Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Brandy Part 2

         

GoogleGuy

8:24 am on Feb 13, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Continued from: [webmasterworld.com...]


steveb, I believe the 64.x.x.x data center has the change, but I'm not positive. We use different terminology inside Google. :)

Powdork, I'm not sure if you'd call it an update exactly (different algorithms play more of a role than different data). But I'm guessing the change will probably roll out over the course of the weekend.

newwebster

2:29 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



We are getting close to full propagation. I am seeing fresh tags for the 12th and 13th.

Hissingsid

2:39 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



We are getting close to full propagation. I am seeing fresh tags for the 12th and 13th.

Sorry to be a pedant but where are you seeing these?

I'm seeing them on the 64 range and on 216.* but not on www www2 www3 or any of the European .de .fr .ie .es etc DCs.

Best wishes

Sid

Hissingsid

2:50 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



All my pages are still in Google with no titles or cache and Googlebot has stopped visiting. Will I be back when Brandy is complete? If not is there anything I can do to get back, given that I have scanned my site and can find no reason for any penalty.

There was a long thread on this last month. I seem to remember it had something to do with a domain resolving for two URLs. Like www.domain.com and domain.com. This looks like you have two duplicate sites to Google because one redirects to the other. I've seen lots of these redirecting URLs in the index lately with no cache or description. Perhaps your DNS administrator has changed how the two forms resolve and this has caused the problem.

Can't see why the problem you describe would have anything to do with this update "Brandy". I'd go and read back and do some investigating.

Best wishes

Sid

jocelynd

2:53 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



CuriousMusing : The visible PR update happend Mon-Tue...

BeeDeeDubbleU

2:57 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Thanks for the input Sid but I was not blaming my plight on Brandy. I was actually hoping that there would be something in the Brandy update that would fix my problem?

Ledfish

3:02 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I like this results, from my location, I'm seeing the new results on www and with fresh tags.

I feel like its a whole new day again!

jady

3:04 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Still no Real Estate websites... Also note directories are dominating different industries/search phrases.

I think directories are anoying and useless - they make a user search Google, then have to plow through a directory to find what they are looking for!

Google - why give directories the top rankings for Real Estate searches as well as many other industries?

millie

3:22 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I'm seeing 216. on aol.com and aol.co.uk - I like it.
I like 64. too, though it's not as good for me as 216. would be. Better for the user though.

Am starting to see movement on www inc freshies for 12th and 13th, but nothing like the promised 64. so I certainly hope there are more changes to come. If things settle now I've had it.

wine_guru

3:24 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hi - Can I check that it is 64.233.161.99 that is the latest update? If so I'll be a happy bunny after dropping way down the list since the November updates. It'll mean we're back where I hoped to be for our main keywords, which will be nice :)

jocelynd

3:27 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



It looks like they did fix the sub-domains and sub-dir issues.
Some SERPS were dominated by some of these URL spammy sites.
On one, I was bumped to page 7-8 because 40 out of the 50 1st results were owned by one of these sites...
From the 6th page, we had half of the pages for other sites...
Much better!

jocelynd

3:29 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



wine_guru : Here (Canada), the new results are on google.com already. About 30 Min ago.

Jakpot

3:30 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



All my pages are still in Google with no titles or cache and Googlebot has stopped visiting. Will I be back when Brandy is complete? If not is there anything I can do to get back, given that I have scanned my site and can find no reason for any penalty.

I have exactly the same problem in 64.233.161.99 with 75% of my pages
showing a url only - no title or cache. These are Lycos (Tripod) web pages.

wine_guru

3:42 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Thanks Jocelynd..

Google.co.uk seems to still be showing the old results, but on 64.233.161.99 we're where we were in November (or better!) position wise.

Be nice to be back as I couldn't work out why we'd suddenly been shunted way down the list (from being between #1 and #5 to being #900+) - it didn't seem fair to say the least!

Anyway, if the end result looks like what's showing on 64.233.161.99 I'll be opening something good from the warehouse tonight to celebrate.

Would anyone mind taking a look at a page I've just been playing with and give me their opinion if I've over egged the omelette KW wise? I'm a bit of a novice at this :)

ntrance

3:49 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I havent seen any changes in PR for any sites -although I have seen changes to our total backlinks for a number of sites a couple of days ago.

Essex_boy

4:19 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Im not back yet either.

Oh yeah and leave Vanillia coke alone I love it.

I wonder how long this is going to take?

sonny

4:21 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



No pr updates for me, yet. Or maybe they haven't changed. hmmm.

FrankWeb

4:31 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Well I see for a lot of keywords that the amazone results are now gone on most keywords that I track.

That is very nice as it did not bring anything good to the results most of the time. Good job Google!

Can't wait to see the full impact on our sites with these new results.

