Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from

Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Lost in Google

6:39 pm on Feb 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:June 17, 2003
votes: 0

My site has been in 1st page serps for many years. Just a few weeks ago, my listing went from a title display and decription to just this:

Similar pages

In addition, my Yahoo listing disappeared as well. I then did a Yahoo search for pages with my domain included and found most of my interior pages indexed but not my home page.

What happened? Is it possible my site was not ready to be crawled when Googlebot and Slurp robots visied my site - simultaneously?

This is a very "white hat" site - no tricks at all, just good content...

I went and manually requested my site be spidered on both Google and Yahoo, and sent an email to Yahoo requesting any explanation as well.

Is there anything else I can do? Any ideas of why this happened?

11:30 pm on Mar 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:Nov 11, 2003
votes: 0

All, after 18 months of owning a website spending most of my time building content I donít claim to know an eighth of what most of you know. What I do know is my site has been hijacked by three different sites and I now receive less than 5% of the traffic I used to and it appears to be dropping by the day.

Iím amazed this isnít the topic of every Web newsletter on the net this week, but it isnít. Weíve all heard the old saying ďthat will never happen to meĒ. After seeing a friend go through this a few months ago I foolishly said ďthat will never happen to meĒ. Well it has and I can assure you if your website or sites are good which I suspect they are it will happen to you in the very near future if it hasnít already.

The ball is in Goggleís court to do something. We can suggest ideas all day long however
Itís up to them to act. Thereís power in numbers so please take five minutes of your evening tonight to drop Google a quick e-mail telling them how your site has been ruined by hijackers or if youíre one of the lucky ones who hasnít been hijacked yet your concerns of being hijacked. Like I said earlier I never thought it would happen to me, but it did and I canít describe to you the sick feeling Iíve had since I discovered my site was hijacked. Act now or act later itís up to you.

11:58 pm on Mar 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 23, 2003
votes: 0

newwebguy1, this issue has been brought to google's attention over and over and over and over (u get the picture) again. end result: same problem, nothing done.
11:59 pm on Mar 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:June 15, 2003
votes: 5

Finally i managed to get through the whole thread. Good work and nice posts everyone :)

Now it's past midnigt here, so i don't really have time to write a lot, other than that japanese is right in most of the stuff about how this works. There are some minor tech details and some wording issues, but by and large he's got it 100% right.

(please don't use so many capital letters, though, it hurt my eyes)

Also, IncrediBILL is right above - there are legitimate referrers and it would not be good banning those, as that way nobody could link to you. It's a very tricky situation and there's no apparent solution that the individual webmaster can use. I do know my .htaccess stuff ;)

It must be fixed by Google - they are the ones that have created this problem by indexing "pages" that don't exist [1]. So, they should fix it.

Before i'm off to bed, i will just point to this thread i started in May 2004: What about those redirects, copies and mirrors? [webmasterworld.com]

I have been following this and related issues since sometime in 2003, and they have not been fixed yet.

[1] Note: You're right here as well, japanese. I have used that term myself before as well. I'll post the specifics later.

12:13 am on Mar 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Nov 18, 2002
votes: 0

Does anyone know if G has a problem indexing Doublely 301 redirected pages?

MikeNoLastName: You may be confusing one problem for another. I don't think the redirect from domain.com to www.domain.com is going to cause any problems. However, the permanent redirect to newdomain.com (assuming newdomain.com is really a brand new, just registered domain) is probably going to cause problems with the so-called 'sandbox' problem.

The sandbox problem prevents new sites from ranking for their terms, even though the site may be in the index. Your permanent redirect is essentially saying "dont go do olddomain.com/page.htm anymore, since it's moved permanently to newdomain.com/page.htm". Google removes oldomain.com/page.htm from the index, spiders newdomain.com/page.htm, and then puts it in the sandbox.

Matt Cutts had said at one of the conferences that Googlebot can follow multiple redirects fairly well, as long as they aren't four or five levels deep. I think you've got the sandbox working against you.

1:46 am on Mar 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

Administrator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator incredibill is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Jan 25, 2005
votes: 99

The only good script is a script that bears the hallmark of googleís approval.

I never asked google to approve my redirects, didn't know they needed to be consulted on this.

Alexa must disclose whether their redirecting method is indeed been approved by google.

