Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
Over and done with?
All done all through?
definitively better but site:example.com looks like an old result. :\
Not really seen that much improvements (if there are any they are very small at the moment)
I am confident it is a problem with the homepage that then filters down to effect the rest of the site in my case.
I had a problem with non-www homepage being indexed - ever since my homepage has not ranked even on the most obscure searches.
I notice poor SERPS again on these 2 DC's, and the site: command shows the old unorganised results..
The 2 jagger3 DC's were showing a much more organised site: command layout..
Is anyone else seeing that jagger3 DC's have reverted?
You are correct, J3 is gone.
But this is not the first time, and it always came back
This has got to be a rewind - the serps on 9 now resemble 7 from earlier in the week.
Given that GG / MC both flagged up that the 9 we have been seeing for 7 days was going to be the final result and would spread - what the hell is going on now.
Not happy - the J3 9 was sweet
I hope its temporary, because these results look very much like the distaster that was jagger2.
Bring back Jagger3!
irrelevant results, by google, over and over and again.
reminds me so much of the "spam crusades" of
- infoseek
- altavista
- excite
where are they all now?
gone, long ago . . .
google is killing itself, blinded by arrogance.
have seen this play before - deja vu . . .
it is a play with no happy ending.
it is only a matter of time.
(estimate: 3-4 years)
hard to believe?
well, it was also hard to believe at the time for the aforementioned, but proved true.
why? their search results really stank,
the "emperors" were really naked,
but, at the time, they still were worth billions . . .
internet bull, really . . .
heisje
.
[edited by: heisje at 8:38 pm (utc) on Nov. 12, 2005]
I see that you are "enjoying" the FLUX :-)
This is not your flux you are looking for, it is jagger 2, G has removed from the load balanced pool on "9" the servers serving up the J3 results, they did this the other night before rolling out J3 to more datacenters, and IMHO this is what is happening now. I would not consider this your Flux.
Back to watching (webmasterworld)
WW_Watcher
>>Is this a FLUX or a revert? <<
I guess its a FLUX, during which the serps might look as anything you know and you don't know :-)
Give it 1-2 weeks or so and it will be more stable.
This is not your flux you are looking for, it is jagger 2, G has removed from the load balanced pool on "9" the servers serving up the J3 results, they did this the other night before rolling out J3 to more datacenters, and IMHO this is what is happening now. I would not consider this your Flux.
Across the board, my results are different - not just a tweak with the odd result
Im with you WW_Watcher - maybe its part of the roll out. Maybe they are just jerking our chain
What a way to spend your saturday night - is it 9 - is it 7 - is it a roll back - a roll out? Who the heck knows. Just turn all the dials at the same time and end the pain G.
>>Reseller, in your ultimate wisdom
This is not your flux you are looking for, it is jagger 2, G has removed from the load balanced pool on "9" the servers serving up the J3 results, they did this the other night before rolling out J3 to more datacenters, and IMHO this is what is happening now. I would not consider this your Flux. <<
In conection to Jagger3, FLUX might be described as the state of everchanging serps on the DCs for a limited time period after the end of Jagger3.
However, and as I mentioned in previous post today, I have a feeling that the folks at the plex are still working on improving the final results of Jagger3. Something like tweaking during the FLUX.
And I know that the dog ate Jagger3 for a short time the other morning (my local time - GMT+1). But we are not talking about the disappearance of Jagger3 for hours or days.
Therefore the FLUX is more relevant to describe the general situation at present.
[edited by: Kangol at 9:09 pm (utc) on Nov. 12, 2005]
<< FLUX might be described as the state of everchanging serps >> = "everflux"
I would describe the process of rolling out J3 to other datacenters as the rollout of J3 to other datacenters.
We will see what we will see. Only time will tell.
Back to watching
WW_Watcher
"Reseller
<< FLUX might be described as the state of everchanging serps >> = "everflux"
I would describe the process of rolling out J3 to other datacenters as the rollout of J3 to other datacenters. ""
EVERFLUX happen between two updates.
FLUX follow an upadte for a limited time.
>>I would describe the process of rolling out J3 to other datacenters as the rollout of J3 to other datacenters.<<
That process has nothing to do with FLUX or EVERFLUX.
