Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

www2 www3 and -in offline

         

SEOPTI

9:14 pm on Dec 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Can't get it loaded from Europe.

ulysee

12:55 am on Dec 22, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



For my search, -in has just propogated its results to
-ex, -cw, and -fi.
Sigh of relief.

I don't see any movement in serps but I did see your post in the other forum.........

shaadi

7:46 am on Dec 22, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I am very happy with it. I have seen a lot of hard work paying off. ogletree

Same with me :)

Crush

10:01 am on Dec 22, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I am very happy with it. I have seen a lot of hard work paying off. ogletree

what you been doing?

seofreak

11:52 am on Dec 22, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



haha nice try ;)

Crush

12:04 pm on Dec 22, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I am sure ogletree is not in competition with me. Hey ogletree?

ogletree

2:11 pm on Dec 22, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Well I can't give away all my secrets. It's funny I got one thing fixed and now something else is broken. I am still happy with the new SERPS just wish I had everything I wanted.

lasko

3:33 pm on Dec 22, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member




Its very tempting to make changes to my site, but its difficult to understand what to change since Google is so erratic and illogical.

Sites that have vanished for no particular reason that are small but rich in content like 100 page web sites related to a particular theme, providing unique content, good links to imformative sites and sticking to the rules of Google.

Sites that have 30,000 pages with only 2 pages of related content out perform those nice semi-pro 100 related page sites.

SERP's providing links to the Google, Dmoz and Yahoo directories instead of providing relative web sites. Those directory listings are then showing links to the same sites that have been dropped :)

www2, www3 and www-in show different results, no change in backlinks and no PR in the toolbar. Plus GG says "We are having fun" with these servers?

I have counted 3 major shifts in results since 16th November plus the usual fresh bot listings every two days.

So why should I change my pages now with all this erractic behavior?

All the local companies in our region have been knocked out and replaced my major sites from the BBC, Manchesteronline, Trip advisor etc with hardly anything related to our region.

Usually, if I lost my rankings by a page or so I would be very worried, however seen as our site has now been bombed like all the other competitors in the region theirs nothing to worry about. In our region we now have no good companies providing a great travel resource or travel service due to this update.

Does seem apparent that big keyword searches for hotel accommodation, apartments or other top level keywords are fine however as soon as a destination is placed after the keywords things begin to look a bit messy in certain areas.

Not a lot I can do nor will do seen as their nothing I can see I did wrong. One site has been knocked down but still appears occasionally has 4 domains linking to each other and a very highly optimized index page more so then other web sites. No OOP has been applied and their keyword density is the highest amoungst our competitors. Site has plenty of links out and in as part of a link exchange program.

Some sites with hidden text are still managing to get through and sites with no hidden text and plenty of readable content have been punished.

Keep hanging on to hope :) (running out soon)

yankee

3:48 pm on Dec 22, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



"All the local companies in our region have been knocked out and replaced my major sites from the BBC, Manchesteronline, Trip advisor etc with hardly anything related to our region."

This is the major problem with Google's new algorithm.

lasko

4:23 pm on Dec 22, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member




Another important factor is that some of the best web sites do have SEO performed in their pages and Google runs the risk of poor search results just because they dislike SEO.

I admire the work of Google their performance, ideas and innovative ideas however they are punishing sites that seemed to be over optimized either because of SEO or by mistake of the site creator.

Some webmasters dont perform any SEO or think about SEO but have made the mistake of putting just one too many keywords in his/her page. Google punishes this page because of SEO and its dislike of SEO.

I would much prefer Google spend every working hour looking at ways of ridding the hidden text and Spamlinking techniques and try improving the indexing of dynamic pages then looking at ways to punish good sites for a little over optimization.

If a web page is overoptimized then it should rank slightly less maybe by 1 page to give the site the benefit of the doubt not lay down the rules and bomb it from exsistance and deprive the user the chance of finding this site that might actually be what they are looking for.

Google's hate of SEO could lead them to ruining their own success.

I think Google will have to be careful laying out the penalties like this, they should just knock points off not ban.

Anyway its now snowing heavy here in Prague so it looks like we will have a white christams. :)

All the best everyone!

