Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Dominic - Part 4

         

Luke_SR

2:16 am on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Continued from: [webmasterworld.com...]


www2.google.com and www3.google.com have the new -sj results.

Update is on :)

jojojo

11:52 am on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



also I did see one of my results in sj- change from #10 to #9... has anyone else seen a change in sj- results like this?

Dayo_UK

11:53 am on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)



JoJoJo -

I have seen movements - nothing more than what you would expect with normal everflux

edneil

11:58 am on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Interesting Brett hasn't changed the title to 'official update' thread. I think it answers most questions in one fail swoop!

shaadi

12:00 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



i am not seeing any change for sj- yes lots with fi- and now thinking off just going for a ride ....

leef50

12:03 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



well i am gutted. for some reason, my site which has enjoyed first place rankings for kw1 kw2 kw3 has now gone totally. A search on my company name even shows that most of my backlinks are showing above me and my contact page is shown at 7th. this is consistent on all servers except www obviously. why have the google gods hurt me this way? I have not changed nowt.

annej

12:04 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Could it be that pages are ruled out, if keywords appear in the text above a certain limit? I am not talking of only keywords, I am talking of a text using a keyword very often because it is best description of facts.

This could account for my drop. Looking at the top sites on sj the key word in the title still seems to help but not as much. Shoot, there is a site titled 'under construction' ahead of me!

I have a hard time keeping the density of my top keyword down as it makes for awkward sentences to leave it out. If it really proves that this is a problem I'll have to to some careful rewriting.

Dayo_UK

12:05 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)



Leef50...

On previous updates when I have seen the new index - I have thought "thats it the position will not change that much until finally showing full time on live."

Dont know if it will be the same with this update - there maybe a long way to go yet.

ncsuk

12:16 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Also Leaf if you leave a site and dont change anything eventually it is going to drop down on teh basic google wil visit it rarely and wont deem it very important.

leef50

12:18 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



but what if you have a site that sells things that dont change? Why would you need to change it? Does it mean I need to re-word my site all the time?

Dayo_UK

12:26 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)



ncsuk..

Not sure on that one - it might lead to less freshbot visits but even that has not been proven....

swones

12:27 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



leef50

You're not alone, I am also in the same position, my site is clean, previously enjoyed some good positions and now it's gone, I'm just hoping that it will come back when everything shakes out. The most worrying thing is that none of my competitors sites have gone. It's worth noting that I am seeing freshbot at the moment popping in and grabbing a few pages at a time, dunno if that's a postitive sign or not from what others have said in the past. i.e. site greybarred or pr0 but freshie still trawls them every few days. I'm still showing as PR5 BTW, well... for the moment anyway!

Simon.

leef50

12:39 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



swones

Yes same here, all competition is still there but not me :( I have seen googlebot in my logs and it was looking for some old old pages (2 months old +) but I have since added permanent redirects to the pages not found. I too have PR5 still.

In addition, when I looked as -sj initially about 3 days ago when it started getting wierd results, my site had jumped to third in the list so I was optimistic. Now its gone it seems for no apparent reason.

What are the chances that it will return?

nutsandbolts

12:40 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I said the same thing earlier Leef about my main page disappearing (index.php) but some other pages like the the contact or privacy page indexed at around position 7 or further down. Weird!

HagenArnold

12:41 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hi All,
I seem to be in the same position as many of the others. It seems I have some previously very high ranking pages that have disappeared totally.
"Blue IceCream" page was ranked #2
"Tall Trees" page was ranked #4
Now both pages are simply "gone". It took 9 months following Brett's recipe to get to that point. I hope this is not the real dance.

Hagen

ncsuk

12:41 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Well since this all started i've had another 38 pages picked up so im happy.

Why you guys have lost pages I cannot fathom a guess too :(

leef50

12:42 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



well, its funny you said index.php since my site is all php... maybe this has something to do with it? Its just wierd but when you depend on google to feed you and your family it kinda becomes critical that this sorts itself out.

UK_Web_Guy

12:45 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Unlike the "Normal" update when SERPS on WWW2 & 3 are pretty much what you see on the live site - I think we will be seeing major changes to fi & sj before we start to see what will resemble the new index.

GG stated this will be the case

From what i have seen, pages that are not targeted to specific keywords are appearing high in the SERP's just because they contain the phrase once on the page?

If only it was that easy to rank for a particular keyword!

dvduval

12:46 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



After over two years at number 1 for the most important phrase on my most important site, this is the first time I have ever dropped to #2. I am hoping there are changes remaining before the update rolls over to www.

If not, I look forward to reading the "serious update thread".

pixelcow

12:50 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)



Hmm, you are talking of "results from www2 and www3"

BUT: they are the same as "www-sj" as far as I can see this. Or am I wrong?

Look at the following:

PING www.google.com (216.239.37.99)
PING www2.google.com (216.239.35.100)
PING www3.google.com (216.239.35.100)
PING www-sj.google.com (216.239.35.100)

The ping-reply times are nearly twice as a high as to google.com - but this could be because I am pinging from a high-traffic virtual server...

