Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Jagger, Google Update Oct 18th, 2005

When can we expect a new PR update?

         

jretzer

5:33 pm on Oct 18, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Continued from here:
[webmasterworld.com...]



Anyone have any guesses as to when we can expect a new systemwide PR update?

reseller

7:58 am on Oct 28, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



cleanup

>>"without risking collateral damage"!

You are joking. Do you think all the people complaing about getting caught in the Jagger crossfire are making it up!<<

Maybe I should have been more specific and wrote, instead:

"without risking huge collateral damage" ;-)

>>By the way thank for telling us about your nth spam report, that is so interesting. How about telling us the sites you reported and the results. That may be more helpful. Thank you. <<

Well .. fortunately Google has no automatic spam sites removal, so I expect dealing with spam reports might take some time.

I have done my part of the "deal". The rest is up to Google WebSpam Team.

Dayo_UK

8:00 am on Oct 28, 2005 (gmt 0)



cleanup

Sounds like Canonical url problems - as I said just sent you sticky.

Next week is the week to watch.

reseller

8:01 am on Oct 28, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Dayo_UK

Good morning Dayo.

>>Next week is the week to watch. <<

Jagger3 for canonicals & Supplementals ;-)

Dayo_UK

8:04 am on Oct 28, 2005 (gmt 0)



Yes, reseller - but there was a little Canonical fix at the end of Bourbon - remember clint - he had the problem and his site was fixed.

Eg. They did not fix the whole problem, just recently effected sites. But to be fair GG,MC did not really call it a canonical url change/fix. (just hinted that sites with clint like problems :))

and I guess they have had longer to work on it now.

Soooooo - fingers,legs and eyes crossed that it is a proper fix :)

WebPixie

8:09 am on Oct 28, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Good stuff Cain, I also follow the wedding market and I'm seeing very similar results.

I'd only add that directories are moving up as well, behind top teir sites.

reseller

8:09 am on Oct 28, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Dayo_UK

>>Yes, reseller - but there was a little Canonical fix at the end of Bourbon - remember clint - he had the problem and his site was fixed<<

Yes I remeber Clint. But also recall that EFV had same problem, and it seems that it was fixed too. Right EFV?

P.S. On my way to my dentist for a "teeth cleansing". Better than a "Teeth replacement", I guess :-)

[edited by: reseller at 8:14 am (utc) on Oct. 28, 2005]

Dayo_UK

8:11 am on Oct 28, 2005 (gmt 0)



Yes Reseller

I think if you catch it early you tend to be alright (and EFV had high PR on the other domain of his site - in his case the www - which might help the early release of the fix)

But I think the problem sets in.

Anyway - hopefully by the end of next week I have nothing to talk about.

MHes

8:16 am on Oct 28, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Dayo_UK

So your saying that we might have a Canonical problem, which has caused no problems until this update.... which is supposed to be fixing it?

Does that make sense?

Dayo_UK

8:20 am on Oct 28, 2005 (gmt 0)



Well Yes - sort of. As I said in my sticky Google must have visited your non-www homepage to list so much of your site under the non-www - even if the homepage is not listed at the moment.

Each update/change more sites get effected by the problem. The two updates so far AFAIK - were not designed to fix the problem.

GG indicated Canonilization (sp) changes are to be expected so that is the hope.

Obv. I am in the same boat and very much hoping that it is sorted - but until next week all we can do is wait :(

I will send you another sticky - as I dont think I sent it yesterday.

Strider

8:38 am on Oct 28, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



guys which DC's apart from 66.102.9 seem to have the jagger2

sorry just up from a *VERY* troubled sleep.

been dreaming about losing all my projects at jagger3 :)

This 930 message thread spans 93 pages: 930