Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 22.214.171.124
I am finding it really hard to bite my tongue at the moment.
When you see what has happened to Matts Blog and you have had the same thing happen to your site - and Google dont really discuss it - it is very depressing.
Homepage Canonical Problems are rife - I am 95% sure that is your problem Tigger.
But I know MC and GG are good guys and are probably sick and tired of hearing it and I am sick and tired of waiting for them to fix.
Soooooo. Sigh - time to move on from this update.
12 sites, only one is out of fan club.
large sites UP UP UP.
4 sites in english, out of fan club is the only one is on a shared ip in a US hosting.
The others are in portuguese, diferent rules, few competitors, less visitors but many #1 and #2 for main keywords.Even one i change hosting from US to European hosting on 27 Set have several #1 for main keywords. Any of them lose many visitors in jagger, one day or two.
Come on Google, is it so hard to detect and filter these kind of things?
I'm not complaining about our own rankings though. Some went up, some went down.
joined:June 11, 2005
lol ... Good point about NCFC, but I still think they're a little bit more relevant than our local Railway company, I might call them up and see if I can rent their front page from them ... probably be really late in getting back to me ;-)
joined:June 11, 2005
I hope the update was great for everyone else.
>>No fed up Reseller with it all.<<
C'mon. You have been so kind and helpfull to so many fellow webmasters including reseller ;-)
You send that reinclusion request and mention Dayo_UK at the begining. GG or Matt for sure shall help. You have nothing to lose and everything to win.
Listen Google! My good Norwich friend Dayo_UK is filing today a reinclusion request. You take good care of Dayo_UK request as good as he is taking care of so many WebmasterWorld webmasters, or else. Thanks a bunch :-)
They know what the problem is about. It wont make any difference whatsoever.
I posted on MC blog - it was deleted - he is obviously sick of hearing about it. Perhaps it is not of concern - I dont know, but I cant go around chasing my tail forever.
Trying to help people does not normally come back on oneself :).
Do a search for the phrase 'website promotion company' in Google.co.uk, select pages from the UK only and that retail giant that all us Brits will be familiar with pops up in the SERPS at numero 7 (Tesco.com!). Not sure how selling groceries is related to website promotion!
Google Guy - is this spam or is your algorithm broken? It really concerns me to see such unrelated results in Google's SERPS! Not good for your brand either!
also, does anyone here know why, for one keyword, I am #78, yet using allinanchor, i am #8? why would there such a large gap?
Curently I am at no. 25 on 126.96.36.199, but on 188.8.131.52 I am down at no. 36.
Still pretty crap being as I was no. 6 until 17th October, then dropped to no. 320!
I have a good content site with over 200 hand written pages, nothing to really spam the system apart from the basic SEO stuff, yet no. 1 on my keywords is a site with ony 3 pages and two of those are full of links!
I am just trying to run a business, that's all.
These threads are growing faster than I can read :s
It will be interesting to see the aftermath of Jagger and find out if it has got rid of spammers or/and created a better search facility. Anybody thinking that this might be a test for Google's own 'Mindset'?
About jagger3 - Im not even sure it has started and if there is a fix done to non www issue, it will come at once not over days, but once again dont expect it.
It talks about the Jagger updates.
Does this make sense to anyone?
How do you “extract your site from link farms and other low quality sites”?
There is a lot more in this article.
As for the "other" category, your site's overall health can quickly be determined by the sheer volume of low-quality links connecting to your site. For example, if you audit 1,000 links into your site and 700 of the links are from internal, paid, solicited, or relational links, it's pretty safe to say the latest algorithmic updates aren't the reason your site lost positioning.
However, if the "other" category accounts for over 70 percent of the links into your site, you probably had some link extraction work to do if you want to keep your search results robust. And it's relatively important to extract your site from link farms and other poor quality sites while you build credible links into your site.
They could careless if I want to be in their sites. I would not even think about wasting my time asking them to remove me. No way this is hurting my rankings unless I mistakenly link back to one of them.
I had a look at this and checked the page out, of course it ranks number 7, it has the words "10% off promotion" - priceless.
Im seeing to much of these junk results.
Day off needed.
joined:June 13, 2005
joined:June 13, 2005
Just apply as it says on the box .. erase old index new problem sorted.
But what do I find on a search term we rank 1st. Some age old page in supplemental ranks first then the actual page. Yes they are the same as I just changed the directory structure to something that looked nicer to the human eye. Before google ranked the actual page 1st after J3 it's the other way around .. This is not an improvement lol.
No comment really .. 4/5 traffic loss .. I even made a server just 301ing example.com www.example.com since J1 and J2 passed with no effect I assume I am penalised for some 301 or so.. if J3 was canonical .. and canonical means this 301 issue.
httpd codes make sense ... use them G...