Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Jagger - Part 2

         

Brett_Tabke

1:08 am on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Continued from
[webmasterworld.com...]

Atomic

7:51 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I see the RSS feeds back in the SERPs after they disappeared last night. I just can't imagine XML files holding onto #2 positions. Does anyone think that's what an end user wants to find when searching for their favorite widgety widget? I wonder what the deal is with these files.

g1smd

7:52 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



>> 216.239.53.99
>> 216.239.57.99
>> 66.102.7.99

>> whatever these are displaying, it's completely different than anything I've seen in any jagger datacenter... <<

Those are the results that contain "ancient supplemental pages" going right back to January 2004. Those appeared in the SERPs several months ago. There are other datacentres with them too.

>> they are spreading <<

No. There are at least three different indexes out there.

[edited by: g1smd at 7:53 pm (utc) on Nov. 3, 2005]

petehall

7:52 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Hopefully nobody here is actually trying to judge google results with google cookies on.

What difference will cookies make?!

I see the same with or without...

Are you talking about cache related issues?

petehall

7:54 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



No. There are at least three different indexes out there.

Spot on.

Atomic

7:54 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



64.233.189.104

Seems almost like a rollback because spam sites that were removed are back. I'm really gonna miss them when the real update hits.

aeiouy

8:06 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Folks! you arenīt going to see the final Jagger3 before Friday because we should do some tweaking and other things before we introduce you to Jagger3!

And on that I do agree with Matt. And it was therefore I called the 3 Dcs as Jagger3 Front Troops and not as the final Jagger3 Dcs!

216.239.53.99
216.239.57.99
66.102.7.99

Only problem is when they said we won't see Jagger 3 until at least friday, I think they meant we will not see Jagger 3 until friday.. Not more crazy speculation that has persisted for the last 5 days where people have claimed to see Jagger 3 on 501,234 data centers to-date.

Everyone needs to stop with the wild-haired "seeing of Jagger 3" and wait until Jagger 3 is actually presented.

SEOTard

8:06 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



it has taken me this long to realize that researching and analyzing datacenters is a COMPLETE waste of my time. Reading everybody stating "this is it", "no - this is it". "Here it comes", "no - it hasn't come yet".

Flame away but it is kinda pathetic.

Wake me up when the update is over.

Atomic

8:12 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



it has taken me this long to realize that researching and analyzing datacenters is a COMPLETE waste of my time. Reading everybody stating "this is it", "no - this is it". "Here it comes", "no - it hasn't come yet".

Where is Hans Blix when you need him.

spaceylacie

8:14 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I liked it when we were taking bets on which DCs were showing what will be the closest to the final Jagger 3 results. I have my money on 66.102.11.99. This DC was "visible" in my default G very briefly today and these same results keep briefly popping up in other DCs as well. I'm thinking these results will be "visible" elsewhere and back in my default tomorrow or this weekend. Sites back from the dead are in that DC and previously "sandboxed" sites are also appearing in that DC. Also, it's totally different results than I've seen ever. And I'm not just talking about my sites, but all the top 10s for my niche under a variety of keywords.

Atomic

8:19 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I noticed that if you search for Matt Cutts on Google he's dropped a spot in the SERPs.
This 1222 message thread spans 123 pages: 1222