Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Dominic - Part 8

Speculation Continues

         

lasko

9:43 pm on May 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Google now shows on their main index the new update and new algo.

I thought Google where going to add more back links but they no.

The number of backlinks on one of my sites have dropped by 50%

I hope this posting is acceptable

mrbrad

8:57 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Other "Google Partner" sites that are "Enhanced" or "powered" by Google are now showing FI results, such as Compuserve.

I'll bet that these big customers of Google have a service level agreement in place where Google promises to have new data delivered every month. Since Google is behind on their usual update schedule they are sending these sites to FI and SJ to keep up with the terms outlined in the SLA.?

just a guess :)

[edited by: mrbrad at 9:01 pm (utc) on May 13, 2003]

crobb305

8:59 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I can tell you now that when my Grandma goes to Google or Yahoo and searches for "sewing machines" she doesnt say ... "ah these SERPS are crap! Google blows!"

It would be very arrogant of Google to assume that the average Joe isn't going to notice crappy results, and that only webmasters will. Google needs to stop this nonsense and get back to doing what they used to do so well.

Anon27

9:02 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I'll bet that these big customers of Google have a service level agreement in place where Google promises to have new data delivered every month. Since Google is behind on their usual update schedule they sending these sites to FI and SJ to keep up with the terms outlined in the SLA.?

If I were Google, I would pay a late fee penalty before I released FI to a customer.

Chicago

9:03 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Can I direct all my calls from clients wondering where their beautiful, highly ranked pages went on AOL, to Google customer support? They don't care why. They just know they are gone.

IRRATIONAL AND UNPROFESSIONAL is the only thing I can say. STOP paying so much attention to aquisitions and ad serving G if you cannot deal with Search, and start paying more attention to your SERPS and the people's interest who helped make G what it is. Because this is flat out wrong.

Vrian_Sinth

9:04 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Perhaps Google's most recent algo changes and dance results are pulling irrelevant sites and they decided to go back to a simpler, more relevant database. I don't know...just a thought.

Anon27

9:06 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Well stated Chicago.

GG, you back from lunch yet?

mrbrad

9:10 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Something tells me Google is going to see a big spike in AdWords business over the next 30 to 60 days.

Which will only encourage more of this behavior in the future...

power_iq

9:13 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



mrbrad, i think so, too. This would be logical.

ircgeeks

9:13 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Anon27,

From the looks of these SERP’s I would say that All of Google is out to lunch.

Google is trying to promote Ad-word sales with crap serp results.

Vrian_Sinth

9:13 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



It would be very arrogant of Google to assume that the average Joe isn't going to notice crappy results, and that only webmasters will.

I really don't think the average Joe will know the difference. In fact, I'm pretty sure they won't.

ircgeeks

9:15 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



hey Chicago,

do you have that number?

GG what is your Extension number?

*whistle*

[edited by: ircgeeks at 9:16 pm (utc) on May 13, 2003]

crobb305

9:16 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I really don't think the average Joe will know the difference. In fact, I'm pretty sure they won't.

Funny...at work today, a coworker doing a travel search found two porn sites in the top 10 serps. Thought it was funny. Obviously, they noticed the poor searh results.

jranes

9:17 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Well for now we are only talking about the powered by sites. The sky has not falled yet.

Critter

9:18 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



@ crobb:

I hardly think that "big b**bs travel" can qualify for a travel search...

:)

j/k of course

Peter

Dayo_UK

9:19 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)



Critter & Crobb

I can see the link with Ibiza though (Perhaps they got themed together)

crobb305

9:19 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Critter...

I hardly think that "big b**bs travel" can qualify for a travel search...

LOL I guess you are right...maybe the serps were relevant afterall. ;)

Tropical Island

9:21 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I already referred to the AdWords aspect about a 1000 posts ago.

It seems reasonable that a website owner would want some consistency in their results. Trying the free route is not reliable. We are fortuante to have AdWords in all our important terms so whatever happens we will survive.

Some of our terms in the free listings have fallen while others have remained steady. What really bothers me is that we arranged for some quality backlinks that have not yet been factored in.

mrbrad

9:22 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Google is trying to promote Ad-word sales with crap serp results.

