Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Dominic - Part 2

         

teeceo

11:22 pm on May 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Continued from Part 1: [webmasterworld.com...]


Thanks to google for letting us peek into there database( they could very easy close that door to us)and a thanks to googleguy for "DONATING" his time to answer question(that he don't have to) and for keeping thing here (somewhat) calm. Also, thanks to all that work so hard to keep this forum going strong(I for one don't know how I would get along without it:). I could go on and on but, thats all I will say. Later.

teeceo.

GoogleGuy

6:16 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Fair question, born2drv. I would say a "Satisfied" right now, and looking forward to bringing in new data in that will make most of the webmasters here satisfied or better as well. I understand the questions that people are asking, but I can also see the new technology coming, and how that will improve the quality of Google.

rfgdxm1

6:16 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>Is it just me or does there seem to a significantly higher quotient of childish comments than is usual for an update-related thread?

Because there has never been such dissatisfaction with an update before. Usually, half like it, and half don't. In this case, the overwhelming majority dislike what they see on -sj.

born2drv

6:16 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Not the answer I was hoping for, but thank you for responding :)

Napoleon

6:19 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)



>> looking forward to bringing in new data in that will make most of the webmasters here satisfied or better as well <<

Which in my opinion is the moot point. SJ = new algo using incomplete 'data' (presumably links).

If that IS the case, I think eveyone can calm down and wait. It follows the logic of earlier GG posts.

[edited by: Napoleon at 6:19 pm (utc) on May 5, 2003]

jojojo

6:19 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



So if we aer doing very well in sj - then is it a bad sign - in otherwords once the other sites are brought back in I will get bumped down?

This 'slowly incorporating' new backlinks doesn't make sense :(

Stefan

6:19 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I'm not a big fan of this Google method of updating under normal circumstances; this time round it seems to be driving even more people crazy than usual. Ink and the others find my new pages quickly, put them in their serp's with no big fuss involved, and don't spring surprises on me.

GG, your efforts here are appreciated by everyone, thanks, but man, there has to be a better way of adding new pages and calculating serp's. This way lies madness :)

GoogleGuy

6:20 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Napoleon, chiyo, and mipapage, you're speaking with a wisdom that comes experience and from reading WebmasterWorld closely. :) Istvan, that's exactly the sort of thing that will be handled going forward.

Let me see if I can come up with a good metaphor..

markusf

6:20 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



GoogleGuy,

On the SJ index my yahoo backlinks all vanished from the yahoo directory, ODP etc, i also have several PR7 backlinks that aren't showing up. All in all i went from 26 good backlinks to 1, and this month i should have at least 50. I also had 800 pages crawled in march with the deepcrawl and 1500 pages in april, but in the SJ index i only have 300 some pages.

Also if you look at SERPS for my sites name and view results 160-390 all you see are pages and pages of links with no descriptions in the serps, i've never seen that happen before?

Markus

needinfo

6:20 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Napoleon
I agree totally.

Alphawolf

6:20 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



GoogleGuy,

mcavic, I think I did say that newer backlinks and spam snapshots would be pending to be applied over time. Or at least I tried to. :)

BUT.

Does that mean they simply aren't showing up, but are factored into the algorithm already?

OR...

As all the actual backlinks kick in, the PR factor/anchor text on link would change the SERP's?

All is cool with me and mine on SJ. I got a client from #34 on 'industry name' to #11 in SJ using all valid stuff.

And...all the links that we got for their site hasn't been factored yet.

Meaning, if they went from #34 to #11 and the additional links/anchor text has NOT yet been applied to the algo- it should go up a bit as the links are applied.

Must admit- I can't really figure what is up with this algo tweak.

I spot perhaps a different KWD sweet spot.?

As G is using another page for a SERP my client site was at #3 for now at #11 and #12 using a totally different page I didn't optimize for that phrase.

Odd stuff Google. You're gonna give the GoogleNews forum a bazillion posts on this update alone.

AW (happy I have not been reamed)

born2drv

6:24 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



GG - And I am excited for you guys too with your new technology even though my sites have suffered somewhat, I'm sure I can recover and move on, and I look forward to seeing the new index.

Just hope there is less spam in it :)

People that have knocked me down also have lots of guestbook links too. But the problem is, some only have guestbooks, so I'm not sure about the comment about you guys ignoring it yet.

I think 2 of the main changes in this algo are...

1) inbound links need to be more focused.... like 50 links all using different link text no longer work well for all different keyword phrases. but if you have 50 links all with the same link text, it is more effective, which I guess makes sense since it tends to be more on topic

2) on page factors count for more now, like title and kw density.

As for your new spam technologies, I hope they are very effective :)

mfishy

6:25 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I wonder how Google can test the sj index and claim they are satisfied without even factoring in new links though? New links would change what they were testing?

needinfo

6:26 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I think GG meant they are Satisfied SO FAR.

adsoft13

6:26 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



GG,

Thank you for the last post.
If this is partial data, which are used - then I'm very satisfied with the new also and eager to see it live ... as I have web sites, which are completely indexed in the -sj and they are doing more then fine :) However the sites, which has just some part of backlinks in -sj ... doing very bad, as you guess.

