Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Saga. Part 5

         

Brett_Tabke

8:26 pm on Nov 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



What say you?

Over and done with?

All done all through?

wheelie34

9:20 am on Nov 18, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Zikos your just guessing thats what he does. And hes been flamed for his minds thoughts already.

I concentrate on the tourist arena and if I had all the material and pics, I could push out 4, 5 page bed and breakfast sites easily in a week.

zikos

9:20 am on Nov 18, 2005 (gmt 0)



"it seems like recp links are dead in the water,"
In the contrary my friend interlinked networks are kings ,I have made a tone of spam reports about those interlinkfarming nets at Google spam report ,but nothing happened.They dominate everywhere.

zikos

9:31 am on Nov 18, 2005 (gmt 0)



" I could push out 4, 5 page bed and breakfast sites easily in a week. "
Right ,but to do that originally you must spend 2 weeks time and a river of cash to go door to door at any bed and breakfast from Lands End up to the High Lands........

soapystar

9:33 am on Nov 18, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



yes, this to me has been the big shocker. At one time Google was really on top of the networked sites. This time around networks are doing very nicely thank you.

I could push out 4, 5 page bed and breakfast sites easily in a week.

the fact that you havent i would assume means youve decided that would be spamming.

[edited by: soapystar at 9:35 am (utc) on Nov. 18, 2005]

Eazygoin

9:35 am on Nov 18, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Good Morning folks,

Well, it was good whilst it lasted! Two days ago, my stats went up 7x the norm on Google traffic. Yesterday, it dropped to 3x, and today its back to where it started , before the increase.

So, I guess they've wound back somewhere. It'll be interesting to see where we go from here :-)

By the way, I'm not whining, just commenting...lol!

zimba

9:38 am on Nov 18, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Reseller>>

>>However, at this stage of Jagger update we might need to ask ourselves; how come that an update which has started for around a month ago hasn't migrated completely to other DCs?>>>

Lets take exactly the facts sent to us and stop reading the rest of the rubbish in between.

GG said, Jagger 3 is sitting at *9*. Once its is stable it will migrate across to all DC's.

Honestly there is nothing more that anyone can add to this or take away. Its now just a wait for all of us.

Perhaps we should start talking about what we see at *9* . Ill kick things off with a huge difference seen in plural and singular keywords/phrases..anyone else?

MLHmptn

10:00 am on Nov 18, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member




Perhaps we should start talking about what we see at *9* . Ill kick things off with a huge difference seen in plural and singular keywords/phrases..anyone else?

I have seen quite the contrary. Singular keywords and plural keywords are hitting on the same cylinders at the moment. 's on the end of any keyword is bring the same result sets up.

I still want to see Brett Tabke's 26 steps to Jagger3 success! :>

reseller

10:14 am on Nov 18, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



zimba

>>Reseller
......
Lets take exactly the facts sent to us and stop reading the rest of the rubbish in between.

GG said, Jagger 3 is sitting at *9*. Once its is stable it will migrate across to all DC's.<<

In fact its exactly what I'm doing. GG said that Jagger3 would be migrating to other DCs this week! which hasn't happened yet.

What you see at present at *9* isn't Jagger3 anymore. Jagger3 was supposed to deal with canonical- and supplemental issues as well, which isn't the case.

So we ended now at *9* with something strange which as we say here in Denmark; neither a bird nor a fish :-)

zimba

10:18 am on Nov 18, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Reseller>>> I agree,, Okay its now a case of where GG should really step in... he has some explaining to do. Early next week has now come and gone.

Dayo_UK

10:27 am on Nov 18, 2005 (gmt 0)



>>>>>What you see at present at *9* isn't Jagger3 anymore. Jagger3 was supposed to deal with canonical- and supplemental issues as well, which isn't the case.

Reseller - GG played down that fix long before the supposed Jagger3 hit the *9*.

This 1356 message thread spans 136 pages: 1356