I'm at a loss for words, hard to think while cachinnating

1:51 am on Mar 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:May 10, 2003
votes: 13

Hi Johnrichd,
Thanks for the suggestion. No in this case both domains have been around for a very long time and both were PR5's (now wxy.com is a PR6). None of the pages which disappeared were redirected (in fact they were the ones which I specifically had NOT yet moved to the 'new' domain since they were ranking so well (all top #1-5 in their keywords. Now they aren't even in the index and GBot hasn't visited the domain since 2/28 despite re-submits. (Is everyone else getting an "about.htm?zzzz not found" error when trying to submit on G?)
It's looking more to me like all the pages which recently disappeared are the same ones that clk.about.com has recently started framing.
2:06 am on Mar 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

Administrator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator incredibill is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Jan 25, 2005
votes: 99


Thanks for the heads-up on About.com, just dropped in a frame buster script on my site to stop that nonsense.

6:36 am on Mar 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 27, 2005
votes: 0


Many thanks for joining this thread. Your input will be much valued here.

I tried to join webmasterworld with the nickname of altavista but a .htaccess file called Brett presented me with a 403 access denied. So I changed my nickname to Japanese and was presented with a 200. I hope I am not seen here as a Trojan and marked for deletion..

I have read some fabulous posts in many different threads here but this problem with googlebots ability to generate pages when it encounters particular 302 redirects is probably going to dwarf the sandbox issue.

I think that it already has and more and more people are seeing their sites collapse into total oblivion at great expense to them. Very little reference is ever made to any other search engine. Google is the internet and many loyal fans are not happy.

7:25 am on Mar 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 13, 2002
votes: 0

While I am confident that Google is well aware of the problem, waiting around for them to fix it is just not an option for those whose businesses have been hit hard. If it were my bread and butter site that got hit I'd be swimming in the mortgage and really up the creek.

I suggest we think in terms of how to arm ourselves as webmasters to prevent this happening on a local level to each and everyone of us personally.

Last night I had a friend of mine who is a programmer come over and we talked about a whole range of solutions which we will begin testing tonight, all of which can be implemented by a webmaster either on your site or server.

I think it is fundamental that we share ideas regardless of how silly they may seem.

In my particular case it is not just 1 web site that has a redirect pointed at 1 of my web sites, it is a network of web sites (at last count 50) that are deliberately using hidden redirects - even to the point of changing the statis bar to appear to point at the sites whose content they are stealing - in order to take advantage of the many hours of optimization so they can rocket to the top for every conceivable search possible.

In most of the cases they have their throwaway domains all on 1 server with similar IP addresses, I know their names and the name of who has the server. Can this information be used to "report" them or "denounce" them so they can no longer do so?

For example, could there be a "black list" (either by IP or or registrant) which can be verified by Google?

As far as a localized solution is concerned, how about implementing a script on our web sites that goes something like this:

If referral comes from X, or if referral string is longer than Y return 404. The reason why length of referral string is important is because the hijackers are using a long string to hide the redirect from the spider.

Actually what we are considering is returning the exact copy of the referrer string so that it creates a loop, but I'm not sure what effect it will have on the server I use.

7:30 am on Mar 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Nov 20, 2003
votes: 0

googlebot doesn't carry referrers.
it merely adds each url it finds to a database and then goes and indexes those urls at a later date.
7:49 am on Mar 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 13, 2002
votes: 0

googlebot doesn't carry referrers

Stargeek are you suggesting the script wouldn't work for Google? I think you are right. Google will continue to index my content as if it were the hijacker's content. The idea of the script however is to make it so the users have problems with the hijacker's sites, making it a problem for them to have a redirect to my site.

8:31 am on Mar 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 9, 2003
votes: 0

Good news. Google is doing something about site scrappers. The network of scrapper sites that I was referring to only afew days ago has been removed, completely, not even in the index.

Finally Google is banning sites again. If they're gaming the system, then they'll have to pay the price.

8:59 am on Mar 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Nov 5, 2002
votes: 0

Great news here too! The network of redirecting subdomains I reported to google only 2 days ago is totally Gone from their index. Also the pseudo 'search engine' that tied it all together.
These sites also no longer appear in my allinurl: search.
Apparently they DO read their spam reports! )
9:28 am on Mar 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Oct 6, 2004
votes: 0

I reported some a week ago and they are still there.
9:32 am on Mar 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

joined:June 2, 2003
votes: 0

1milehgh80210, pretty good news!

During the weekend, I sent an e-mail to a spammer:


"Please eliminate ASAP the following link:

"Otherwise, I'll contact Google to report the address

"You have 48 hours to eliminate the link."

Well, all links to MY_SITE were eliminated within the 48 hours.

Nevertheless, it's good to know Google does take action against spammers via reports.

Google rocks!

This 206 message thread spans 14 pages: 206

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members