Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

I'm seeing live Brandy results now

Is this across the board?

         

Liane

4:04 pm on Feb 19, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I am finally seeing the Brandy index in the regular SERPS. Is this the real deal or is it still cycling?

Ledfish

2:13 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



GG Said "It could be newer data percolating in. No index snapshot is going to stay completely static"

Granted, but that would have to be an awful lot of new data to move a site from #6 to #74 as it stand this morning.

Something is not working right GG. We are once again seeing inconsistancy in the Brandy Update and based on past experience, it says, Google hasn't got the overall problem fixed properly. As the inconsistancy becomes more apparent it is going to lead right back to the negative reactions that webmasters have had for months. Also when you have several websites in the top 15 getting a second non-indent listing in the top 30, eventually the average searcher is going to continue to see these as poor results.

Given that webmasters and joe surfer alike are dissatisfied with Google as of late, something that has been evident in the last month, its time that Google either steps up or it will find itself contiued to be cast out. Of course you know Google is aware that it's momentum is dropping and fast.

quotations

2:27 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



A long time ago (in web years) GoogleGuy said something along the lines that we should expect that traffic would go down and conversions would go up over time as the algo got better.

That may have been around the time of Dominic.

Since that time it has been going exactly that way on the site which makes most of the money.

Suddenly in the last 36 hours

Google percentage is down from 45% to 12%
Yahoo percentage is up from 30% to above 50%

Traffic is down 30%
Conversions are down 90%

Is Brandy still just an interim step towards the previously stated goal (better targeted traffic for better conversion rates) or has that goal been eliminated?

Ledfish

2:54 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



"Is Brandy still just an interim step towards the previously stated goal (better targeted traffic for better conversion rates) or has that goal been eliminated?"

missed altogether, in other words, a total failure!

borisbaloney

2:57 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



we should expect that traffic would go down and conversions would go up over time as the algo got better.

That is a pretty standard goal of search engines. They want to send users to the best sites for them as they can. That goal has not been changed, and certainly not eliminated.

I would suggest that (especially with semantics) they are pushing towards trying to find the truly relevant gems, out of the hundreds of thousands of sites that Google sees as at least partially relevant, not just the SEOd ones.

Not an easy task, but one that would result in lower traffic (for SEOd sites) but a higher conversion overall.

Miraracar

3:12 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



A long time ago (in web years) GoogleGuy said something along the lines that we should expect that traffic would go down and conversions would go up over time as the algo got better.

I don't know about that, but in the past few week at least it seems more people are finding my site with more relevant terms. But since brandy Google traffic has increased 20-30 percent and conversions haven't? It seems I am seeing more of the opposite of that statement. I am happy about the traffic but still, should would say "reserved" about how relevant google results are.

On the other hand Yahoo is way up and relevancy seems a little bit better, however I don't want to make a judgement to soon.

j_do

3:13 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



missed altogether, in other words, a total failure!

Agree with you totally here. And these are certainly not the results we've been 'promised' last week. The 64.* servers provided clean results then, now they're full of offtopic (sub)sites and spam. (At least for results in Dutch that is).

GoogleGuy

4:44 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



There's still some spam changes waiting to be approved, and I know there's at least one in Dutch pending. Ledfish--I mentioned a way to get specific feedback to us (email webmaster [at] google.com with brandyupdate in the body). That's the best way to mention a search that you don't feel is up to snuff.

needinfo

4:52 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



GG

Can we now basically say that update Brandy is over?

jocelynd

4:57 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



There is still some things going on for sure.
Today most of my rankings changed quite a bit compared to yesterday.
Most have been pushed to basically what they were before yesturday.
The yo-yo phase maybe...lol

AthlonInside

4:58 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



GoogleGuy,

1. What kind of SPAM are google currently working on?

2. Are penalties to SPAM permanant?

PhoneGuy

5:03 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I still can't believe the Brandy update is over. I am seeing basic page counts for site:example.com on 64 much larger than on the www as follows. (In my area G resolves to one of the 3 IP's shown.

64.233.161.99 - 20,100 pages
www (216.239.37.99) - 13,400 pages
www (216.239.39.99) - 15,400 pages
www (216.239.57.99) - 19,800 pages

Wouldn't this show that each IP is accessing different data or am I missing something?

zafile

5:13 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)



"There's still some spam changes waiting to be approved..." It will be great to see Google's technology in action!

I've been keeping track of Google's monthly updates since November 2003.

