Forum Moderators: open
But my last name is very uncommon, in fact close to unique (very few families), and none of my relatives has the same first name. So for my full name I totally dominate the SERPs.
First name obvious from my nic, last name equally obvious from my profile site URL. Note spelling of first name!
I had some competition, but not a lot. #1 is a name on a gravestone, though. I hate getting bumped by geneology sites. Argh!
I'm #3 for one of my online tags. 1 and 2 are archived Usenet posts of mine. <whine>How can a lousy Usenet archive daughter page (with jillions of pages, probably) have better PageRank than me?</whine> (Okay, I know I have pretty lousy PR for that particular site, but still. Seems like I should have at least beat them on relevance.)
I can't find myself for "berli" . . . it's probably in there somewhere, but I kind of abandoned the site a long time ago, so I don't really care.
:-)
and for my first name "Harish" (very popular name in South Asia), I'm #36. It throws up a friend's page who has my photo in it with just my name "Harish".
I guess I'm pretty high, amn't I? :-)
who won the contest? ;-)
For my full name I'm #3,4,5,6, and 8, and if I add the underscore between my first and last names, my WebmasterWorld profile comes up #1. So yes, Google does index underscores.
Actually it's a mystery to me why this page does so well on other poetry searches. It has only two links from outside the site (showing as backlinks in Google) and those pages are only a PR4 and PR5) The rest is about 54 interior links (some are PR6) which shows interior linking must make a big difference.
Naturally, a common name, the no1 will be the ones
with the most links pointing to it I presume.
I suggest putting a unique nickname or whatever
that makes sense to get no.1
Do people really get tonnes of traffic
from people just searching who have the same name as them?