Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

September 2002 Google Update

It's Official

         

nell

11:37 am on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



7:15 est I see different results on WWW, WW2, and WW3 in Florida

Beachboy

9:41 pm on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Akan:

Figure a week before things settle down and become consistent.

dan_popescu

9:43 pm on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Mine's already in www. Unfortunately with the same terrible ranks.

pmac

9:45 pm on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



www2 and 3 will take several days to make the switch over to the main db.
Lots of useful info here about the google dance.
[webmasterworld.com...]

Beachboy

9:45 pm on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Patience. www is going to show new results, then old results, then new then old and it's gonna go on like that for a week. Look, take a handful of tranks with a few beers and go watch I Love Lucy reruns. ;) If your positioning is really gonna suck on www, then you have a week (more or less) in which sometimes you will still have decent positioning.

AkanDian rain

9:57 pm on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



If I change the site within this next week will the changes get indexed? Or am I stuck with what they have till next month?

deejay

10:01 pm on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



AkanDian rain

I'd suggest if you have any changes to make you get them done very quickly. The googlebot often spiders around/immediately after the dance.

If Ms G. shows up at your site tomorrow and you don't make your changes until the day after, you may have to wait TWO months to get them in.

<clarification> The update that is happening now is based on spidering for the last month. The spidering that is starting now will go towards next month's update. Miss this spidering and you wait until the update after that.

Unless, of course, you get really lucky and get caught up in the 'minty fresh' minor updates... but I wouldn't count on that. </clarification>

[edited by: deejay at 10:04 pm (utc) on Sep. 26, 2002]

dazz

10:01 pm on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Well i dont know what all the fuss is about to be honest...obviously alot of you have suddenly dropped in the rankings. Its very early and there is always quite big changes over about 3-4 days directly after the update. Every update brings lots of people been very happy or gutted...My site has increased slightly on the rankings, no major changes and im quite happy with it at the moment. To talk about major algo changes is abit over the top. For nearly every keyword I have pretty much every site thats competition to mine in roughly the same place and my site has increased slightly as ive managed to get some good themed links from some PR6 pages included in my backlinks.

As a few have been saying...there has not been much 'action' from the Mod's or "people with alot of posts" mainly because they have been there done that about 20 times before and you always get the same parinoia etc.

Lets just wait a few days till the update calms down before people start moaning about it!

vmcknight

10:22 pm on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Well, I hope to goodness this isn't finished! This month I converted most of the format to CSS, added some pages of content, and added keywords to the title tag - and just dropped five places. Gasp! But it's not over yet...

4crests

10:23 pm on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I have been #1 for my best keyword for quite a while, so i guess i can't complain too much. My best listing dropped to #3 in www2 and www3. I guess i will just sit back and hope it doesn't stick.

As far as i can tell, the only thing the two sites that moved above me have better than my site is LOTS of outbound links. I have avoided outbound links as much as possible from my main page, but after seeing this update, maybe it doesn't matter as much as i thought. (or, maybe it's helping them somehow). Is there a positive effect to linking to another high PR site?

I never have quite understood all the PR stuff. I have always just tried to get lots of inbound high ranking PR sites. Should i also have a ton of outbound links?

If anyone can explain, please sticky mail me. Thanks.

ikbenhet1

10:39 pm on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



4crest,

my best ranking page has no more then 15 links on it, and is linking to 4 high pr'd sites.
so the answer is no

Paully

10:43 pm on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0)



Looks like the results have started moving from www2 to www. In Southern California.

HackingLawyer

10:52 pm on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



How do you check the PR on www2. By changing google to www2 and typing in webpagename.com the backward links can be determined, and keywords can be searched but is there anyway to check for changes in pagerank?

skibum

11:14 pm on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Looks like a massive algo change at least on some terms if these results stick. Went from #3 (been top-10 for years) to #55 and most of the other players for those keywords seem to have fallen off the map as well. No site changes since last month. :(

Jane_Doe

11:37 pm on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



> To talk about major algo changes is abit over the top.