Eljaybe

4:17 pm on Dec 22, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I was wondering if anyone noticed a recent change in their position on Google for certain keywords? A certain 2-word keyword phrase that I dropped from page 1 to 33 as a result of the original Florida update now is no where to be found for this kw phrase. There are still sites listed for this kw phrase that are clearly irrelevant, but my site (which is highly relevant) is completely gone?
Is is possible Google first penalized me and now banned me for this kw phrase? I'm thinking about calling Adwords to see if I can get an answer (since I spend thousands on Adwords every month- you'd think they would help me on this?).
I still hold good positions for other less important kw phrases, so I don't think Google banned my site. I just don't see why they would drop me to page 33, and now completely drop me out of the SERPs?

algarveb

4:32 pm on Dec 22, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



For our top KW, www-1 has just changed to show different results from www-2 & www-3.

The number of results showing has also dropped from around 100k to 24k.

Is anyone else seeing alnything like this?

nileshkurhade

5:00 pm on Dec 22, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



For our top KW, www-1 has just changed to show different results from www-2 & www-3.
The number of results showing has also dropped from around 100k to 24k.

Is anyone else seeing alnything like this?

I dont know if i should say this but i have been seeing different results for last 24 hours. Some times i see results from www2 on www and sometimes same as old results. I have never seen such behaviour previously so I am a bit worried about posting this reply.

Hissingsid

5:34 pm on Dec 22, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



There are still sites listed for this kw phrase that are clearly irrelevant, but my site (which is highly relevant) is completely gone?

Hi Eljaybe,

Same thing here. I was completely dropped mid November came back in at #45 now that small glimer of hope has been snuffed out as on -in and other DCs that -in has propogated to, I'm down at #540.

Even though I think that I now understand what has happened to the algo to cause this change I find it very difficult to accept that a search term which is very specific and used almost exclusively in the UK and Australia is being interpreted as its more general US term and then stemmed, synonymed and generally bas***dised by a US English centric guessing machine.

Ho! Ho! Ho! tis the season of good cheer!

Best wishes

Sid

nolen1

6:46 pm on Dec 22, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



"There are still sites listed for this kw phrase that are clearly irrelevant, but my site (which is highly relevant) is completely gone?"

Same thing here too. A lot of the irrelevant sites have links pointing to them from .edu and .gov domains.

world3d

7:01 pm on Dec 22, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Just my two cents to add to the data...

For my two-word keyword phrase I was #1 pre-Florida... GONE with Florida, then back to about #13 about a week ago and #2 with the new
-in which by the way is STILL alone with it's results here in California.

I have a highly optimized site but no spam/cheating. I feel sure that I was subjected to an OOP that has now been dialed way back but not eliminated.

Kwix

9:01 pm on Dec 22, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



While everybody is dropping pennies on the ground I might as well chuck my $.02 in as well. Prior to Florida (Nov 15ish) my primary site ranked very well (6th or so) for KW1 KW2 and number 3 for KW3 KW4. Immediately post Florida we were dropped down to around 30ith for both keyword sets. The the algo tweek about 2 weeks ago brought us back to 6-8 for KW1 KW2 and 1st for KW3 KW4.

NOW this "update" has us on the second page for both. Not so bad as the immediate Florida results, but enough to cause a blow to my ego.

chinook

11:46 pm on Dec 22, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Earlier in this thread, GG asked people to submit their views on -in (which now appears to have migrated to www). We input our thoughts on it and today received a personalized email back from Google, thanking us for our suggestions and promising to pass them along to the appropriate team.

I am quite encouraged by this kind of positive response and certainly feel the serps have improved over the weekend.

OT Finally 63-tks

superscript

12:22 am on Dec 23, 2003 (gmt 0)



I'm pretty slap happy with the new SERPs - back at Number One with a two keyword phrase :)

WooHoo!

The new SERPs are excellent; I'm thrilled. Stop whingeing everyone!

Unfortunately, I'm at No 1 on the only non-commercial combination of my keywords available. That is, the two keywords no-one will ever type in :(

WooHoo?

Niet, Non, No! - it's no cause for celebration. Because if I'm number one on a non-commerce phrase, then I'm clearly not being penalised, and my high PR still counts - as long as the search term isn't too commercial.

textex

12:39 am on Dec 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I don't get it. I am seeing a shift in results...but it does not look like the current -in index. What am I missing?

Crisco

1:41 am on Dec 23, 2003 (gmt 0)



Well I can't give away all my secrets.

LORD- you dont have any secrets and if you actually did it would benefit you to share with your fellow colleagues so that your ideas can be developed and further refined.

Progress is seldom made when true facts are hidden - furthermore its been my experience that more often than not when individuals state "my secrets" they often have no knowledge at all!