Ok, I think we are starting to figure out this new ALGO.

Heres how it works:

Tweak the ALGO just enough to piss off the webmaster into buying AdWords but not so much that Joe Blow surfer gets too upset.

Most Joe Blow surfers think AdWords are just another SERP.

Very clever on Google's part.

[edited by: mrbrad at 9:25 pm (utc) on May 13, 2003]

Dayo_UK

9:24 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)



What Makes everyone sure that we cant omptimize for this new algo - when and if it settles?

Goalposts need to be moved otherwise it will get to predictable...

Chicago

9:27 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Dayo, with all due respect, G's algo is looking for the most relevant results thru on-site and off-site factors. They are not looking to confuse people by creating a moving target.

That is why we are so disappointed right now.

ircgeeks

9:28 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Tropical Island,

I congratulate you on being lucrative enough to pay for Add words. Thanks to you Google will Survive and be able to continue offering crap SERP’s.

The sad part is allot of website’s that are information based and not E-commerce pages can’t afford to shell out .20 a click.

I think praising add words is the exact opposite of what will help this industry. With your theory the internet will be nothing more than one big infomercial.

Vrian_Sinth

9:29 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



What Makes everyone sure that we cant omptimize for this new algo - when and if it settles?
Goalposts need to be moved otherwise it will get to predictable...

Good point!

mrbrad

9:31 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



With your theory the internet will be nothing more than one big infomercial.

My point exactly!

This is perfect timing for Google's upcoming IPO.

Its all about the money my friend.

parabola

9:32 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Geesh! When GoogleGuy said they would gradually update the backlinks to the recent data I was hoping he meant soon. Now that the partner sites are showing the fi index it seems the worst has been confirmed and something is seriously wrong here as I doubt it would take them this long to update.

Dayo_UK

9:34 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)



Chicago

Dont get me wrong - I am disappointed in this update, I re-designed my main site two months ago and virtually all the pages have disappeared from SJ and FI following a good April update.

Perhaps I have to much faith in the goodness of Google - it is however suprising if Google know that there is a lot of missing data (and from what GG has said they do know that there is missing data) that they are happy for these serps to go mainstream.

But I am sure we will learn by hanging out at Webmasterworld and testing our own sites with what works and what does not work in Google and other Search Engines.

However I am a one man show - and for the SEO out here with clients asking the questions I can understand the stress levels!

rfgdxm1

9:35 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>I really don't think the average Joe will know the difference. In fact, I'm pretty sure they won't.

But this sort of average Joe likely would just as soon use msn.com because that is what IE defaults to in searching. Google needs to offer better to get people to go to google.com.

Morgan

9:40 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Chicago:
IRRATIONAL AND UNPROFESSIONAL is the only thing I can say.

I agree, it's irrational to tell your customers that their sites will appear somewhere you have no control over ;). But seriously, I don't think any of our sites in any category probably have a monopoly on being relevant or decent.

Do we honestly expect them to just schedule things so we can be sure we get our edits based on the new algorithm in before each major crawl? The more I read this thread the happier I am I got penalized on one of my sites, I had to wake up and realize there were ways to sell outside of Google.

Chicago

9:42 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>>Dont get me wrong - I am disappointed in this update, I re-designed my main site two months ago and virtually all the pages have disappeared from SJ and FI following a good April update.

Dayo, understood and agreed. Same thing over here.

I just hesitate to believe that this is G keeping us on our heels. This more resembles a major problem with -sj and -fi. As I had said before, I was just fine waiting util we had a fully updated index. I was prepared to be as patient as necessary.

Then Wham! The GG self-prescibed incomplete index went live on AOL and Yahoo. Thus crossing all lines of integrity. And 2000 posts later, we have yet to get an answer other than there is "nothing more to add".

What a mess!

jranes

9:47 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Chicago, the new index is not on Yahoo yet.

wackmaster

9:48 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)



I just looked at -fi...at Yahoo! Definitely.
This 303 message thread spans 11 pages: 303