It's been a nuisance to see a site that uses doorways keep its number one position for 2 months while my sites went MIA.

Finally, this week one of my sites made the Top 20. The doorways site remains in number one.

Since Yahoo replaced Google this week, the same doorways site is number one in the new Yahoo index. My Google Top 20 site is also a Top 20 in Yahoo's new index.

It will be great to see Google beat Yahoo in terms of anti-spam techniques.

So, go ahead and approve the spam changes!

markus007

5:42 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Is Brandy still just an interim step towards the previously stated goal (better targeted traffic for better conversion rates) or has that goal been eliminated?

The quality of the google index is not measured by much $ is added to your bottom line every day.
If someone is only looking for info about widget and finds you through the google SERPS, then your conversion rate would go down, but the relevance of the serps are up. Googles definition of targetted traffic may not meet your definition.

yowza

5:45 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



How about this.

For the search "my city web design"

13 of the top 20 are directories
3 don't have the words "web design" anywhere on the page
1 doesn't have the city name on the page, only in meta keywords
3 are relevant
Top 5 are directories

This is the worst update from where I'm sitting.

Horrible!

I guess it is time to start my own directory.

Ledfish

5:51 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



GG, I did provide a report.

seofreak

6:04 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



yes, yowza .. that's the case I have noticed for web design searches mainly ..

wouldn't hurt to have a new domain for a reciprocal directory structure and put whatever content I want, to rank well ..

EffectiveInternet

6:09 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Unfortunate results...

64 looked fabulous. but if this is the end results it looks more like 216 did a week ago..which resembles florida in my search topics.

Not spammy...but not very targeted serps either...bah

phidentity

6:10 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



GG,

Any news on the report I sent you to do with the really spammed up (and very blatant I may add!) results I found?

Cheers mate,

Jon

canuck

6:41 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



<sarcasm>I'm devasted... my favorite NHL team has been removed from "city web design"... how will I ever find what I'm looking for? ;)

Brandy is not giving the user what they're looking for - I want my favorite sports team in every search, doesn't G know?
</sarcasm>

Liane

6:47 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Google Guy,

I am still seeing at least two and possibly three sets of different results rotating in and out of the live Google. I know they are different sets because I have been tracking them very closely and have all three sets (of the searches I do) carefully documented.

Is it the plan to have different data sets cycle through randomly or will it actually settle down with just one set of results?

jocelynd

6:52 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Last week when people were looking at 64...
Most feedback here sounded like everyone in general were flabbergasted about it...
More this update is progressing, more it's changing and feedback seems to not really be as positive as before...

MedCenter

7:00 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Cabbie:


>>Top 3 for over 70 competitive single KW's btw.
#1 for 700 for 2 word phrases.
Thats funny Medcenter.I can only find one serp you are in and thats at no#5.
Cheers

what are you looking for? must not be what we are optimizing for...

tell you what, go find out which drug sold the most in the US last year [prescription], and then google "buy [keyword]"

Marval

7:07 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



jocelynd - I would attribute that to the fact that what "was" on the 64 datacenters a week ago is a far cry from what went over live - and very dissapointing that some specific references that were made early on in the original update thread as postives have been changed back to the Austin results

MedCenter

7:08 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



which server are you guys looking at?

64.233.161.104

for me that one has been steady...

jocelynd

7:15 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I'm looking at google.com (ping gives 64.233.161.99)
Which is one of those that were pointed as the future update results.

MedCenter

7:16 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



thanks jocelyn... interesting though, my serps are the exact same on all 64.* and www*

maybe its just my sector though. i do remember seeing some changes yesterday [but they were good changes?]

cheers :)

PhoneGuy

7:24 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>I'm looking at google.com (ping gives 64.233.161.99)<

Very interesting. Here in So. Cal. my pings are different...

google.com - 216.239.39.99
www.google.com - 66.102.7.99

jocelynd

7:27 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Here google.com is basically always 64... if I ping.
I did not compare the different centers.
Only what I see as a standard user using google.com
Like I said... maybe it's the yo-yo phase...

jocelynd

7:33 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Yes PhoneGuy it's different from a place to an other.
We are sent to a center that is close or free to server your search.
If the data on both is the same then you won't see a change in the results.
The yo-yo or flux must come from the data being fresher or older on the center you are sent to.

helenp

7:34 pm on Feb 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



From spain

.com is: 216.239.39.99

and. co.uk and .es is: 216.239.39.104

This 229 message thread spans 8 pages: 229