Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
Please help!
I was reading through all your comments during the last weeks, but did not find the answer for my problem.
I have a "new" site that got Pagerank during Jagger1 except my homepage that has a pagrank of 0. All other pages and subpages have a PR form 4-6.
I was hoping that during Jagger2 it will change, but nothing has happened.
Any ideas about or solution for that?
Thanks for any comments indeed.
The sites that I have had problems with especially look encouraging on allinanchors - eg some Homepages ranking :)
Got me thinking, what if these are three separate updates that will yield 3 unique resulting SERPS and the flux after Jagger3 is stable will be the merging of the 3 sets of results?
So jagger2 would not in fact be built on top of jagger1 but in isolation as would jagger3.
Just a passing thought, I was assuming that jagger2 was an extention of jagger1.
I have yet to call you or anyone else names, let's maintain the peace please ;) <<<<
I honestly found that nonrelevant post quite amusing ;P...It kinda felt good reading something that excluded an IP adress within it's content....but for the purposes of this thread...I would have to say I understand Walkman's viewpoint.
...there should of been a google related punch at the end at least!
FlowerUK, this is quite common I think for new websites that built incoming links right before an update.
Your pagerank will be consistent throughout your site starting form the next PR update IMO. So you will have to wait 3-4 months.
No big deal, already seen that in the past, can't explain it though, but so far it would never prevent you from having great rankings in the future.
How long ago did ou launch the site - or was indexed by G?
It looks like with Jagger that its only including sites older than 3 months.
Hi Folks!
Those of you who do art painting know this feeling for sure: you don't wish to show anybody your work until you have finished. Reasons mightbe that people tend to judge your work too early without even knowing how the final painting will look like.
Thats exactly how GoogleGuy and Matt Cutts feel at present. They just don't wish us to see the stegs of "creating" Jagger3, but wish us to wait and see the final Jagger3 in action.
It was/is therefore our good kind friends GoogleGuy and Matt keep telling us that Jagger3 will not be visible before Friday or during the weekend. Fair enough, I do understand and appreciate keeping in mind that we as webmasters are known for being very impatient people.
Having said that, nothing chage the fact that we have noticed today the start of Jagger3 or the first sub-stages of Jagger3 on one or more of the DCs I mentioned in previous posts;
216.239.53.99
216.239.57.99
66.102.7.99
To make things very clear and very simple, I'm just asking our good friends GoogleGuy or/and Matt Cutts to post few words to the effect that we are wrong and the serps of the said DCs aren't related to Jagger3 at all.
And for that I say a BIG THANK YOU in advance to GG & Matt.
[edited by: reseller at 9:49 pm (utc) on Nov. 3, 2005]
If J3 is basically a re-indexing couldn't Google then pick the best aspects of J1 & J2 and throw them into that new index and push it out the door?
