Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Part 4 Update Jagger

         

GoogleGuy

9:18 am on Nov 7, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Continued from:
[webmasterworld.com...]


reseller, Jagger3 ended up having less emphasis on canonicals. I plan to make that a theme in my feedback to people at work though.

AlexK, that's a different domain. But the point is very well taken. You've found a pretty obscure query (~295 results) that the keyword stuffing spammers like to target. I'll check this out in more detail.

[edited by: Brett_Tabke at 1:03 am (utc) on Nov. 12, 2005]

TammyJo

5:21 pm on Nov 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



***Deleting dup entry sorry*** Site seems to be doggin'...maybe it is me!

[edited by: TammyJo at 5:29 pm (utc) on Nov. 9, 2005]

TammyJo

5:21 pm on Nov 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Thank you! Happy Birthday to you too Kperr!

Yes, I know what to wish for when I blow out my candles...how about you? :)

StriderUK

5:29 pm on Nov 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



That makes three of us with birthdays today :-)

BTW some of the search results are way out at the moment - I have a feeling google will pull J3 again pretty soon.

g1smd

5:49 pm on Nov 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



>> On that datacentre (66.102.9.104) it has full versions of a page that I banned with Robots.txt a long time ago. <<

There is a lot of that out there.

>> Before this update, google had URL only (no cache or descriptions) listings of these pages, but that datacentre has descriptions and cached versions of the pages that I wanted to remove.

Google dumped a whole load of ancient data back into their index without doing any sort of reality check on it. They did this in May, maybe in July, again in August, and again in recent weeks.

>> How do you remove pages completely from Google? <<

You can't. If the page is a supplemental result, they seem to want to keep the data forever. Google remove may get rid of it for 90 days, and then it gets relisted, even if the page or the whole domain no longer actually exists.

kperr

5:53 pm on Nov 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Site wonky here, too.

theBear

6:07 pm on Nov 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



My system says it is slowing down in qwests network.

theBear

6:10 pm on Nov 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



My system says it is slowing down in qwests network.

9 ewr-core-01.inet.qwest.net (205.171.17.125) 68.877 ms 67.818 ms 64.445 ms

just about here >>>>>>>

10 * * *


11 dal-edge-12.inet.qwest.net (205.171.25.142) 75.476 ms 76.173 ms 78.039

Dayo_UK

6:40 pm on Nov 9, 2005 (gmt 0)



g1smd

PR0 on all those versions :(

Some Internal pages have PR and some internal pages get crawled.

With ref to the Canonical Home Page problem.

If domain.com = PR0 and www.domain.com = PR5 - if Google pick the domain.com as the Canonical maybe this has resulted in the PR0.

I dont know :( - almost given up on the site in question.

Eazygoin

6:56 pm on Nov 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Has anyone noticed .7.104 data being fed to .9.104?
This 729 message thread spans 25 pages: 729