Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Google PR Update

         

Coop99

12:06 am on Jul 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Noticed changes in PR for sites of mine right now! Finally!

Dorian

6:49 pm on Jul 20, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



SiteRank, what a great idea. You should patent that.

Eathan

7:06 pm on Jul 20, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Just a quick post so I can leave the email notification box un-checked this time around...

I had a question back on page 30 or so and got a pile of reply notifications. Unfortunately the bulk of the posts have been pointless posturing...

If anyone has any thoughts on reasons a site's homepage might drop from PR4 to PR0, I'd be very curious to hear 'em. Internal pages have kept theirs, so something has been judged amiss by Google. I don't do any link swaps on that site, nor do I use any PR padding techniques, so nothing jumps to mind.

HarryM

7:30 pm on Jul 20, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Eathan,

A couple of things you could check are:

Does Google show a duplicate homepage? For example http/domain.com/indexpage.html as well as http/www.domain.com/indexpage.html. Sometimes Google has both indexed with different PRs.

Do your internal pages link back correctly to your home page?

Eathan

8:11 pm on Jul 20, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



HarryM,

Thanks! Good tips.

Google has 508 pages listed from the site, with only one version of the index page, "http://www.domain.com/". External links look to be pointing correctly (full domain with the slash).

I did just notice that the internal "home" links are all relative (href="/"), rather than absolute (yet another area where the developers ignored specific instructions). I'll certainly fix that before the next update, but with external links being absolute, I'm not sure that alone would do it. Anyone else see anything that might point specifically to issues with PR and relative URLs in this last update?

Event_King

11:22 pm on Jul 20, 2005 (gmt 0)



I see the problem with Google - not site owners. Google set all of this up from day one, the datacentres, the toolbar, it's ranking structure - everything. But many don't truly understand what's going on hence the panic. A panic which Google is 100% responsible for.

How can 'webmasters' be at fault? There's just too many factors involved in this PR thing - is it content, is it seo, is it links etc, er, they probably all count to a degree, but Google has control over what page holds what rank, and there really is little you can do about it. My site did have a PR4, but after a redesign and domain name change, it has to start at the bottom again.

People on here aren't giving the full story behind their PR problems, and others are guessing at what it might be, thus errors in judgement are going to happen.

Plus, the web is about Google, and Google are seen as to want to own the web. So millions ARE going to believe what Google does as Gospel, and will follow the most powerful, successful product. That's how basic this is.

People, Humans like to belong to something, be part of a group - just look at webmasterworld for the power that a following can have...... So what does Google do - it creates a method of sucking people in!

The Toolbar.

Give someone a rank, membership status or really anything - and you feed a want, flatter someone, you know, whatever you want to call it. But flattery is what this is all about, and is where the problems begin. Another problem is the inflated egos in forums, everyone thinks they're an expert at this game, and the truth is they just aren't - unless of course they all hold degrees in marketing or advertising.

After listening to various theories on here, anyone would think that over 50% of members either work or have worked for Google. It's stupid to speculate about such guarded information about the toolbar, Google itself or it's latest strategy. We don't know - nobody knows about the toolbar errors ok, and that's that. Let's not cloud or feed inaccurate information to people - it's just not helping anyone.

I'm sure Google are working on the problem and will fix whatever needs to be fixed. After all, if the toolbar is that powerful, they aren't going to want to let it slide. Too much money involved.

Know what I'm saying!

[edited by: ciml at 4:01 pm (utc) on July 21, 2005]
[edit reason] Tidying up the thread. [/edit]

texasville

12:36 am on Jul 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I just had to bring thus up for the "blind faith" people that think google is infallible.
I just saw a sight that got attacked last fall by a hacker and wasn't put back up. It has nothing but an under construction sign. When you check it in google it shows a lot of supplemental pages so google must be able to see it's root directory. The internal pages content is pretty much wiped out. Just ads still on there. Point is front page under construction just got a pr7.

