Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Jagger - Part 2

         

Brett_Tabke

1:08 am on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Continued from
[webmasterworld.com...]

randle

3:30 pm on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Seeing three very distinctive sets of results now.

216.239.57.105

64.233.161.99

66.102.11.104

almar

3:31 pm on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Cobain6:

Considering our legit site is beening buried deeper and deeper into the the neverlands of man eating spam, don't you think that that this jagger update should really have been named, cobain6? As in 6 feet under!

reseller

3:32 pm on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Dayo_UK

>>Although reseller we might still be on Canonical Eve & Therefore time for a drink!<<

Shouldn't we wait for GG & Matt to join us :-)

I can hear the footsteps of Jagger3...

fredde

3:50 pm on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)



<<Shouldn't we wait for GG & Matt to join us :-)

Maybe they have a real great party right now listening to the Stones...and the Update is just a joke ;)

iszatmary

3:56 pm on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)



"Seeing three very distinctive sets of results now.
216.239.57.105

64.233.161.99

66.102.11.104"

216.239.57.105 - is showing the old/not- updated results

So my feeling is the other two 64.233.161.99 or 66.102.11.104 are the candidates for Jagger 2 and Jagger3.

I hope is 66.102.11.104.

voltrader

4:01 pm on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member




Does anyone have seen Europeforvisitors?
He is down again while his spamy competitor is up...
check at munich travel and munich accommodation...

I actually think that the site at #1 is pretty good. Navigation is easy, design and colors are pleasing, and most importantly information is relevant. You're calling it spammy?

Phil_AM

4:01 pm on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



ISZ,

I hope quite the opposite!

That DC has me nowhere to be found!

DumpedbyG

4:02 pm on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Dayo_UK,

How would you know/verify the the Canonical problem has been fixed?

followgreg

4:02 pm on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



66.102.11.104 would be a better candidate, the others are showing old results, looks cleaner from where I stand.

leeds1

4:03 pm on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



interestingly I am seeing new results on

[64.233.161.147...]

after I refresh a couple of times and get the larger results returned

Other DCs I see results from before

This 1222 message thread spans 123 pages: 1222