Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
Nobody seems to look for news during hurricanes so it's just normal that traffic on such portals should drop during tough times.
Couldn't prove it by abc,nbc,cbs, or msnbc
I would assume people would revert in intense crisis to news channels they trust more and that are primary sources and not secondary.
Heard it on Yahoo or BBC, BBC would still be more credible. Maybe I am getting old :¦ ;)
The dip was very clear, exactly on rita, dip on msn, yahoo, and google.
Usually this stuff is really hard to get figured out, that wasn't one of the things though, if this was jagger related then why would all 3 search engines dip at the same time, september 21 ish? Recall that Rita was cat 5 before it landed. People left, they'd just seen what happened when people didn't leave.
And as you note, the news sites didn't dip, which I'd also expect, since more people are logging in for news, so the regional absence + more other views equals no real change.
You would then be surprised about the lack of said massive drop on Yahoo for the August 29 event in New Orleans call Katrina, yes ¦ no?
You are not expecting me to actually look at the data before throwing out a hypothesis..? :\ ;)
And as you note, the news sites didn't dip, which I'd also expect, since more people are logging in for news, so the regional absence + more other views equals no real change.
Exactly you have to offset the people who couldn't look at any news channels vs the ones that were extra viewers in other regions. :)
Any clue what they are waiting for? Still testing, reviewing spam reports.
One thing new though - Googlebot seems to eat up Javascripts!
Not sure what it means but we might be onto surprises soon.
Well, actually it's not the first time it was reported but for some reason it seems to target .js on specific crawls.
Is there anyway Matts trip could coincide with the launch perhaps? would be good timing I would think. Pity Im thousands of miles away in Africa, would really enjoy a chat.
Well strange going on:-
1. The Fresh and Cache dates are screwy.
2. Cache has disappeared for some pages.
3. Anyone else seeing Googlebot visit, get a 200 request but no data being transferred?
4. The ordering that was on the two Jagger3 DCs has gone astray again for a lot of sites.
GG, you said you would send requests out for Canonlization reports sometime - wanting these yet?
Looks like they are busy tweaking to me.
Me and my english.. hahaha
Thanks for your correction.. I think that I'm not boring..
So has anyone done anything yet?
I've removed some text that "could" have triggered a dupe penalty problem (unfortunately I had a small disclaimer on the bottom of every page) PRATT!
set up a 301 for non-www
and so far thats it as I don't want to make too many changes until I see the results from what I've done so far
Cant see anything that would stop Googlebot crawling - nothing in robots.txt
Where did you find the problem for your site.
The page in question where G is not getting any data but recieving a 200 has not changed at all since the last Gbot visit - but then it should shows as a 304.
Also it does not happen everytime G requests the same page.
I don't remember the exact reason. But I think it was some light cloaking issue.
I have some code that prevents creating a session as soon as a bot is identified. Thus no Session-ID will be created - and we all know what Google will do as soon as it receives Session IDs attached to URLs.
After implementing some more session data the bug simply sent an empty page when identifing a bot.
By monitoring my log after applying the new code I found that problem relatively quickly and fixed it.
Gbot does visit the page daily so I will make a change to the page and see what happens tomorrow.
It just looks like a 200 is being returned instead of a 304.