Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
For the sake of argument, I am suggesting to webmasters who have sites with little of no inbound links to get out there and get some or else I don't believe they will survive Jagger. The whole concept of natural linking leads me to think there exists a ratio for age/pages/links/etc for the various sectors at which a website accummulates inbound links. AND if a particular site is off that mark by a large margin, it gets penalized.
[edited by: Yippee at 5:49 pm (utc) on Nov. 4, 2005]
Then, once I am done that, I am going to tackle the blog sector and write blogs where I mention every possible word once on a page.
Then I'll start a huge directory where I charge $299 per year for a link, sell as many as possible and write arbitrary content, gathered from other sites, about anything under the sun, cars, property, travel and business.
(I forgot to add for the paragraph above that I would create a sub-domain for each sector.)
I'll call my huge network Goohoosoft.
I'll get a pagerank of 9. Make loads of cash. Never get penalized for selling links or duplicate content, or canonical issues.
Once that's done, I'll start a search engine that has an update everyday. Each update will take the very last result and put in the #1 position on the first update. 1 by one the last results will get a day at #1. Should be very fair to everyone.
Any finally before I retire, I'm going to hijack every single site on the web.
Wish me luck. I'm already in my 30s so I should be done by the time I am in my 40s.
Now where is my black hat and irrelevant content coat?
Early, GG said
I expect Jagger2 to start at 66.102.9.x. It will probably stay at 1-2 data centers for the next several days rather than spreading quickly. But that data center shows the direction that things will be moving in (bear in mind that things are fluxing, and Jagger3 will cause flux as well).
Matt and GG have mentioned explicitely that jagger 2 will take at place 66.102.9.104. How come people are still saying that 66.102.7.104 is the jagger 2 results? these 2 datacenters shows 2 totally different results. It seems like that people want Matt and GG to give directions but we are reluctant to accept new serps at 66.102.9.104 because some of us don't do well on those. We just take the datacenters that favors us and assume it is the direction google is heading towards. But I rather believe GG and Matt and also [mcdar.net...] You can see from the data that 66.102.9.104 indeed shows the most fluxes during the jagger 2 update. the other ones just stay the same from jagger 1.
If it happens to be true that 66.102.7.104 is the jagger 2 final result, then it means that Matt and GG lied to all of us. If it is indeed like what Matt and GG said that 66.102.9.104 is the jagger 2, then why would google use 66.102.7.104 for jagger 3? it doesn't make sense to have jagger 2 if you are not going to use it for the upcoming jagger 3.
Just my 2 cents. Would really appreciate if GG and Matt can tell us which datacenter will be used for jagger 3 so that we can all stop guessing :)
I would not use the word "penalized". You don't rank high because of the lack of links.
One of my sites got killed on the 9/22 update. According to the DC's that appear to be Jagger 2, that site is back in its position pre 9/22 update.
The weird thing is that ONLY my site is seeing flux on all of the DC's in the top 20 positions. And I was the ONLY site in my segment to get hammered on the 9/22 update.
I remember someone saying that 9/22 might have been a dup content penalty update. Anyone think its possible that G realized an error from the 9/22 update and tweaked it for what we call Jagger 2?
Just a thought...