Update Jagger - Part 2

[Brett_Tabke]

Continued from
[webmasterworld.com...]

[cristinita]

I'm starting to see wild changes in the allinanchor command in 66.102.9.104 (not in normal SERPS though)

I just follow Spanish keywords, so if anybody can chech his/her sector would be appreciated

The effects for me may end up to be devastating...

Thanks

[Dayo_UK]

>>>Google technical have asked for an extension

Not really - No-one guaranteed Wednesday.

[Eazygoin]

Dayo_UK >>

As I am sure you are aware, the point of that post was to reiterrate the fact that Jagger 3 is not showing anywhere, just to hit back at all the speculation :-)

[Patrick Taylor]

People making announcements are maybe choosing their words carefully... "unleash" and "visible" could be understood in different ways. All I have really seen during the past week or so is that there are different results on different datacentres and that on rechecking any particular datacentre (the ones I've been looking at) there are changes this way and that.

<added>I've also noticed over the past 2 weeks that when I go into my stats and click on a Google referrer page link, the page that my logs say was hit is often on a completely different Google results page - higher or lower - or sometimes not visible anywhere.</added>

[edited by: Patrick_Taylor at 2:11 pm (utc) on Nov. 4, 2005]

[WebPixie]

I keep reading that people see two sets of results or three sets of results.

I'm seeing a lot more than that. Not alway major changes, but certainly for my site. Just checked a bunch of DCs and for my main search term my site was, 11, 14, 23, 33, 53, 64, 93, and 95 depending on the DC. I'm seeing a good deal of flux. Maybe the people seeing the two or three result sets are just looking top 10?

[reseller]

>>Matt Paines at ebusiness-strategies says on 3rd Nov.:
"Yesterday, after the announcement from Google that Jagger 3 would start Mid Week, the forums were a wash with people watching datacentres in the hope to spot the first one displaying the new search results. We find out today that Google technical have asked for an extension, Jagger 3 just ain't ready to unleash on the planet. ...I hope that means it's going to be good news!"<<

Should that be a joke, or what?

And who is that Mr. Matt "X-SEO" Paines whom hiding behind his blog? another retired SEO :-)

Matt! you want to say something, come here and lets discuss it.

Thanks!

[Yippee]

>> Matt! you want to say something, come here and lets discuss it. <<

Oh my virgin eyes! Reseller is picking a fight! I knew he had it in him ;)

One thing that is consistent in all my research on this update is that sites that rely heavily on internal linking schemas with next to nothing inbound links will suffer under the Jagger knife. In other words, if G sees you have a great site with no inbound links, there is a good chance that site will get a penalty. Seems kind of logical I would think. At some point someone would link to that site via natural linking, right? IF the general public can see it or navigate to it in the first place.

Another observation that KW stuffing continues to be a problem for G, which is why they need us to report it. This one will be interesting to see G solve.

[edited by: Yippee at 2:33 pm (utc) on Nov. 4, 2005]

[BradStevens]

>>Reseller: Matt! you want to say something, come here and lets discuss it.<<<

Why does he need to come here? Seems rather demanding to me. If you wish to respond to his comments, then contact him directly or navigate to where the man is posting the comments.

[dfre]

Why does he need to come here? Seems rather demanding to me. If you wish to respond to his comments, then contact him directly or navigate to where the man is posting the comments.

Yes. How dare he post something about google on his own blog!...especially when it contradicts Reseller's theories. ;)

[bether2]

http://207.68.172.246/
Must be Jagger 3

hehe. I haven't been checking all these data centers that people have been mentioning, but something about your post made me check this one.

Gave me a good laugh!