Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Jagger - Part 2

         

Brett_Tabke

1:08 am on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Continued from
[webmasterworld.com...]

annej

1:29 am on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I know Jagger isn't done but I noticed something interesting today.

On the search for 'pioneer widgets' my article is usually first but today when I checked in on 66.102.9.104 the article is now third. Interestingly the page ahead of my page has (Pioneer widgets Website Coming Soon!) at the
top then a couple of paragraphs about a widget shop with the words 'pioneer widgets' near the top and the bottom.

The first thing that occurred to me is that having the key words next to each other in the title must be of greater importance now. My title is 'Pioneer widgetingpeople & Their Widgets'.

The other thing I'm noticing is that a short page with the search phrase near the bottom and top doesn't need much PR to rate well. Interesting. Maybe short introductions to article pages with all these features will do
better. Then it would link to the full article. Just a thought but perhaps things will be completely different when this update is over.

The worrisome thing about this is that writing the short blurb and never bothering with the real article would do just as well. I can just see the spammers jumping in to take advantage of that!

Hopefully GG and others from Google have noticed this.

BTW I don't care if my page is first or third. People will find it either way. But I will care when 10 automated spammy sites are ahead of my page.

minnapple

2:06 am on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Yikes!

Jagger 2 the sequel.

Well I might as well put my two cents in.

Inbound link knob turned up to high to fly in the long run. Trusted inbounds? Replicated by midnight.

Jagger 3 must hold some surprises, or this could be a yawn.

randle

2:11 am on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Yes, when it comes to the type of results seen on that data center, topical, light content articles or brief content pages, seem to be fairing quite well.

aliszka

2:18 am on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Someone erased my post, I'll say it again:

LOOKS LIKE G__GLE IS BROKEN! IMO

HORRIBLE, HORRIBLE SEARCH RESULTS! IMO!

driwashsolutions

2:26 am on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Just checked the allinanchor:gray widget (two words)on 66.102.9.104 and 216.239.37.99 (my DC) and they seem to be broken - or it appears that all the anchors have been erased for my site, which may lead to rankings.

Anyone else notice this?
Anyone see their allinanchor working and correlating to SERPS on 66.102.9.104?

Erku

2:27 am on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Is tomorrow morning Jagger 2 going to be all over the DCs?

zjacob

2:29 am on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)



I'm already looking forward to thread "Update Jagger - Part 3: The Final Insult". :)

sailorjwd

2:30 am on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Is it really broken? Are you sure? Are you sure?
Maybe its just bent or sleeping.

Are we there yet? Are we Are we?

aliszka

2:33 am on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



sailorjwd:

Don't take my word for it that G__GLE IS BROKEN, just pull up any search and notice all the horrible results!

Case Closed! IMO!

This 1222 message thread spans 123 pages: 1222