BillyS

3:05 am on Jul 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Look at a member like Clint; a good example of drama queen behavior over some Google Page rank.

While I wouldn't call Clint a drama queen, it does seem to me that he posts quite a bit. Could be frustration...

If he has half as much energy for his website as he does on this forum, he'll be fine over the long haul.

johnyfav

7:33 am on Jul 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I too have notice clint posts alot however I would say drama queen was a bit harsh.

He is passionate and enthusiastic however unfortunate to have suffered with the recent updates.

More people like him in the industry and less 'black hat' SEO's and we would all be smiling.

oddsod

8:19 am on Jul 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I just had to bring thus up for the "blind faith" people that think google is infallible.

Strangely, that's not something I've seen a lot of in this thread. There are a lot of things wrong with Google from the 302 hijackings, to covering up their own 302 Adsense page debacle by stating it was a "bug", to the canonical problems - for goodness sake.. there seem to be millions of sites affected by no redirection setup between www and non-www ... it doesn't take the resources of LSI to work this out!, to the carefully guarded corporate speak we sometimes get that doesn't really say anything.

Posters pointing out that PR losers may actually be seeing normal, typical, correct toolbar behaviour are not necessary Google apologists because they haven't clearly stated that they don't subscribe to the "Google is God" theory.

steveb

9:00 am on Jul 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Since there are no "blind faith" in Google people on Earth perhaps we can not waste electrons on such stuff.

And there is nothing weird about and under construction page having a PR7. PR is just links. It pays no attention to content, and never has.

Pico_Train

10:09 am on Jul 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Links create PR! Yes! Well put SteveB.

HarryM

12:38 pm on Jul 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Eathan,

internal "home" links are all relative (href="/")

That shouldn't be a problem. Mine are the same, mainly because I can test my system on a PC-based Apache server without any modifications.

Munster

2:08 pm on Jul 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The PR boost I saw on Monday seems to have gone, has anyone else seen this?

Clint

2:11 pm on Jul 21, 2005 (gmt 0)



I had a question back on page 30 or so and got a pile of reply notifications. Unfortunately the bulk of the posts have been pointless posturing...

Oh, you noticed that too, eh? ;)

If anyone has any thoughts on reasons a site's homepage might drop from PR4 to PR0, I'd be very curious to hear 'em. Internal pages have kept theirs, so something has been judged amiss by Google. I don't do any link swaps on that site, nor do I use any PR padding techniques, so nothing jumps to mind.

Well if you listen to a couple of people on this thread, it's all YOUR FAULT since "Google is perfect and infallible". I too am trying to find out the same thing since I KNOW G is FAR FROM perfect and certainly VERY fallible.

johnyfav

2:12 pm on Jul 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The PR boost I saw on Monday seems to have gone, has anyone else seen this?

It's been up and down more times than Jordans knickers in the last couple of days!

Clint

2:14 pm on Jul 21, 2005 (gmt 0)



While I wouldn't call Clint a drama queen, it does seem to me that he posts quite a bit. Could be frustration...

You got it! ;) MUCH MUCH frustration.

If he has half as much energy for his website as he does on this forum, he'll be fine over the long haul.

Hee hee. :) I do, so I guess I'll "be fine" over the long haul". ;)

Clint

2:21 pm on Jul 21, 2005 (gmt 0)



Links create PR! Yes! Well put SteveB.

Yes, but what we are saying is that we are seeing high PR on pages with NO LINKS whatsoever; no incoming, no outgoing. I can't speak for that "under construction page" someone mentioned, but if it too is a brand new website and has no IBL's or OBL's, that's certainly indicative of something not right.

Clint

2:32 pm on Jul 21, 2005 (gmt 0)



"We're sorry but you do not have permission to access [alexa.com...] Your IP address, 66.249.65.102, has been blocked due to a possible violation of our Terms of Service."

Did Alexa block Google?

