Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Cassandra! Google Montly Update

Part ONE

         

qball0213

3:23 am on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Check it out, I'm seeing 661,000 links for yahoo.

DotBum

5:03 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



thanks to evock & dwilson - I will have to go and check up on my competitors ;)

GoogleGuy

5:14 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



cindysunc, I don't know when exactly the button got pushed, but I'm sure the WebmasterWorld folks noticed pretty quickly. Hope you did well in the contest to call the start of the index!

currington

5:21 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



My PR is up and down more times than a pair of hore's knickers at the moment. My previous PR was 1 so I hope it does continue to go up.

GoogleGuy

5:56 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



currington, I am so not going there. :) Probably you just need to wait for the update to settle down over the next few days. And if the site is new, expect it to take a little while to build links over time.

daroz

5:59 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



GG,

A more general question for ya...

You mentioned in a few places that you were interested to see the results from sites with hidden links.

How soon do you want to start seeing reports on sites like that? (And other 'spam' etc, sites that have since been reincluded but not cleaned up?)

Lemon

6:00 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



About 3 weeks ago, I went through and changed every page on my site. Only about 75% of my changes went through. Can anyone help explain? Will this change, or once the update starts, is what I get what I am stuck with...

korkus2000

6:03 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Hey Lemon welcome to the board,

You are seeing pretty much what got included. There may be a small chance it will change, but I doubt it. PR may fluctuate, but what has been indexed won't.

baby_gifts

6:05 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Forgive me for what I suspect may be a simple question - What does the "-ex" mean in the www-ex.google.com?

I have searched the glossary but it isn't listed. I had never seen it before and it gives very different google results.

Respectfully & Thanks

internetdude

6:12 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Based on the past few months of updates, it seems that Google has changed the schedule to a mid-month update. With the deep crawl following the update, it seems like Google has either done something to their schedule or something is seriously messed up.

Opinions please :)

ciml

6:23 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Welcome to WebmasterWorld, baby gifts. www-ex.google.com is just one of Google's data centres [webmasterworld.com]. It was to the first one to get this month's index, which is why it's different for a few days.

internetdude, to the best of my knowledge Google never published an update schedule. We sometimes think it's early or late, but only because our predictions were wrong. It's just ready when it's ready.

Huntersbiz

6:31 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I continue to be optimistic that Google will respond to spam reports. I was hopeful the new update would weed out a page I reported that shows up #1 for my keyword yet resolves to a 404 error page!
I realize that in the end it will have to be the algo and not human hands but jeez, why have the spam report address if it is ignored?
Googleguy?

mrguy

6:47 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Agreed on the spam report.

I know Google wants to let the algo filter out all the spam, but there are some things that can not be filtered.

Until then, we'll just have to live it.

Yidaki

7:01 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Fortunately it's quite too early to loose *all* nerves. But unfortunately in general www2 and www3 indizes are very similar to the final index ... so when i look at the "coming index", i'm starting to in fact loose a lot of my nerves.

Formerly removed or penalized spammers seem to be the winners again. They are back without any changes made to their sites. I don't want to go into details ... don't want to start another spam discussion. But i'm curious if i'm the only one who makes this observation!?

- hidden links, alt text stuffing, linked 1x1 images can boost a site again up to #1
- dodgy cloaking and redirects for dummies no longer gets penalized
- crosslinking of tons of domains works great again
- guestbook only backlinks can still make a site #3

BTW: Allthough it's been discussed a lot and disclaimed many times, i feel that buying adwords *could* result in a reinclusion for removed or penalized sites. One guy whose 200+ sites have been penalized, purchased a lot of adwords for about two months (two update cycles). Now, he's back in the coming index with exactly the same garbage he purchased the adwords for - plus his sites that are crosslinked from there. That's at least strange and opens doors for such thoughts, no!?

Or is it just because of a missing line in the new algo code?

mipapage

7:33 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I'll bite, Yidaki,

and offer some agreement in accordance to what we discussed here in this thread [webmasterworld.com].

