Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
66.102.7.99 A
216.239.57.99 B
I just checked those two for a couple of keywords and the results were 100% identical for the first page.
Dude, I am not talking rank here. I am talking staying alive period. I disagree with you on the lack of links point. I don't think ranking is entirely based on inbound links, however, it does have a big impact (quality and/or quantity links, you pick). G's hardwork on PR (which is based on links) might be going to the back burner while they tinker with TR, but you can bet your fannie it's not going away. G invested way too much in it to shelf it. It's still valid and viable component to factor in.
Pretty much every comparison of allinanchor and rankings I have ever done has been fairly close. There are always exceptions, but you can always see a heavy correlation in google between ranks and allinanchor. So I think you might be too dismissive of backlinks as a major component for rankings.
Quite the contrary, I think they are still relevant and important. Walkman was saying that you dont need many links to rank high. I was saying you need links to survive this update. I think we were talk 2 separate issues.
>>Nevermind, lets not crash the DC try to see the changes... appears to have stabilized
[edited by: spaceylacie at 7:01 pm (utc) on Nov. 4, 2005]
Could you please check allinanchor seraches @ 66.102.9.104 (or .99)...they're completely different to yesterday's and a tremendous change from anything I've seen in the last 6 months
However regular searches have not varied at all...
Pls do the exercise and let me know...
Pls do the exercise and let me know...
In my sector, I see no difference in the allinanchor on this DC. It appears to be the same as any other.