On my end, a G search for Alexa shows it first, and its cache works (cache comes from [72.14.207.104...] ). Alexa.com here shows a PR of 7, www version shows a 0 (zero). Hmm, interesting, amazon shows a PR of 0! I guess because their home page redirects to some "odd" page.

Eathan

4:54 pm on Jul 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



HarryM, relative URLs may not be a problem and I can't see them being the problem, but I do make it a personal policy to use absolute URLs when pointing the homepage of a site so there's no confusion on the part of... well... Google, between .com, .com/, .com/index.htm, etc.

Well if you listen to a couple of people on this thread, it's all YOUR FAULT

It might very well be my fault. Until I figure out why it happened, it's a bit early to say. If it is, I fix it. If not, I fix it. Makes no real difference in the end.

It's annoying sure, but not half as annoying as seeing the decimal slide two places to the right on earnings per click on Adsense, or having my best converting Adwords disabled because they only ever generate clicks on content match, or finding a 302 bastich as the only listing for "mydomain.com keyword"...

Clint

5:18 pm on Jul 21, 2005 (gmt 0)



It might very well be my fault. Until I figure out why it happened, it's a bit early to say. If it is, I fix it. If not, I fix it. Makes no real difference in the end.

Did you recently do anything to your website linking structure wise? If you find it's not your fault, and you fix it, please let us know HOW you fix it. ;) Or for that matter, regardless of the fault let us know how you fix it.

bekyed

8:22 am on Jul 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Whos Jordan?

Im Katie Price Now and dont forget! ;)

Bek.

petehall

9:03 am on Jul 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



PR has rolled back, and I think some results are rolling back. Just lost a brand new site after being very impressed at initial pick-up speed.

MSN now has this site however it's gone in G.

Google really is confusing me at this moment in time.

stuartc1

9:14 am on Jul 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



google are just messing with us, lol.
I've seen it roll back and forward at least 3 times here in thr UK. Looks like there are testing the PR update speeds and possible new factors (new parts to the pr algo).
If there are google employees in the know reading this thread, they must be having a great laugh. It's all fun and games at google!

pmc2001

9:51 am on Jul 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Google is dancing and it is dancing to the beat of my tambourine. For all those affecting by the sandbox, I see many are resurfacing and resurfacing strong for huge keywords.

Ryo Azuki
"Patience is a Virtue that I have no time for"

Clint

12:32 pm on Jul 22, 2005 (gmt 0)



PR has rolled back, and I think some results are rolling back. Just lost a brand new site after being very impressed at initial pick-up speed.

Odd, hasn't rolled back for any of my sites. In fact, that brand new one page site I've been mentioning with not a single IBL nor OGL now shows a PR of 4 and an "INCREASE of 30% in the new update" with the future PR tool! My sites where I lost 2 PR spots still show that loss.

Phil_AM

1:09 pm on Jul 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



What the heck is going on? I just went from #3 on our main keyword to 14! In the past 4 years, I've fluctuated between 2 and 5 and have never been on second page...

Any ideas? Is this permanent?

ltedesco

1:21 pm on Jul 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Probably another big update coming!

Clint

1:31 pm on Jul 22, 2005 (gmt 0)



Hell, apparently Bourbon isn't even over yet since I'm still seeing DAILY changes in the G SERP's for many of my monitored phrases. Overlapping updates? (I think that's one of the signs of the Apocalypse).

Phil, that's happening to me on Yahoo now! (1st on 1st page to #10 spot, 1st on 1st page to 45th spot! etc.).

Phil_AM

1:47 pm on Jul 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Good lord, I'm going to have some explaining to do!

To the senior members, should I sit tight and see what happens into next week, so should I start "fixing" (ie. messing with stuff to see if there is any result) things?

petehall

1:58 pm on Jul 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Sit tight.

I may not be a senior member, however I've been in the business six years now.

I only found this website last year and don't use it as much as some of the other members.

Personally I'd never use post count as a stamp of quality / credibility.

This 493 message thread spans 17 pages: 493