I have found that as Everflux happens, some spammers rejoin, only to disappear shortly therafter. I have no idea if everyone sees this, but it surely isn't only me!

Given that this update has fresh tags in it, maybe part of the problem is the one mentioned above and in the other thread.

kiwi webmaster

7:34 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Interesting update this one!

BigDave

7:41 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Looks like the normal minor shuffling to me on a bunch of my SERPs. Up on a few, down on some others.

I dropped backlinks big time, from 532 to 194. Hopefully it will add them back in later in the dance.

At least I can see that my Google Directory entry is now in there. I had been expecting it to kick up my backlink count by giving me more internal pages with higher PR.

Oh well, it's the SERPs that count and all the new content and deep links should keep my site traffic growing.

Yidaki

7:43 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



yah minipage, i saw your answer there ...

15 minutes ago i started a new thread about this since i'd say, that's a important question. Unfortunalety my post is either lost due to a db error or i has been deleted by a mod. In the second case i would expect a short sticky mail but it could be that the mods are so hardly dealing with the current load that they first organize, merge and delete the threads here at WebmasterWorld and then send their explanations out to the members.

<added>Oohps, my thread was merged with this one ... yaaawn ...</added>

[edited by: Yidaki at 8:14 pm (utc) on April 11, 2003]

vmaster

7:47 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



How many out here are experiencing a drop in PR, but still maintaining / improving existing rankings?

netguy

7:57 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



vmaster... one of my older PR6s dropped to PR5 :( , but still holding the #1 spot for its primary keyword. Two newer sites (only 3 months old) went from PR3 to PR5, but also holding up well in the SERPs. Noting less PR in some sub-pages as well.

stevegpan2

7:58 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Please shed some lights on this:

the update this time is from index deepcrawl in early March. And a new deepcrawl is coming soon to pick up changes from middle March.

Thanks much. I am still not clear on this.

mipapage

7:59 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Yidaki,

I have a feeling that it is a freshbot issue, and that they are trying to sort it out. My (very very unknowledgeable) guess is that they got the freshies out there doing faster crawling which results in noticeable changes to the SERPS. At some point I think something got tweaked in one place and maybe not another, cause, at least in my cases, the spam only returns once every odd freshdate.

Vmaster:
My pages either stayed the same or moved up a notch. Whohooo!

stevegpan2:
I think you've got that right.

skipfactor

8:02 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Steve, it will pick up any changes until it gets there; get to work! :)

Craig_F

8:10 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



> - hidden links, alt text stuffing, linked 1x1 images can boost a site again up to #1

Yes, unfortunately I'm seeing this too. I'm soooo sick of it.

stevegpan2

8:12 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I am wondering why use hiddent text and links. Why not just make them visible?

Thanks....

rfgdxm1

8:14 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>How many out here are experiencing a drop in PR, but still maintaining / improving existing rankings?

My main site's home page has been bouncing between PR6 and PR5. As it was PR6 last update I have a bad feeling about this. :( Inbound links haven't dropped. It looks to me like PR may have dropped across the board this update. Thus, your PR may be down, but so are your competitors.

mipapage

8:17 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Stevegpan2,
It's called spamming. Stuff your site full of your keywords wherever you can and viola, you rush up the Serps. People hide them because the repetative use of words is useless content and looks silly.

I'll stickmail you with an example.

skipfactor

8:22 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



It looks to me like PR may have dropped across the board this update.

That means Google drops to PR9 right?--couldn't resist. :)

Yidaki

8:27 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>That means Google drops to PR9 right?--couldn't resist. :)

... at least in my eyes! -- couldn't resist. ;)

rfgdxm1

8:30 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



dmoz.org looks like it is still a puny PR9 to me.

mrguy

8:32 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Yes, if this update sticks as it looks, I'll have to go back and stuff keywords into all my nice looking pages so they resemble the junk that just shot to #1!

Why Google, oh Why!

This 581 message thread spans 20 pages: 581