I see totally different results for some keywords, especially significant changes in the SERPs for some health terms. It looks to me like Pagerank and DMOZ listings may have heavier weighting this time around. For a number of health related keywords, many of the schlocky little sites promising instant cures for anything and everything are gone, and have been replaced with higher PR sites. Sites that had held #1 spot for months for certain terms that I track are now not even in the top twenty returns.

bobmark

11:44 pm on Sep 26, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I lost only on 1 keyword, but I dropped off the map on it and it was important. Lets say as my HYPOTHETICAL example I was #5 for:
"Canada Husky Dog"
and the name of my site was "Canada Husky Dog Tours"
Now I am off the map for "canada husky dog" but way up for "canada husky canine" and unchanged for my site name "canada husky Dog tours".
There are two possible explanations:
1) the new algo redefines spam. Previously my 14 occurrences of "dog" and 3 occurrence of Canada Husky Dog in the text of my home page were ok and helped my serp. Now they are too many and Google has - in essence - said "I am going to ignore your site for searches for "canada husky dog""
2) as suggested on here there is a problem - temporary or otherwise - with integrating sites that are crawled multiple times per week into the index at this point. Yesterday I was #5 with a freshness date of sep 24; now I am gone for that search term. The flaw with this analysis is why only the single search term?
My guess is it is a redefinition of the threshhold of repetition that is defined as spam.

dukeblue219

12:06 am on Sep 27, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I'm getting a massive amount of traffic to my "widget games" page even as the new database is being rolled out slowly in this update. It looks like TITLE tags have a huge weight today, as a number of people have pointed out.

In my title I've got a few of the specific products that these games can be run on, and searches for "wig-83 games," "wig-89 games," "wig-92 games," etc. are all sending in LOTS of traffic. Hopefully it stays like, this, but it seems WAY to easy to SPAM the algo like it is right now.

BTW In case you can't guess, this is a small calculator games section ;)

rfgdxm1

12:09 am on Sep 27, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



What I'm seeing so far at this point of the dance in terms of ranking relevence:

#1)Keyword in title. As important as before, if not more.
#2)Keyword in URL. DEFINITELY this is VERY important without multi-keyword domain names (e.g. keyword1-keyword2-keyword3.com). From what some have reported, multi-keyword domain still work.

Thus, based on the 2 above, if I wanted to do really well for "widgets", I'd register widgets.TLD (doesn't make a difference if it is a .ws, .cc, .fr, etc.) with a page title of "Widgets". The strategies above are working in SERPs I'm checking.

#3)PageRank. Nothing new here. If you wanna be #1 for "widgets", make sure you've got decent PR along with #1 and #2 above.

#4)Decent keyword density. Still important, but falling down a bit.

#5)Inbound anchor text in links seems definitely lower than before. Whereas before a link was heavily weighted "I'm voting for this (or these) words on this page", now a link is more "I'm voting for this page", and Google is letting the page decide what keywords are important to it, not the linking page. IMO not necessarily a bad change. Why should *other* sites determine what keywords are important to *my* page?

Of course, some of these may not yet be fully factored in at this stage of the dance. Definitely I'd say at the end of the dance check and see if anchor text hasn't gone up in importance.

bobmark

12:10 am on Sep 27, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



lol once again two totally opposite experiences one after the other. Back to the drawing board.

gopi

12:23 am on Sep 27, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Really totally different opinions...my observations make me believe that the title part is toned down , but more users are reporting that title is THE most important thing in this update

Confused ... :(

bobmark

12:31 am on Sep 27, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



me too gopi!
I thought i had figured out that it had defined my "keyword1, keyword2, keyword3 blah blah blah keyword 2, keyword 1, keyword3" TITLE as spam. Now I don't know what to think.

egomaniac

12:46 am on Sep 27, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



So far here is my working theory:

Some links count more/some count less than others.
-Could be certain types of external links count more,
-Could be internal links count less,
-Could be both.

I can find no pattern before/after update with regards to title text. In my industry it looks to count a bit less now. Also the some of the tops pages I am seeing have less topical relevance and keyword density than before. Which points back to an algo tweak in the linking as hypothesized above.

I don't think themes are an issue here. My themed sites have plummeted for the theme's topic phrases. Unless themes are being penalized, which would seem to be a really dumb thing to do.

rfgdxm1

12:48 am on Sep 27, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



One thing I just noticed from examining some of the SERPs I'm most familiar with. I'm convinced at this point that PageRank is NOT well factored in yet. Checking the SERPs from one of the keywords I am targeting with my sites (those curious can quickly spot this keyowrd from my profile with from the .org domain), I am seeing listed higher than one of my sites a couple pages that, while they have the keyword in the title and adequate density, have a measley PageRank of 2, and no inbound links from other sites I can find. As opposed to my main site (the non-.org) having a PageRank of 5, and everything else right on page.

If this holds, then the algo really is strange this time. However, in the past it has been my observation that the last thing to fully get factored in is PageRank. Last dance I was in the #1 spot for another keyword at the beginning, and got knocked down in the very end below another site with better PR than me.

