Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Jagger - Part 2

         

Brett_Tabke

1:08 am on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Continued from
[webmasterworld.com...]

FlowerUK

9:47 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Thanks Folowgreg and stevexyz,

My site was first indexed by google in February, but real content was loaded only in early June.

I have some regional and directory links pointing to the site that was started only in September.

aeiouy

9:48 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I have to admit I fell over laughing after watching all the speculation here of where people keep seeing Jagger 3... Yet Matt Cutts just said that Jagger 2 is not even fully propogated yet.

I don't know why I find it so funny.. But I do. Although this should reinforce the idea that this are distinct and non-related changes for those who seem to believe otherwise.

We will likely see some of Jagger 3 on some dc's before Jagger 2 has gotten to all of them.

Atomic

9:50 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Not liking this Canonical Killer nick since that is ironically waaaay to close to my real name.

BradStevens

9:51 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>>>MATT CUTTS: Multiple data centers are now showing Jagger2, but I don’t think every data center is.<<<

>>RESELLER: Having said that, nothing chage the fact that we have noticed today the start of Jagger3<<<

Oy vey! Hang in there, Reseller, it'll all be ok. Avoid the bottle of little pink pills!

followgreg

9:52 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member




FlowerUK >> IMO, you can relax then, this is happening quite often as I said :) No problem at all for the future. Good luck!

webdude

9:55 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Matt Said,
November 3, 2005 @ 1:39 pm

Let’s see. Multiple data centers are now showing Jagger2, but I don’t think every data center is. I believe Jagger2 is at the cluster of data centers that includes 66.102.9.104. Stephen, I don’t think we support crawl-delay in robots.txt. But you might check out sitemaps–it might allow you more control.

Paul, the objective of Jagger is to improve our index results. The three stages are actually three independent launches.

urdudesamy, there are some Jagger1-related changes going on at 66.102.7.104.

StriderUK

9:56 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>>>MATT CUTTS: Multiple data centers are now showing Jagger2, but I don’t think every data center is.<<<
>>RESELLER: Having said that, nothing chage the fact that we have noticed today the start of Jagger3<<<

Reseller, you make me laugh... you really do! Thanks!

FlowerUK

9:57 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Thanks followgreg again.

I relax and wait for google as usual...:)

spaceylacie

10:12 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Matt: "I believe Jagger2 is at the cluster of data centers that includes 66.102.9.104."

Ahhhh, the DC I mentioned, 66.102.11.99, is showing the same results as above mention by MC. At least I sort of got the real Jagger 2 pegged. Everything will move from there. I still think I know the direction this is headed.

reseller

10:12 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Jagger1..Jagger2..Jagger3 ...What are they about?

Hi Folks

Just for the benifit of our new kind fellow members.

Jagger Update, which was announced officially on 18 October 2005, but which might have started already on 22nd September 2005, is divided to 3 individual separate stages:

- Jagger1 (PR & Backlinks update)

- Jagger2 (dealing with spam issues)

- Jagger3 (dealing with index issues including canonicals and maybe supplementals issues)

In Matt's own words:
"Jagger1, Jagger2, and Jagger3 are mostly independent changes, but they�re occurring closely enough in time (plus they interact to some degree) that it�s clearer just to act as if they were one update for feedback purposes."

Which means, IMO, that Jagger3, in order to start, it doesn't need to wait for Jagger1 or Jagger2 to spread to all the DCs.

I hope this helps.

This 1222 message thread spans 123 pages: 1222