Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Jagger - Part 2

         

Brett_Tabke

1:08 am on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Continued from
[webmasterworld.com...]

Dayo_UK

9:14 pm on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)



>> but it's nice to see that Google can maybe sort out what pages are most important within a single site.

Which is the root of the Canonical url problem :)

soapystar

9:18 pm on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



woweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.......im number one for everything i search for......gooooooo google you rock.........yeah....your da Man googleguy!...GG your the best.......number 1 with a bullet for LARGE GREEN SMALL BLUE WIDGETS WITH GREEN SPOTS! been targetting that for a year now im at number one....i am the SEO of the year!

Dayo_UK

9:19 pm on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)



soapystar

Where? Which Dcs?

minicoopers

9:21 pm on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)



>> but it's nice to see that Google can maybe sort out what pages are most important within a single site.

Which is the root of the Canonical url problem :)

===

Can it? Google can do that? If Google can do that, I would suggest that Google did. Do that, I mean...

Google isn't doing that. Google isn't doing that at all.

Maybe Google will do that, one day...

But not yet - I see that Google isn't doing it yet...

fatpeter

9:43 pm on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



think soapystars got his tongue firmly lodged in his cheek lol

Patrick Taylor

9:45 pm on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Could someone please clarify exactly what signifies Google having corrected the canonical URL problem? I understand the basic issue of not wanting both www and non-www URLs to be indexed, but are we expecting a search for 'site:domain.com -www' to return no results when the fix is in place? (or vice versa)

macdave

9:46 pm on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



But not yet - I see that Google isn't doing it yet

Hence the "maybe" qualifier. It's definitely not all the way there yet, but we're seeing small steps in the right direction.

Powdork

9:47 pm on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



On 66.102.11.99 (and similar) I have all regular listings. All the other result sets have the familiar old url listings.
Here is a quik take on my view.

Jagger 1- The index (or datacenters) had to be updated to allow for the large amount of new data.
Jagger 2- The new data is added in. (Thus the full listings are back.) These pages have no power at this point so they won't show in results.
Jagger 3- The algorythm (or a new one) is then reapplied to the index without the power of the links from supplemental pages, and with the power of the 'released from canonical issues' pages.

reseller

9:49 pm on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



soapystar

>>i am the SEO of the year!<<

And you are hereby declared the SEO of the year 2005 :-)

Ok. Now you tell us where do you see those results?

cristinita

9:52 pm on Nov 4, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



this the 3rd time...no-one pays attention...but huge changes in 66.102.11.99 are happening as of now...and not only in the allinanchor command...now it's spreading to the regular searches...
This 1222 message thread spans 123 pages: 1222