Chico_Loco

12:53 am on Sep 27, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



How might I determine the new IP as its not all hit the WWW main server yet.

I still have my old PR of 3 but thats ok because the domain was inactive for month, expecting a 5 or so for an initial PR value, but how do I check on WWW2 and 3?

Thanks

Beachboy

12:58 am on Sep 27, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



RFG:

It is your experience that PR calculations come in to play at the END of the dance? That would mean "final" (insofar as anything is final at Google anymore) positions are established at the last moment. That is way different from saying that new PR numbers are finally revealed at the last moment of the dance. Is that correct? I am curious how you came to that conclusion.

steveb

1:03 am on Sep 27, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



regarding msg #:342

I completely agree that keyword in title and keyword in URL are more important now. This update has been excellent for content and very harsh on spam and meaninglessness (who really gives a hoot what the inbound link text is).

My principal concern is that title being so important can lead to some silly results... like there happens to be some site that (inexplicably) is named after my keyword but sells completely unrelated Hong Kong action film DVDs, and they get two listings in top ten of www2 and www3 now. I'm thinking those won't hold though since I see a major change in www (back to the old results) a few minutes ago, but (long winded)... my other point is, I'm thinking (based on some comments here too) that new sites are going to see artificially high first month or two rankings.

A nice improvement Google, you still aren't perfect (I'll go to my grave baffled by some page rank issues), but you get better all the time.

defanjos

1:11 am on Sep 27, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Do you want to know what I think?
I think Google purposely changes the algo radically once in a while to mislead all the SEOs out there.
Once you think you have it figured out...bam, they change it.

They change it, but somehow keep the good quality results.

They (Google people) probably have a good laugh by reading this thread every month.

egomaniac

1:15 am on Sep 27, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



rfgdxm1 what you are saying is making some sense to me.

I have 3 keyword phrases that are all moderatively competitive, and each turns up around 2,000,000 to 3,000,000 results. 1 of the three still ranks fine - #5. Of the other 2, I can find one at around #60 (used to be top 10 for 2 years), and the third I have yet to find (has been top 10/top20 for last few months). All three of these have extensive internal links with the respective keyword phrase. The one that is at #5 has no external links (internal links and PR only). The other two are domain/subdomain root pages and have a variety of external links.

Based on skimpy evidence so far, it would seem this update is very incomplete. If it is "complete" then I can't distinguish a pattern as to what the new results are all about. I know many people say wait, wait, give the update a few days. The past 4-6 mos.(my memory is foggy) it seems that almost as soon as the update started it was done. And in the past what I've seen for my results at the beginning of the update has been what I saw when it rolled out.

PS - Please don't make "woo-hoo I'm #1" or "boo-hoo my site is gone" posts unless you can contribute some insight into the update. WebmasterWorld is getting huge, and this thread is getting hard to read for real analysis.

egomaniac

1:18 am on Sep 27, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Helpmebe1,

You are wasting your time for this update. Anything you do now will not show up until either the end of October or the end of November (depends when GGB comes by your site). Get some sleep.

teeceo

1:20 am on Sep 27, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



My sites links or showing in www3 and www2 but not www, is this part of the dance or am I updated intil next time?

teeceo.

rfgdxm1

1:21 am on Sep 27, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>It is your experience that PR calculations come in to play at the END of the dance? That would mean "final" (insofar as anything is final at Google anymore) positions are established at the last moment. That is way different from saying that new PR numbers are finally revealed at the last moment of the dance. Is that correct? I am curious how you came to that conclusion.

This happened to me last month. Last month, on one keyword early in the dance I shot up to #1. Over the site I have been playing second banana to at Google on this keyword for half a year. Both out sites have everything right on page. Keyword in title, and decent density for this keyword. However, this other site has a PR of 6 on this page to my PR of 5. At the very end of the dance, they moved ahead of me.

Of course, nothing changed on our pages between the beginning and end of the dance. The only thing that I can see reasonably explaining this is they stomped me with their superior PR. Which makes sense the way PR is supposed to work. If you've got better PR than all the competing sites, and your page is well optimized for the keyword in question, shouldn't your site come out on top? The way I have it figured, unless the algo changes, I'm *always* gonna play second fiddle to this other site unless I can somehow get the inbound links to beat them in the PR game. I assure you this wouldn't be easy unless some PR7 page is nice enough to link to my main site's index.htm page. ;)

To your question at the end: yep, I'm convinced PR doesn't fully kick in until the end.

This 452 message thread spans 16 pages: 452