Forum Moderators: open
The results look really good.. hopefully this will reflect across all the datacenters soon. Seems like the spammier sites I compete against have moved down while the good honest pages have moved up.
[googlestore.com...]
Also, allinanchor is more important for pithy searches... one word, common two words. allinanchor isn't important for "name of the fifth Beatle" or other obscure and multiword queries. Those sorts of links just don't hardly exist.
Again, the point is that if a site ranks well for allinanchor, the vast majority of the time it ranks well for the search result, so any idea about some generic penalty for good anchor text is just nonsense. The search results we are seeing now clearly contradict that notion.
In order to for me to say "this is the reason" site or siteb has gone up or down, I need to compare with 10 or so other sites that have done the same, with same sorts of site set up.
eg. two identical words in title, links to bad neighbours etc.
I am not seeing this. Each hypthoses I ahve tried, is not matched by similar results from other sites I manage.
sit tight
If I use one of the various google dance machines and look at a keyword we are still there at a decent listing.
If I go directly to the server ie www3.google.com and search we are not there.
Yep I have cleard my cache and checked it on two machines.
Any ideas?
Any idea what sort of filters?
If I use the ie? for my main keyword it is the same as a regular search. If I use it for a less popular term I am number 10 with it as opposed to 90 without.
Any ideas when this madness ends and the crying/celebrating starts?
Google's profiling is about as accorate as the police profiling. A lot of trash remains in the SERP's, and a lot of good sites have gone AWOL.
Whitehat/blackhat? Get serious.
There are specific issues that affect search quality - instead of shooting from the hip Google might want to address those specific issues.
Cheers
Any idea what sort of filters?No, and I don't think it has to be any given set of filters. My experience has been that the two sets of results converge as the dance ends. My experience is not remotely close to statistically significant though.
coosblues,
I have learned from people in this thread and others like it. I would like to think I have helped people in this thread and others like it. Yes, there is a lot of noise, but in thirty years we'll think the new music is a lot of noise and long for the gentle melodies of Slipknot.
It's all relative.:)
funny you should say that - this has happened to me. 3 sites have dissapeared, 3 new ones are doing very well and one single page site is #1 for a very competitive term.
i didn't mention it because i can't imagine it still being there in a few days.
i'd be quite happy if things remain as they are but all those people with 1000's of link exchanges must be pulling their hair out.
Me from India - Major changes on IN datacenter rest all is normal looks like minor changes here and there...
Google should close down the engine if its going to serve all "Spam Site" in its results and earn only from "Good Sites" via PPC
if i search allinanchor:keyword and allintext:keyword and i get #1 in both results, my site will be ranked #1? searching for keyword?
im asking that coz im getting listed #1 using allinanchors and allintext, but in google results im listed #38.
hope someone can answer that question :D
it really looks as though this is it...here we go again....can i start the ball rolling?...ok..here goes....
GOOGLE IS BROCKEN!
[edited by: soapystar at 9:38 am (utc) on Nov. 17, 2003]
For me everything seems to be there where it was last week and I still wonder what you guys are discussing about for all this time - 600+ posts... :-S
Me from India - Major changes on IN datacenter rest all is normal looks like minor changes here and there...
Agreed. It looks just about identical to me too. None of my SERPs are any different. Only at the -in datacenter do I see any drastic difference. My overall hits are down probably 15% over the last few days though which suggests to me that maybe I can't see everything. I don't see how I can maintain the same SERPs as before and get a decrease in hits, unless the decrease is for the keywords I don't track. Or unless the users are being given different data than I'm being given on www.
Any small target sites are getting blown away in most cases also if your URL matches your anchor text this seems to have a big no no.
I manage 30 small sites (less than 200 pages) with targeted urls and anchor text that were ranked no 1 for 12 months that are now not in the top 500 listings.
They are still there in the allinanchor: command. But in the serps they have disappeared and from past experience if they are not there now they won't be there for another month at least, if ever.
Googleguy says there is no problem with this update, so its not going to be a case of the missing index pages returning like last time as far as I can tell.
I don't understand it, why would you rank a low level page over a small targeted site? Makes no sense!
I could do with Googleguy confirming that there is no problem with the index pages like last time. Because if there is there might be some hope for me and my business.
P.S
all the my sites still have there PR and innerpages still rank well. Just the index pages which have my keywords bring people to site which have disappeared.
GOOGLE IS BROKE!
or did you mean broken?;)
There is a company in our industry who have a very large network of sites interlinked, they also have many sites which differ slightly but offer the same products and they are certainly dominating the SERPs right now. They have anything from 4 - 6 sites in the top 10 for all our major searches.
Yeah, big time!
Do u think keyword URLs are a problem. I personally think long keyword URLs are bad (5+ word seperated by hyphens/underscores) but normally URLs with keywords in are a logical choice for a domain. I mean you're not going to buy a domain named blue_circles.com when you site gives information on/sells red_triangles.
Same applies to anchor text to some extent. A logical choice for anchor text would be something which reflects your site.
[edited by: needinfo at 9:56 am (utc) on Nov. 17, 2003]