UK

6:29 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

What we need is a weather report on

66.102.11.104/66.102.11.99
66.102.9.104/66.102.9.99

These were definetly Jagger2 a day or so ago - but are now different from the rest of Jagger2.

Maybe just an extension rather than Jagger3.

PatrickTaylor

All the checks that were done for Canonical urls in the past might not mean anything going forward - eg with the changes this update brings you may still be able to have non-www listings (incl homepage) and not have a problem - therefore what I am looking for at the moment is that G understands that the homepage is the most important page in the site - therefore the above DC groups show encouraging signs IMO etc. It just all depends on how Google tackle the issue

ramachandra

6:37 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

Seeing different results on this datacentre 66.102.11.99 today. When I search for my domain name, previously it use to show only url, no title, no description. Today on the above said datacentre not showing URL too. Is it a good sign or bad. Whether my site will come back in SERPS?

Thanx!

tigger

6:39 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

just checked

66.102.11.104/66.102.11.99
66.102.9.104/66.102.9.99

my site has vanished from them all! you got any views Dayo?

Dayo_UK

6:42 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

Tigger

Vanished - totally gone - or deep?

I would not bet on them being Jagger3, but as I said last night - if you do site:domain.com searches then results seem to be in a logical order within a site search. (So from that point of view it is encouraging) - however my sites that have improved in this aspect still dont rank.

So still a work in progress?

ramachandra

If pages are still listed within a site search and you still get the line:If the URL is valid, try visiting that web page by clicking on the following link: www.domain.com on a domain search then it is not necessarilly a bad thing - it is a sign your homepage is not getting crawled to well though. IMO.

[edited by: Dayo_UK at 6:44 am (utc) on Nov. 5, 2005]

fredde

6:42 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

googd morning!

these are not old results now, very strange.

Dayo_UK

6:45 am on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

fredde

They are the same as I was seeing last night - but it appears they retreated during the night at one stage - as per Steveb

This 1222 message thread spans 41 pages: 1222