Forum Moderators: martinibuster
For example, a click on an ad for digital cameras on a web page about photography tips may be worth less than a click on the same ad appearing next to a review of digital cameras.
[edited by: markus007 at 8:08 pm (utc) on April 1, 2004]
Whoa there. Read what you said. If you were to teach an advertiser to convert well off of content do you think they would do it? They sure would. Why is it so unrealistic to expect advertisers to learn how to market with a different medium?
That may happen eventually, but right now, I wonder how many advertisers would want to venture into waters that are muddied by so many different types of "content" (some of questionable value).
Drop in EPC for the whole month of March is about 20%. Traffic is normal, and CTR is very slightly up 0.1%. Revenue is also down April to date 21% from March.
All these sites are very different in scope. There seems to be no pattern to the drop (i.e. lowest traffic sites didn't drop the most, etc.).
CTR down 20%
EPC down 48%
CPM down 58%
I get this CPM from the stinking NON TARGETED BANNER AD COMPANIES!
Oh, and you know why I think this is the case? About 75% of the ads shown are OFF TOPIC!
I just looked into the channel stats and it looks like this:
- CPC before: $1 to $2 => now 85% less
- CPC before: $0.5 => now 60% less
- CPC before: $0.10 ... $0.20 => now 35% less
I can see this kind of pattern on a medium traffic (high converting) and on a high traffic site (low converting), 500k impressions/day sample. I haven't seen any improvement in ad-targeting yet.
so it appears as if the "high earners" were hit the hardest... on the other side if you were in the $0.10 to $0.20 range before you might actually seen a small increase in earnings by better/different targeting. (a couple of months ago all in a sudden all our ads changed to a different topic which resulted in a 40% higher CTR/income)