Update Jagger - Part 2

[Brett_Tabke]

Continued from
[webmasterworld.com...]

[grantmoney]

I disagree that 66.102.7.99 is a newer result for the simple reason i have 2 sites that were lifted from the new domain penality (sandbox or whatever) with jagger2. both don't appear using that dc with anything competitive. in fact, most of the datacenters people seem to assume are the newer ones look old to me.

the latest results i've found are on 66.102.9.99 as one of my target keywords has dropped from 10 to 17, but both sites still rank for fairly competitive terms.

i doubt any are jagger3, but the last set of jagger2 results (which have since disappeared) were pretty good in my opinion. i'm hoping they make a return with j3!

[Yippee]

I think many will argue that the SERPs on 66.102.7.99 are the newer ones. I don't believe there are contradictions here on that point. Whether that set will further change is another point.

[edited by: Yippee at 4:02 pm (utc) on Nov. 4, 2005]

[fredde]

Can you remember the serps on 66.102.11.99/ 66.102.9.99? This results vanished on Wednesday and didnt come back. Either that was Jagger2.5 or a temporary Jagger3.

[RunnerD]

I am fearing that was a temporary Jagger3 that we saw and was taken down quickly.

I hope not. It would be brutal to survive 1 and 2 and get slammed in what we saw.

[Mountdoom]

>>>> We find out today that Google technical have asked for an extension, Jagger 3 just ain't ready to unleash on the planet. <<<<

I guess we can assume from this big G aren't happy with what they are seeing in the test environment. It may be that they decide to drip feed J3 rather than open the flood gates (unless the elements are inter-dependent). If J3 is technically the most challenging of the 3 updates and the one they need to get right, does this make it the one with the biggest impact?

[Ankhenaton]

aaaaaaaaaaargh .. is this now over soon .. this is the Beethoven3 update ... outdated musician, possibly brilliant BUT as yet ->unfinished<- ...

[reseller]

BradStevens

">>Reseller: Matt! you want to say something, come here and lets discuss it.<<<
Why does he need to come here? Seems rather demanding to me. If you wish to respond to his comments, then contact him directly or navigate to where the man is posting the comments. "

And I thought Iīm among supporters :-)

Ok. I like blogs where people write what they wish. But what I donīt like is that those blog owners discuss, ON THEIR OWN TERMS, visitors comments. Not a fair or balanced discussion at all. Take a look at some popular blogs, and you shall see what I mean. Its really mostly a one-way discussion, where the blog owner can also delete comments which are not in accordance with what he/she wish to see on his/her blog.

Mr. Matt Paines has refered in his post to:

"... the forums were a wash with people watching datacentres ....."

Therefore I guess Mr. Paines wouldnīt mind at all to discuss what he wrote on forum 30, The Mother of All Forums. Here we have common TOS which apply for both of us and no one of us shall have any prior advantages.

[brokenbricks]

66.102.7.99 looks like pre jagger to me.

[greenfrog]

no...I think that Jagger is appropriate.

The guy is crusty, old, and everybody agrees that it's time for him to give it up. It is clear the real Jagger is going down kicking....just like this update.

[jaggerbugger]

Just to throw in my 10 pence worth, I'm hoping 'Reseller' is right & the following are the latest DC's / the way things are heading :

66.102.7.99
216.239.57.99
66.102.11.99

In my market (UK), the other DC's & the current ones being used throw up totally daft resuts. If I search for the type of 'Widget' that we sell (a very popular term) the #1 result is for the widget but powered by a hampster! - it's just ridiculous!. The next 10 / 20 results are then for Chineese suppliers of these 'Widgets', Amazon & all the other big companies.

Refreshing this forum for a new post is causing me RSI! - come on GG & MC, put us out of our misery!