Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Jagger - Part 2

         

Brett_Tabke

1:08 am on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Continued from
[webmasterworld.com...]

Yippee

8:53 pm on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>> Presumably the J2 (66.102.11.99 and the like) have tweaked something in regards to back-links and perhaps google-bombing.

As most know, if you typed FAILURE in G you got the bio of GWB. On the J2 DC's this seems to be corrected.

Just a thought that J2 might center around back-link quality, relevance etc... <<

Agree 100%... Again, if you are weak on links, you shouldn't be spending too much time in here looking at DCs and praying. Instead, you should be out there shaking down sites for links.

[edited by: Yippee at 8:55 pm (utc) on Nov. 4, 2005]

steveb

8:53 pm on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



"Then why were the updates not started simultaneously from the beginning?"

You can see why now. They are doing all sorts of mix and matching. Obviously you couldn't do that if you just dumped one completed thing on top of another completed thing.

petehall

8:55 pm on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



steveb... please help me my brain is about to melt... :-/

Dayo_UK

8:55 pm on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)



Steve - do you see it though.

Logic order - Homepage followed by Cached pages - supplementals at the bottom ;)

petehall

8:56 pm on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



This ordering I am talking about - is really only consistent on 66.102.9.104 & 66.102.11.104 at the moment (so not all Jagger2s)

I'm liking these IPs. Not as much as my red wine though...

Phil_AM

8:56 pm on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Just a thought, would G ever use two different sets of SERPS and rotate them through the DC's? Perhaps both are relevant and each tend to a different type of searcher.

Why else would G do 2 updates (let alone 3) back-to-back that are supposed to be mutually exclusive.

In essence, why rearrange your furniture one way to create more light in the room, then the next day rearrange the furniture to allow better airflow and have both rearrangements be completely separate of each other. It would only make sense if you planned on having two separate rooms.

From Matt's blog:

"Paul, the objective of Jagger is to improve our index results. The three stages are actually three independent launches."

- Just trying to think outside the box...

Atomic

8:56 pm on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



66.102.11.104

Wow. That one is hot and really, really likes every one of my sites. Almost anything I search for has me at or near #1. And traffic has been so great today I lowered all my AdWords bids to almost nothing. I hope this continues and doesn't turn out to be a tease.

zikos

9:09 pm on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)



66.102.9.104
66.102.11.104
I think so too

macdave

9:12 pm on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Dayo_UK

I noticed the same changes earlier on 66.102.9.99. Our non-www homepage has finally disappeared on that DC and the others you mentioned, but [site:mysite.com] is still returning the same random order as other DCs. (While a few other sites I looked at do have their homepages first on the DCs mentioned and not on others.) Not sure what the practical ramifications are, but it's nice to see that Google can maybe sort out what pages are most important within a single site.

JuniorOptimizer

9:12 pm on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Analyzing Cutt's terse statements is quite a tough job.

He's not the Jagger of Search, he's more like the Greenspan of Search :)

This 1222 message thread spans 123 pages: 1222