Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
For me 66.102.9.104 is excellent news - not as good as pre-jagger, but not a business buster! Strangely I don't see similar results on a lot of the other DCs (through McDar) or on resellers other J3 candidates i.e. 216.239.53.99 // 216.239.57.99 // 66.102.7.99 . I'm going to enjoy my breakfast while I've got it.
For the first time, I see now a new serps for my testing keyphrases on these 4 Dcs. This hasnīt been there for few hours ago. And as Dayo_UK mentioned correctly, command site:www.mysite.dk shows my home page on top of the listings, while all other DCs showing secondary pages at top of the listings. Which means some improvements in canonicals issue.
66.102.11.99
66.102.11.104
66.102.9.99
66.102.9.104
So maybe Jagger3-2 is on its way, keeping in mind that Jagger3-1 was first noticed on these 3 DCs :-)
216.239.53.99
216.239.57.99
66.102.7.99
I used to have a little script that redirected those with adblockers to a "why you can't see my site" page. One day, someone who I invited to see my site had their adblocker on and was redirected. They let me know what I could do with my invitation. Since then I removed the redirect. I have my standards and I like to keep the high moral ground too, but the cost had become too great. My little piece of mind didn't justify what I was doing.
Why not just come up with a method to overwrite content you would prefer removed in some way. There's got to be a way to do that. For instance, what happens if you have a post that you want to delete forever. Currently, there is not a noarchive tag on the page. So you change the content of the page, add the noarchive tag, and submit the url (since ww url's get crawled so rarely). What is the effect of a noarchive tag added to a url retroactively? Wouldn't the cache be removed forever. That might not stop archive.org from indexing the content prior to the tag, but the noarchive tag won't stop any bad bot anyway.
Anywho, it really ticks me off when I can't find content that I am responsible for.
Those DCs like 66.102.9.104 are in flux though - last night more sites were showing homepage first for site search followed by normal pages - and then supplementals last.
This is not the case at the moment - some sites yes.
I guess GG/MC may want to let it settle before commenting.
The DCs you mention are definitely moving a bit, so have few other DCs as well. I am afraid, none are moving so much that we may term it as Jagger3. May be the tail of flux of the last update. Matt said somewhere, Jagger3 will adress general indexing issues, which I guess is a larger scenario that also addresses canonical and supplementals issues. I doubt when Jagger3 sets in, things will move quite differently than they have been all the while.
tigger, I am sure you have been here long enough to panic in the middle of an update, knowing there is more to come. My gut feeling, you will have a different story when all these ends. Best wishes.
Best of luck Tigger.
But I can't see this as G way of trying to filter sites
Note to all
Can we not mention the A word as against the terms here, anyone wanting to discuss this could we refer to that term as Pink widgets
">I agree with.....Reseller (for once ;-)
LOL
When you make as many predictions and claims as Reseller you have to agree with him once in a while :) "
Cīmon MHes..give me a break :-)
Honestly, if you go back to all update threades since Allegra, you shall see that I'm the one who makes less predictions regarding the DCs than the rest of other kind fellow members who watch the DCs.
[edited by: reseller at 9:11 am (utc) on Nov. 5, 2005]
[66.102.9.104...]
Well for the keywords I am watching.
Regarding the "A" word. We can't say affiliate anymore?;)