Napoleon

6:26 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)



And there you have it.... I think everyone can seriously relax now.

SJ is destined to change before it is widespread. Missing data will be added, which WILL have an impact on the results (remember: results = algo + data).

The data will be updated which will restore many of the links to the quality sites. The quality sites will thus climb to more appropriate positions with respect to the lesser quality sites.

Just give it time and wait.

For all anyone knows this is PRECISELY what normally happens behind the curtains. Come on... relax and wait.. change is afoot.

needinfo

6:30 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Napoleon
Good advice. I'm leaving my PC now and going to the pub because I have had all my questions answered and I trust Google to return good quality sites higher than crap sites.

GoogleGuy

6:30 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Just to clarify one thing, Napoleon, I'm not sure what the order will be on applying new data vs. SJ appearing more broadly. But I agree that it would help either way if everyone relaxed. :)

jojojo

6:31 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I've never seen a thread grow so fast - all I have to do is refresh every few minutes and I get 3-4 more new posts.

I'm not going to the pub - I am going to sit here for the next 5 days refreshing WW and go completely neurotic and do searches across all the datacenters all day long.

mrguy

6:32 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



--I wonder how Google can test the sj index and claim they are satisfied without even factoring in new links though? New links would change what they were testing?--

Not necessarily,

If they are only testing right now for on page factors, such as hidden text etc, then the backlinks wouldn’t make a difference.

They will probably phase those in with some other type of filter and then we will see the results sway again.

After reading GG's post, I think he is trying to tell us all to in a round about way to wait. This new algo change is going to be sweeping and they are trying to implement slowly so as not to kill good resources by accident.

I think, instead of getting all worked up about my links disappearing, I’m just going to go about working on my site and wait and see what happens.

I do have faith that Google does know what their doing and in the long run the SERPs will really benefit from this.

[edited by: mrguy at 6:33 pm (utc) on May 5, 2003]

mifi601

6:33 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



GG, does this mean ranking order WILL stay the same?!

d_fused

6:33 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



..: But I agree that it would help either way if everyone relaxed. :)

I tried to shout this out loud a couple of times and it simply doesn't work :)

Anyway, it is a lovely sunset out there and I am going for a beer down the beach :)

Anyone to join?

If we do bad after the update, well, another 20k will go in adwords :)

if we do well, another 20k might go in beer :)

so all I can do is wait.

See you folks.

GoogleGuy

6:34 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I hear you, jojojo. This thread has been growing almost too fast to keep up. Hit refresh and more questions to try to answer. :)

JudgeJeffries

6:34 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



What sort of time period are we talking about before everything is applied and the results settle down.......days...weeks?

Napoleon

6:35 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)



Loud and clear. The important thing for the guys on here though is that ultimately the data will be there and the quality links taken account of.

I don't think the order is that big a deal as it is temporary... I certainly think it WILL serve to create a few giant threads on here though. I hope Brett has his bandwidth allocation in place!

mfishy

6:35 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I can't help but wonder why Google would want to pt sj out without waiting first for new data? Oh well, guess we will wait and see.

mifi601

6:36 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



It is hard to relax, when you are talking livelihood, doing the right thing (according to this forum) and then be dropped ...

panos

6:36 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



"What sort of time period are we talking about before everything is applied and the results settle down.......days...weeks? "

good question!

twilight47

6:39 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I gotta catch this train before 20 more post are added in the next 47 seconds.
IMHO, I'm sure that sj will eventual go from standing for "Spam Junkie" to standing for "SEO Justice". Some times the wheels of justice take time... be it internet time or not.

mauijaws

6:39 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hi,

anybody else see this:
My site has been crawled nicely when checking sj, but
unfortunately a lot of pages do not have a cached version.
The results just show the URL; so no keywords indexed for
these pages. In the last two updates everything was allright?

Hopefully this eill change during the new update...

Ideas, anyone?

Regards,
mauijaws

PS: Might be a dumb question. Might be happened before, but
I have never seen this... but hey, its my first post. I am a
stupid newbie. I am allowed to do this ;-)

Perfection

6:43 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I know how it feels when Google's results don't look the way you want them to, but some people are acting as though the update just finished and what is on sj right now is now the current results on www and will be that way until next months update. It's not. Like Googleguy has said (like 100 times already) "relax."

He basically summed up what the sj results are. Sj is showing a new index that just isn't complete YET. Soon though, it will be. Until then, save Brett some money and go take a break. The "sky" can't be "falling" yet until the actual full, complete, and final update happens. Then by all means, let the sky fall if you must. Googleguy loves that part. =]

This 349 message thread spans 12 pages: 349