Update Jagger - Part 2

[Brett_Tabke]

Continued from
[webmasterworld.com...]

[StriderUK]

>>I can understand members not appearing in these DC's being frustrated, I feel your pain..... and chuckle :) <<

Why chuckle?

[Deester]

"I am beginning to feel like a senior citizen at a bingo parlor just waiting to scream it out.

Granted everything has been very useful in this jagger thread, but it's funny to see everyone (myself included) predicting the results. "

Although I don't post my predictions I do make them! I think its normal for webmasters to speculate a little.

[normasp]

Matt said

"November 3, 2005 @ 1:39 pm

Let’s see. Multiple data centers are now showing Jagger2, but I don’t think every data center is. I believe Jagger2 is at the cluster of data centers that includes 66.102.9.104.

In which place says Matt that?

[petehall]

216.239.53.99
216.239.57.99
66.102.7.99

I still don't think these are Jagger3 :-)

Either way I'm happy with any of the result sets... so can we pick one please and get on with our lives LOL!

[300m]

I agree, I am just as much a part of it as the next person.

I just can not help but laugh. No mal intent meant to anyone.

:)

[Eazygoin]

NormaSP >

Matt says it here [mattcutts.com ]

[300m]

I checked out a few DC this morning and I have noticed that the overall average for a particular page I am using as a gauge is showing back at it's normal ranking.

However, at this point, I have no idea if it will stick, but I think it might because its coming across the same on so many DC's.

I am going to assume this is J2 flux. Is that what the general concensus is?

[normasp]

Eazygoin

Thanks!

[petehall]

This is J2 --> 66.102.9.104

J3 isn't anywhere yet and I'm not going to post again until it starts either (honest).

[Eazygoin]

As GG said yesterday, they were going through the list of spam reports, and IMO Jagger3 won't start until they have been dealt with.
Going by the number they probably received, it may take a bit of time!