Nacho

4:37 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



In my opinion and from what I saw with my sites on the Austin Update, G affected sites with non or little inbound links to remove A LOT of spam appearing in the top serps. (Perhaps this will not be the case for many of you.)

In the Brandy algo change I see very good serps with high keyword relevant sites going back to the top (and a few Amazon clones as well in there in some cases), but much better results.

Any ideas on what part of the algorithm was boosted/lowered to reflect changes in Brandy?

Thanks for all the insight and vision GG and WebmasterWorld members!

Kirby

5:20 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>I think there are still some domain-level niche emphasis tweaks to be made, and some issues involving worthless anchor text

Steve, what do you mean by this? Google bombing or just the importance of anchor text.

It looks to me like anchor text is key. While I see relevant results in my industry as a whole, they rank based on anchor text.

[edited by: Kirby at 6:02 pm (utc) on Feb. 14, 2004]

union_jack

5:24 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I am glad to say some of my sites have come back, and they are the ones I would expect to come back. Better links, more content ect, ect.

My more weaker sites have not and I think although I miss the money they use to make they probably don't deserve to be at the top anymore anyway.

So well done Google for a good job on Brandy and for keeping me on my toes.

dawlish

5:30 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



If these results do roll out across all the datacenters it will certainly be a step in the right direction. In the sectors I follow I notice a return of a number of quality sites to the serps and the directory sites which were previously dominating are now not so prominent. I think that Google is slowly weeding out the spammy sites and is tweaking the filtering to ensure that sites that provide good content are listed. The Florida and Austin updates certainly hit many good websites as well as many more spam / affiliate only sites. With this update I'm seeing a number of the good websites returning whilst the spam / affiliate sites are still be filtered out which is what is best for the end user.

alexdo

6:21 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Most part of webmasters from WW like Brandy. But not me. As CuriousMusing said "slow death" is a real problem fro my site. After Brandy for my keywords nothing changed - each month I loosing additional keywords. It goes since Florida. After first rankings for about 70 KW1KW2 phrases I have now only 5. Tell you the truth - I don't know what to do. I added new content, removed kw density, add new backlinks. Nothing.

Maybe anyone know how to fight with the slow death? How to force google to crawl site properly? How to bring it back to Serps?

A little stupid question but what can I do!?......

P.S. The most interesting that all the other search engines (msn, altavista, alltheweb etc) rank my site as #1 for my main KW1KW2 and I'm in top 5 for the other additional KW. It's a pity that this is only 5% of google traffic for the same KWs

[edited by: alexdo at 6:25 pm (utc) on Feb. 14, 2004]

icebane

6:32 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



www is still showing the old results.
Does anyone know if the propogation happened and I should remove my DNS cache?

Kirby

6:35 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



allan, I found what you are seeing. Large SoCal cities look good, while others, including a <city>, leave much to be desired.

[edited by: Marcia at 10:18 pm (utc) on Feb. 14, 2004]
[edit reason] No specifics, please. [/edit]

GranPops

6:51 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



One interesting change..........for the last 15 days, all sites are crawled daily, with freshdate every 48 hours, the last being 13th.

Well done G.

GranPops

seofreak

7:13 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



granpops .. that isn't new .. i have been observing that for quite sometime now.

Essex_boy

8:46 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Im now back in Google, just not ranked yet. We wait in hope.

SERPS look good at least one of the spam sites from the top has been knocked off.

Any ideas as what to do next?

tambiz

8:50 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)



64 is bad for me.

I agree with an earlier post that "this mechanism is cutting out some of the lovely/cool/unique/informative hobby and mom & pop sites"

My 3 word keyphrase is in a very small niche and I have enjoyed position 6 and 7 for months. With 64 I'm on page 3! Now, you'll see classified ads, small searchengine directories, and a variety of other sites that aren't relevant.

216 is SO much better...much more relevant, although there is one of those directory results on page one, 216 does a much better job of putting the few relevant sites right at the top.

I sure hope 64 doesn't stick, or at least that it's not finished being tweaked. It will ruin me.

caveman

9:12 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Definitely still tweaking, and it would seem a bit more harsh again? At least from this seat.

Since yesterday, I've seen more of those small site relevant pages knocked out.

Also, G, please...get rid of those booksite pages. In one search I did, pages from bookseller sites occupied no less than 8 of the top 30 slots.

On the assumption that even Joe Sixpack doesn't need G to find book sites on the Web, that's eight potentially useful pages out of 30, that are never seen by the searcher. Or, looking at it another way, eight free ad listings to bookseller megasites. ;-)

merlin30

9:30 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Are people seeing the 64.x.x.x results appearing on www? I haven't seen any yet. (I'm in the UK)
This 343 message thread spans 12 pages: 343