Update Jagger, Google Update Oct 18th, 2005

When can we expect a new PR update?

[jretzer]

Continued from here:
[webmasterworld.com...]

---

Anyone have any guesses as to when we can expect a new systemwide PR update?

[Dayo_UK]

Looking at that DC again - and I dont know if others can confirm - it looks to me like stage 1 has not effected that DC.....?

Very hard to tell - but what I was seeing develop out of the first stage certainly does not look like it has hit that DC.

Time will tell - for me when people first started noticing changes on 66.102.7.104 - they are nothing like what was displayed a few days after first noticed.

[nzmatt]

"Am I behind the times"

- I must be too, big differences if you include "in, and, the etc...."

[discobiscuit]

It looks like a very "pre-jagger" serp for the industry i am watching.

Well in the UK anyway

[lee_sufc]

looking at [66.102.9.99...] again, it seems as though my site has dropped down loads but sites around me haven't changed too much - I really hope this doesn't happen...

[nzmatt]

"I think this update had something to do with network interlinking spam."

I have seen a couple of competitors loose out that have split what should be one site into 5 domains all interlinked and with same reciprocals...

[discobiscuit]

Could someone explain what "network interlinking spam" is please?

[GoogleGuy]

McMohan, good eyes in spotting some changes at 66.102.9.104. I expect Jagger2 to start at 66.102.9.x. It will probably stay at 1-2 data centers for the next several days rather than spreading quickly. But that data center shows the direction that things will be moving in (bear in mind that things are fluxing, and Jagger3 will cause flux as well).

Matt Cutts posted how to send feedback on Jagger1 at [mattcutts.com...]

If you're looking at 66.102.9.x and have new feedback on what you see there (whether it be spam or just indexing related), please use the same mechanism as before, except use the keyword Jagger2. I believe that our webspam team has taken a first pass through the Jagger1 feedback and acted on a majority of the spam reports. The quality team may wait until Jagger3 is visible somewhere before delving into the non-spam index feedback.

If things stay on the same schedule (which I can't promise, but I'll keep you posted if I learn more), Jagger3 might be visible at one data center next week. Folks should have several weeks to give us feedback on Jagger3 as it gradually becomes more visible at more data centers.

[edited by: GoogleGuy at 8:53 am (utc) on Oct. 26, 2005]

[Dayo_UK]

Thanks GG for confirmation.

Next week early or late ;) (Cant wait - he he - fingers,legs and eyes crossed.)

Oh and Good night.

[thecityofgold2005]

' Could someone explain what "network interlinking spam" is please?'

Sorry, that is my own term invented only today.

I mean when a website has many other sites under it's control which it links together to feed pr to the main site.

[reseller]

GoogleGuy

Thanks for updating us. Much appreciated.