Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Jagger - Part 2

         

Brett_Tabke

1:08 am on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Continued from
[webmasterworld.com...]

jkdt0077

11:17 am on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



On second thought yes its definitely not pre-jagger. You cant say its J3 though, possibly up to J2 on that one.

Dayo_UK

11:19 am on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)



>>>216.239.37.104

>>>This DC is definitely Jagger 3.

Lol - I assume that was a joke as everyone is saying such and such DC is jagger3.

That DC has been switching Jagger2 on and off for a while. (IMO - of course ;))

lukey

11:22 am on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Well I'm off to Oz next week for 3 weeks, and if it is jagger3 then I'm going to have a cracking holiday!

Luke

PS Also dong some business stuff out there, so anyone from Sydney or Melbourne that fancies meeting up get in touch.

Miop

11:22 am on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



My canonical url problem not fixed on 216.239.37.104, but is on .uk.

djmick200

11:23 am on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



For the others in the same boat as me who's troubles started on Sept 22nd.

Matt Said,
November 4, 2005 @ 2:41 am

sid, Sept 22nd was not a part of Jagger.

MHes

11:34 am on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>216.239.37.104
This DC is definitely Jagger 3

You wish.... but I think you are wrong.

cleanup

11:40 am on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



djmick,
So how do you interpret that statment by MC.

Not part of Jagger and therefore not addressed by Jagger3?

or a prejagger problem to be fixed as part of the Jagger updates..

I hope the latter.

[edited by: cleanup at 11:41 am (utc) on Nov. 4, 2005]

sailorjwd

11:40 am on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Only changes I'm seeing this morning are:

Site command is showing home page listed 1st for first time but it is the non-www version which is the wrong one.

Seems almost all supplementals are back in the site command but most all are listed last. So, the only thing positive is they are sorting the site command results properly.

taps

11:52 am on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



nothing moved for my keywords last night. Even the differences between datacenters for certain keywords are static.

The pagecount of my main site did not change either.

Ok, waiting for the storm...

djmick200

12:01 pm on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



cleanup

I don't think anything that happens in Jagger will change what happened on Sept 22nd.

Identifying the causes of the 22nd changes have made very difficult for us with the current update.

Yesterday gave me some hope though. In a previous post i said I'd compiled a spreadsheet outlining page structure for my site. eg pics have alt tags y or n, page title kw's etc. Anyway I had found a pattern but a couple of the sample pages I'd chosen were throwing the pattern out, yesterday those pages returned to the serps and the pattern is now looking better.

I must add that whatever happened on sept 22nd NEVER took down my whole site, it definately isn't a site wide penalty. I still come no.1 for several kw's and phrases.

I renamed all my page titles, removed recent links and some other stuff but no improvement to talk about. still 16k a day down. I decided to work on other stuff just now until jagger settles as other jagger changes may require additional reworking of pages. I am confident I will get my site back to where it was before Xmas.

added: I believe the sept 22 problem is in regard to repititious kw's & kw phrases in title, description, url and on page.

This 1222 message thread spans 123 pages: 1222