Sorry - tired of seeing foobs run around as if they knew everything - hell If I knew everything E.G. had secrets I wouldnt be here posting that I had secrets!

bluemi

2:37 am on Dec 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Bit late, I didn't see lasko's post before, but here a few thoughts anyway.

I'm beginning to wonder how much all of us - including me - over the last two years or so have totally overestimated what is called Google's spam filters. With every little change in algorithm or index update thousands of webmasters are asking themselves, what have I done wrong, why has Google penalized my site, etc. etc. Fact is:

- The percentage of spam sites and sites using "forbidden" techniques has increased in Google's index over the last two years, not only since the Florida update
- The majority of those sites that got penalized haven't done anything wrong

I had a "test site" going for several months now. It has PR4 and I have tried virtually every spam technique on this site that I could imagine: linking to penalized sites, using invisible texts and links, cloaking, etc.
Result: the site never ever has been penalized, its PR lowered or whatever.

In my opinion all this talk about spam filters is just something created by Google itself to give people the impression of Google being on the forefront of technological developments. What in fact really happens is that every now and then there is a RANDOM change in Google's algorithm, without any sense, and with each update a certain percentage of websites is RANDOMLY dropped from the index. The result is the desired one anyway: Google looks like being "dynamic" and stays in the discussions, and thousands of webmasters are becoming even more careful about doing "forbidden" things on their sites. However, thousands of other webmasters have also realized that the spam filters are non-existent and keep stuffing the index with their crap.

Overall, Google used to be a good search engine - it isn't anymore. I say this from the standpoint of a search engine user, not a webmaster. None of my sites ever got penalized, so no reason for me to be mad at Google. It's just that the overall quality of the search results is a lot worse than it used to be. For me there are better search engines around (again)...

nileshkurhade

3:26 am on Dec 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



superscript
I'm pretty slap happy with the new SERPs - back at Number One with a two keyword phrase :)

New SERPs, I dont see any new SERPs not even in the datacenters except www-in. Has there been any change.

dazzlindonna

3:43 am on Dec 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



nileshkurhade,

-in has propogated to all the other datacenters either for SOME PEOPLE, or for SOME SEARCHES. i'm not sure how this is working, but basically, some people see the propogation and some don't. Whether or not that has to do with who is looking or with what they are looking at, i'm not sure. In any case, -in is propogating (has already propogated for some), so I would assume everyone will see the changes eventually.

shaadi

6:05 am on Dec 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The one thing that is sure -> www-in is showing up at www.

Rest all is pretty unsure, I see everything changed now *again*. G some stablity is needed.

Jakpot

10:05 am on Dec 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



- The percentage of spam sites and sites using "forbidden" techniques has increased in Google's index over the last two years, not only since the Florida update
- The majority of those sites that got penalized haven't done anything wrong

For the keywords I monitor I agree with your first point.

I also agree with point two. I have very simple webpages that at one time were ranked consistently in the top ten.
They had no forbidden techniques included cause I'm not smart enough to use them anyway.
These pages had no changes
made to them over the last year but were banished to the Google graveyard for some(?) reason.
Over the past year Google related traffic to these pages has decreased over 90%. I keep daily traffic records and am sickened when I compare traffic one year ago to now.
What is Google?

FillDeCube

10:20 am on Dec 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Is filter has been added to results in www? I can see many sub-domain spam in the results.

netnerd

10:49 am on Dec 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Im in the uk here and -in is NOT on www for me at the moment - though i realise maybe its going to random datacentres.

MyWifeSays

12:52 pm on Dec 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I too am in the UK and a page of mine is no. 3 in -in but not in the first 1000 in www for a popular commercial search term. I'm seeing no traffic for the page so I guess nobody in the UK is seeing -in.

nileshkurhade

2:01 pm on Dec 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Any reasons why i see www-in results in www sometimes and sometimes the same old results. When I do a search on other datacenters I get the old results. I have never experienced such behaviour before. My search one hour before showed me results from www-in and a search just a minute ago showed the old results.

claus

3:13 pm on Dec 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



<ot, sorry>bluemi, imho that post of yours deserves a thread of it's own, eg. "the myth of spam filtering" or so - it's true it's been seemingly non-existing for a while. Then again there are so many kinds of possible spam and no clear definition, so just saying "spam" is a bit like saying "weather".</ot, sorry>
This 153 message thread spans 6 pages: 153