Greetings from Austria & hello all on this list (btw)

[edited by: pixelcow at 12:59 pm (utc) on May 6, 2003]

mfishy

12:54 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Uk Web Guy,

GG actually stated that they would probably roll out the index as is before adding any recent backlinks

Eric_Lander

1:13 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Doesn't seem all that fresh to me yet... Perhaps it's just the SERPS I'm looking at though,

hetzeld

1:27 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



AFAIC, the SERPs on www-fi show may 4th fresh dates for my main keyword phrase... I'm really happy with my #2 out of 4.5M ...

Please GG, leave it "as-is" , I don't mind my lost backlinks!:)

Dan

swones

1:39 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



My working theory is that google have "rolled back" to a much older data set, a "last known good" configuration if you like, that they were happier with and now they are going to let freshie refill it using the new "improved" algo? That would explain why a lot of people say they are seeing really old data plus some new stuff which is getting added very quickly after freshie spiders it. That's perhaps why GG keeps saying it will take a while for it to all come into place. Personally I'm now being spidered quite thoroughly by freshie. This might make up the new system of continuous rolling update that the more experienced posters have been hinting at. If I now make a miraculous resurrection into the results then I guess that might prove part of what I'm thinking. I'll let you know it if happens! hehe

trillianjedi

1:41 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Swones,

If that were the case, why did google bother doing a deepcrawl two weeks ago?

TJ

worker

1:47 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Theory: The DMOZ and Yahoo links are either seriously devalued, or they havent' been rolled back into the mix yet.

Sites that have ruled the roost on certain keywords/phrases due to the PR they had based on those links are hurting.

I have two sites that are not listed in dmoz or yahoo. They are both going to do great on this update.

Not sure if there is a connection, but if Google is devaluing those two directories, I won't cry any tears. I have two good sites that cant' make it into dmoz because of the editors, and I dont' want to pay yahoo their fee.

If Google is going to rebuild without counting those two directories, then I would have to say...YAHOOOOOOOO! Or I guess it would have to be GOOOOOOOGLE!

swones

1:47 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Who knows! Right now I don't think anybody except Google have a clue what's really happening. I'm just sitting here with my fingers/toes/leg/arms etc crossed hoping that it will all come back together before it hits www. If it does hit www like it is then like another poster said it's hard when your google traffic makes up a large part of what you use to put food on the table!

Simon.

europeforvisitors

1:50 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)



It seems to suck pretty uniformly for just about everyone posting on this forum...

I've dropped from #1 to #5 for my top keyphrase and from #4 to #8 for another. But I'm still #1 for many of my other most important keyphrases (especially the ones that have a direct impact on revenue), and in general I seem to be doing about the same as I did last month and the month before. I'll have a better picture of whether the update sucks (or doesn't) when things have settled down and I can see what effect, if any, the changes have had on my traffic and revenues.

In general, I see much less change from month to month than many of you do. Why? My guesses:

1) I have a content site with some 3,500 "evergreen" editorial pages, and most traffic arrives on inside pages--which means that significant changes in rank for a dozen, two dozen, or three dozen keyphrases won't have much impact on my overall referrals and traffic.

2) I practice only the most elementary forms of SEO: i.e., using descriptive anchor text and page titles, and linking to my most important pages from the home page and navigation bar. Because I don't know enough about SEO to try anything fancy, my search rankings are determined more by overall PageRank and page content than by what's being favored or punished in Google's algorithm du jour.

Bottom line: I'm not completely happy with what I see on www-sj or www3, but I'm not terribly unhappy, either--although I would prefer to continue ranking #1 for the main keyphrase that brings users to my home page. :-)

[edited by: europeforvisitors at 3:04 pm (utc) on May 6, 2003]

ncsuk

1:51 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



It is definatly not an old data set because my new site of 3-4 weeks has all the pages indexed in it so it is definatly a very recent fresh database.

Why exactly the results are all over the place is a different story.

I did notice however that 4 other sites I have done recently from new are not indexed. The difference? The ones that are indexed have a link and the ones that are not do not. This by no way means Google hasnt visited because I know for a fact that he has so whats up exactly?

IMHO I would probably say that these updated results are pure results and have no filtering on them except perhaps for banned sites...

Can anyone here confirm this for me?

I would also suggest that these results are likely to be combined with the old results to form some kind of medium. I may be way off the mark but I cannot see any other use for them except that Google is testing some new spider patterns and algo's and therefore the fact there are now 2 servers playing up could be a reason for this as they are testing it on 2 servers to see what happens.

This is by no means the latest update for this month so what is it...! We can keep sitting here and asking this question all day but I think it would be better if we collated some facts together and then see what we come up with..!

Everyone want to do this or shall we keep speculating and getting frustrated?

trillianjedi

1:56 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



It is definatly not an old data set because my new site of 3-4 weeks has all the pages indexed in it so it is definatly a very recent fresh database.

It looks to me like an old dataset with freshbot listings, not the April deepcrawl.

But others see the results of the April deepcrawl in there.

So it's some kind of combination of the two, or just not yet fully integrated with the April deepcrawl.

TJ

ncsuk

1:57 pm on May 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Yup I agree totally. Question is why are the rankings as screwed up as they are?
This 306 message thread spans 11 pages: 306