Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Jagger, Google Update Oct 18th, 2005

When can we expect a new PR update?

         

jretzer

5:33 pm on Oct 18, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Continued from here:
[webmasterworld.com...]



Anyone have any guesses as to when we can expect a new systemwide PR update?

edd1

1:05 am on Oct 28, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Are we still on Jagger 1 or 2 or 3. I haven't checked in for a while so I wasn't sure.

Someone mentioned flashbacks - maybe we've skipped the Jaggers and we're onto Richards now.

aliszka

1:07 am on Oct 28, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



we are not on jagger, we are now on DAGGER!

Abigail

1:11 am on Oct 28, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



" we are not on jagger, we are now on DAGGER! "

Big Time!

Garya

1:14 am on Oct 28, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



adwords special update.

aliszka

1:24 am on Oct 28, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



People:

Just think about it, you have this Cl_wn G__leG_y coming on here acting as a good source of communication to webmasters and at the same time hurting so many webmasters to the point of gonesville, is that someone who really cares about you?

One Answer, H_ll No

All in my opinion of course!

Abigail

1:29 am on Oct 28, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I just searched out my pet keyword and found the same website listed 4 times in the first 30 results - #1, #11, #21, #30 - isn't that interesting?!

aliszka

1:33 am on Oct 28, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>I just searched out my pet keyword and found the same website listed 4 times in the first 30 results - #1, #11, #21, #30 - isn't that interesting?!<

I bet it was a large company or a directory, you know the one that could be found in a phone book or something that people who are searching already know about right?

of course, because that leaves the PPC spots available to collect the MONEY!

IMO!

futuresky

1:34 am on Oct 28, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



As much as I dislike the way google seems to be going, I'd rather have him (Googleguy) here than no-one at all. At least he's a human voice from actually inside the creature that is google.

[edited by: futuresky at 1:38 am (utc) on Oct. 28, 2005]

Hollywood

1:34 am on Oct 28, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I just sent someone a sticky saying the same aliszka!

===
-We send google stuff (Spam reports ¦ posts ¦ etc) that help them directly.
-Google is on here each night asking for stuff from us to report DIRECTLY to them, to help them DIRECTLY
-What have they directly helped any of you here with.
===

Key point is the term directly, this aint no keyword term.

I ask you all this, what directly have they helped us with on any personal level directly? Maybe I am wrong and anyone can sit me down and smack me (smiling - only ladies though) but are there any accounts of direct help for any of us?

Definition:
adv.
In a direct line or manner; straight: The road runs directly north.
Without anyone or anything intervening: directly responsible.
Exactly or totally: directly opposite.
At once; instantly: Leave directly.
Candidly; frankly: answered very directly.
Chiefly Southern U.S. In a little while; shortly: He'll be coming directly.

Amen - Back to my trance jam session and some beer - BIG cheers all in Poland, Holland, Italy and the rest!

[edited by: Hollywood at 1:44 am (utc) on Oct. 28, 2005]

djmick200

1:41 am on Oct 28, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



" I just searched out my pet keyword and found the same website listed 4 times in the first 30 results - #1, #11, #21, #30 - isn't that interesting?! "

Ive been seeing this for maybe 2 weeks now and the sites sure can't be found in yellow pages or phone books or whatever it was someone suggested.

Total online sites.

This 930 message thread spans 93 pages: 930