Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
Until Jagger3 hits - then this is worth watching - and for a while afterwards.
But if Spacey knows what is going to happen - any chance of letting the rest of us know ;)
[edited by: Dayo_UK at 7:12 pm (utc) on Nov. 2, 2005]
I think that's telling us something.
I hope so. I took a small hit but it's a fair drop.
You will get 2 results.
1. A site that copied this sentence from my website.
2. and a supplemental result of a site that used http-proxy to steal my site.
My site is not listed for that sentence. now press the "repeat the search with the omitted results included" link and my site will pop up. I have been outrank by a supplemental result....boy I must be a very bad at what I am doing. BTW my site is gone on serps...A pure White hat site.
Maybe I'll keep that site for MSN(page 1) and Yahoo(page 2) and make a new site just to target G.
Oh well, the results overall are better and that would seem to G's goal.
which DC?
There is no internal duplicate content on my site.
Also, I'm not using php, this site is just simple html.
But as far as external dupe content goes, I can copy and paste random sentences from pretty much every page of the site and put them in google and find 30 other sites that stole that entire article. But this is a long standing problem that hasn't effected me before. I don't know if it is now, but if so, what could I do about it? Report 100+ sites to Google?
Problem is a site that is never updated or changed for several years is unlikely to be deserving of a top spot in the index.So the fact that such pages held high-rankings for so-long indicate things were broken before. Removal of such sites is actually an indicator of improvement.
Unless your site is based on ancient history.
aeiouy, do you realize what little sense that statement makes? You are basically saying that good information becomes less useful over time.
