Forum Moderators: open
[edited by: Macguru at 1:12 pm (utc) on May 13, 2003]
Give us the serp's...
Nightmare....
<added>and on AOL and netscape now</added>
Craig
[edited by: creative_craig at 1:41 pm (utc) on May 13, 2003]
Looks like SJ on AOL to me though.
Looks normal on Yahoo
(He plods off miserably to make himself a coffee)
Why can't Google simply use some new data?
Are Yahoo and AOL affected by DNS round-robin? it looks like ...
Dan
Craig
It's only a mess in your opinion! Remember if your sites go down, somebody elses goes up!
Why in the world would AOL and Y! show such results when G is not?
-fi and -sj make no sense to me. What in the world makes one think these are better results. Someone please tell me, cause in all my years, I have never seen such a poor index.
Craig
due to hitting the wrong key on the weekend before the April deep crawl I lost about 500 of my most popular pages. I couldn't restore them until the following weekend. So I am very pleased with -sj/-fi since they include those pages when a traditional update wouldn't.
I wonder if all the people who dont like the -sj / -fi index have actually searched it for anything other than their own 'keywords'?
Anyways these pages have got PR according to the sj index so I'm sitting fairly pretty at the mo!
I think those that don't that have genuine non-spammy sites will do ok, it's just not fully up to date yet.
Although having said that, it must be close. fi and sj showing 617,000 yahoo backlinks now. It's increasing all the time.
The new index must be very nearly cooked and ready to dance!
TJ
And to the chap who mentioned other people go up when we we go down.....your damn right SPAM sites do really well in this new list....Inktomi here I come.....
Forget Bretts successful way to get into Google within a year all that means jack as far as these results show....
You playing a dangerous game Google as most people on here who are pissed off are decent site producers following the rules....I for one will make sure I don't from now on....
Sometimes I think there needs to be a separate search for sites that are primarily information.
(edit after reading critter's message) If all those factors haven't been added why ever would they let it go public even with other services?
[edited by: annej at 2:37 pm (utc) on May 13, 2003]
1/ Most likely the last deep crawl (April) data is not in the new index yet;
2/ Most likely spam filters are not on the new index yet;
3/ Most likely all the backlinks are not on the new index yet;
You'll notice that we only have -sj and -fi that have the "new" results--*all* the datacenters will probably have these same results before new data/filters/etc are "danced" to the indecies.
I hate to supplant GG here but: "Don't Panic!"
Peter
I've heard so many people say dont panic over the last few days....personally I don't see things changing much....these will be the final result....
[edited by: webdev at 2:36 pm (utc) on May 13, 2003]
