Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Sandboxed Sites - Back Together?

Do they come out together or one by one?

         

McMohan

10:09 am on Nov 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Most of the new sites that I work with are still in the sandbox. Was just curios to know, if all the sanboxed sites come out of the sandbox during one fine major updation or one by one, over the rolling updates?

That is to say, should one be checking to see if the sites are out of the sandbox regularly or only when they know there is a major Google update? :)

Thanks

Mc

jrzero

4:23 pm on Nov 29, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



"For some reason everyone assumes that MSN is better, I'm sorry I just don't see that. Do a search on "money." Not sure that Eddie Money should be up so high at number 12... Of course MSN Money is #1"

Go to google and search on
Toolbar
Alerts
news
free email

Their products list number one.

jrzero

4:34 pm on Nov 29, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



continuation of previous post..
Some of the google searches do list them as sponser links.

I just searched msn and beta.search.msn

beta - Top two results the same as google: 1-cnn,2-moneycentral... MS Money was number 5, not number 1

search.msn - 1-cnn, 2-msn money.. Ms Money was number 5 here too.

Neither ms site pushed a sponsered link at the top for ms money.

mark1615

5:42 pm on Nov 29, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Rod, I would like to know how competitive your terms are?

(And congratulations.)

brixton

5:54 pm on Nov 29, 2004 (gmt 0)



MHes
msg #:305>the best message until now.-
and by the way all those barking here about evil google what do thay expect? that the top established pages that are for years at the top with hard work to go down? so there new spam or not or whatever pages comes up? if that's the case well done "sundbox"

creepychris

6:26 pm on Nov 29, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Wow. I only manage a few select content sites, all of which are very old. But for the first time in a long time I launched a new site three weeks ago. I launched it prematurely, thinking I would have to wait in the sandbox for 6 months. But I started getting my first referrals from Google yesterday. I checked and they were on page two of the SERPS.

I submitted the site to Google three weeks ago but Gbot didn't show. Then about 10 days ago I gave an index page link from a PR6 site that Gbot visits at least daily. Within 24 hours, GBot dropped by the new site and took the index page of the new site. The same thing happened for three days straight. Then on the fourth day, Gbot took everything (spidered deeply).

The new site is in the google cache with a nice site description.
The new site site has only 3 external backlinks (all PR6).
The new site offered fresh content every time Gbot visited.
The new site was on a new domain, that I think was never used before (or atleast hadn't been for a long time as I couldn't find any traces of it being used in the past).

Does it appear that I am out of the sandbox?

phantombookman

7:27 pm on Nov 29, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hi Mark
they vary depending on how vague or precise the search term is but my searches tend to range from 6.5 million matches to about 200,000

It is easy to see in my area how sites and pages should rank as there is very little seo. Consequently the sandbox is glaringly obvious.
Regards
Rod

hdpt00

9:29 pm on Nov 29, 2004 (gmt 0)



creepychris: if the domain was old and purchased a while back it seems the sandbox does not effect it. This could be why you had success.

Powdork

7:25 am on Nov 30, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



creepychris,
Also, sites sometimes enjoy a bit of time (1-3 weeks) in the sun before disappearing. Let us know how it goes.

andsieg888

11:17 am on Nov 30, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I'm curious if anyone has had any success with buying a domian which has been registered for over a year but has a PR of 0 and then tried to build a site which ranks well....essientially avoiding the sandbox.

Or, as many have suggested, are recently created backlinks what are really being sandboxed, regardless of the age of the site?

brixton

11:29 am on Nov 30, 2004 (gmt 0)



""buying a domian "" do you mean Damian Del boy's son?:-)

brixton

11:35 am on Nov 30, 2004 (gmt 0)



andsieg888,sory for the humor ,just to relax a bit from stress,anyway there are some huge updates today in SERPS ,check for your selfs..very very interesting!

Pimpernel

12:20 pm on Nov 30, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Huh? Cannot see any major changes at all. A few positions moved slightly but nothing beyond the ordinary

andsieg888

1:33 pm on Nov 30, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



brixton, it's all good.

not seeing much change in the serps in my neck of the woods.

profitpuppy

4:14 am on Dec 1, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hi, I read about 75% of this thread and I just as confused as when I started...

There is a sandbox... there isn't. You shouldn't try and optimise... of course you should... new pages work on old sites but buying old sites doesn't work all the time... and so and so forth...

In summary, (and taking into account that there will always be an exception to the rule/s) what overall recommendations are there (apart from sitting back and doing nothing).

Also, has this topic received any non industry specific mainstream press that you know of?

cbpayne

4:27 am on Dec 1, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>apart from sitting back and doing nothing

I have tried everything to get out of sandbox, so sitting back and doing nothing is a good option.

This 472 message thread spans 32 pages: 472