Forum Moderators: martinibuster
For example, a click on an ad for digital cameras on a web page about photography tips may be worth less than a click on the same ad appearing next to a review of digital cameras.
[edited by: markus007 at 8:08 pm (utc) on April 1, 2004]
Words like "free", "reduced", "discount", could become poison words for some advertisers - what are the chances of selling an expensive product to web-surfers chasing those terms.
We have had some good threads about semantics over the last few months which i must reread.
Meanwhile, over in the Google Adwords forum, Adwords Advisor said that Google would be charging advertisers lower CPC and that "many of you will be pleased."
Not really sure how this advertisers pay less but publishers earn more formula is going to work.
Meanwhile, over in the Google Adwords forum, Adwords Advisor said that Google would be charging advertisers lower CPC and that "many of you will be pleased."
Well, this obviously is meant to cater to the advertisers. I am not saying that is a bad idea, after all they are Google’s customers. We are …. Hmmmm what is the best word {partners}.
Words like "free", "reduced", "discount", could become poison words for some advertisers…
This is going to be kind of a problem for those of us giving something out for free. :D
CTR is the same as for the last 7 days and for March.
EPC is the same as for the last 7 days and for March.
Even the ads appear to be the same as they were before the changeover, at least on the pages that I check now and then.
Granted, it's early days yet, and advertisers haven't had a chance to respond to the changes. But so far, on a site that gets about 11,000 visitors a day, both the ads and the numbers represent business as usual.