Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Reading Tea Leaves

         

Brett_Tabke

11:32 pm on Nov 29, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Heads up for changes at the dc's. Rumors swirling that there have been some changes today momentarily.

squared

7:11 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Let's not forget, though, that Google is not static.

SERPs will likely be very different by the end of the month.

I'm expecting my content rich, high quality, keyword domain information site to come back for its main keyword.

-squared

Terrier

7:20 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



It’s all nonsense, you know and I know its nonsense, but do they know, I doubt it, does Joe Surfer know I doubt it very much, only those of us who watch intently know.

Forget about it, just get on with your daily business of creating pages and refining your site, I did try to get an angle on it, but when I discovered that I had been booted for terms that I had not even targeted or thought about targeting, I knew it was nonsense.

The search world may appear at present to begin and end with Google, just remember everything is cyclical, clichés like winter follows summer, what goes up must come down come to mind.

Take the Long Term view just try to get by, and remember there are going to be big changes at Yahoo soon.

Go60Guy

7:25 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>>I think the distinction would lie in how many "innocent" web sites get toasted in the attempt to eliminate the spam. We all have our views on that in re: this update so let's not rehash it, but I think that's the distinction.<<

Toasting "innocent" and highly relevant websites to combat spam is one of the things that sank AltaVista.

DRGather

7:26 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



question for those who've followed longer than I have....

What is the crawl cycle currently? I get hit everyday by freshie, but it goes no deeper than the homepage. Now I know this is normal, but my cache is updated.... and the description of the site ISN'T. It's like freshie is just updating cache and not the index placement or any other factors. In fact, it's not adding new pages either as it never goes past the HP.

I assume this is normal, but keep hearing about a "rolling update". I know what that is, but don't see any real evidence of it being used. It appears to me they're (possibly) picking up new pages and (definitely) updating cache with freshie, but they're not gonna reindex until the next deep crawl. Doesn't this lend credence to the theory that all our changes (for those making them) won't be fully effective until after the next deep crawl?

Stefan

7:46 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



There is no deepcrawl anymore. It's just deepfreshbot on an ongoing basis.

helenp

8:30 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



anyone checked the link mentioned before to check pages dropped from the first 100?
****/
just checked mine, and checked other sites,
not only index pages been dropped..........

DRGather

8:31 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Really? Hmmm... so what's up with the homepage refreshes and not going any deeper? I've been crawled deeper before, but not in the past 4 or 5 visits at least. No major changes since then either. Are you saying that everytime Google crawls your site you get more pages hit than just the homepage?

Stefan

8:48 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Are you saying that everytime Google crawls your site you get more pages hit than just the homepage?

Yep. Since Nov 16, beginning of florida, it hasn't been as regularly deep as it was for some months before, but it's rare that only my index is taken. Yesterday, it was just a few pages total, the 2 days before that it was taking ~40/day of 160 htm pages, the day before that just a few... I expect it to soon be right back to where it was before florida, about 20 - 30% of the site most days, with the index being constant and the rest of the pages shifting through.

The new pages that get crawled by the bot usually show up in the serps within a few days and stick there without freshtags. The whole update/deepcrawl cycle ended with Dom/Esm. Now it rolls along non-stop, which for me is pretty cool... new pages, if linked internally from a few other pages, show up fast.

claus

8:48 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



1) helenp and others, queries at that site are very interesting, but nevertheless, they show you something else than you think. Indeed the query "foo bar" seems to be just as badly hit as the real estate example mentioned earlier. Here are queries from November 30.:

  • foo bar (70 of 100)
  • turquoise (69 of 100)
  • hello world (61 of 100)
  • red blue (54)
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (39)
  • some random words (28)
  • keyword phrase (26)
  • blue widgets (13)
  • lorem ipsum dolor sit amet (7)
Post #386: [webmasterworld.com...]

2) The order in which you type in your search words is important:

- "my-region map" ~ search for "map" within topic "my-region"
- "map my-region" ~ search for "my-region" within topic "map"

3) I have also seen an improvement in exact search results (two word phrases) today (on www). For some very specific searches (product-code/serialnumber type) i saw an improvement yesterday.

/claus

soapystar

9:10 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



i see a site that is basically about 40-50 subdomains divided into regions and then linked as "discount region widgets"...now he has swapped links by getting sites to place a link to each subdomain from a single page...every links says discount region widgets so now the large number of links makes the link page keyword heavy for "discount"...so all in bound links to all subdomains which all cross link are weighted as "discount" relevant...he has kept top slots across all subs with no content and cross linking for all discount related searches....i think this givs a big clue to how the anchor text filter is working....have a think about it...!

merlin30

9:12 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Here's something I noticed today.

If I search using (without quotes) "kw1 kw2 and kw3" then Google tells me: "The "AND" operator is unnecessary -- we include all search terms by default" implying that it did a search using kw1 kw2 kw3. However, if I actually type the same search without the AND it shows be different results than with the AND. So, despite Google telling me that the AND was unnecessary it actually changed the context of the search.

I don't know if its always been like that but it does illustrate how Google does change the context of searches based on the input operators - and the changed context can lead to very different results.

Google seems to be acting like a baby learning to talk right now.

c1bernaught

9:31 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Try looking for a service/service product like "low interest loan". Search for this term in realation to a city...

"low interest loan in spokane"

Review serps.

Before the florida update this term would give you a list of banks at the top then several affiliates.

Now try the same search using "get", "obtain" or "shop"

Review the serps

Before the florida update this term would return mostly banks....

Cashcows

9:46 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Cisco...

Your are right it is about Adwords Money but it is being done under the guise of a penalty for over optimized sites. And I doubt it will change back maybe the will dial it down a bit over the next few months, but not all at once and not now.

[Edited... Due To the Fact the Sometime The Best Words Are The Ones You Don't Say]

[edited by: Cashcows at 10:15 pm (utc) on Dec. 2, 2003]

merlin30

9:52 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



c1bernaught,

Good example. Googles learning - so must searchers and so must we.

I obtained a similar result doing a search for hotels in a UK city - returns mostly tourist/visitor info type stuff. Now prepend with "book" and looks pre-Florida.

Read Chicken Licken to my kids earlier - they wondered why the poor chicken got eaten - because she didn't think I told them.

[edited by: merlin30 at 9:59 pm (utc) on Dec. 2, 2003]

johnnydequino

9:53 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



In my opinion, google did not make this move to help adwords.

jd

c1bernaught

9:57 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



johnnydequino:

Please expand on your opinion. I am interested to know what your take on all of this is...

rfgdxm1

9:59 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>In my industry, the generic product name is the specific keyword phrase. The results, although they contain the keywords in question, are utterly useless to anyone using the search term to actually look for the product that *is the keyword phrase*. Joe Surfer looking specifically for 'professional doodads' has a reasonable expectation that he will find sites selling professional doodads, not pages that have the words 'professional' and 'doodads' somewehere in them but have nothing to do with professional doodads except in the most ephemeral manner.

Wrong. The person may have no ineterest in buying. Perhaps he is looking for information on the safety of professional doodads, or how to repair them, etc.

c1bernaught

9:59 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



merlin30:

Would you classify the examples I forwarded as good serps, or bad serps? Why?

KevinC

10:02 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



DO NOT BUY ADWORDS get traffic else where.

Wish this was possible - I know my December adwords budget has doubled since this update. But what are the options? Findwhat? Ya right!

Chndru

10:03 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>my December adwords budget has doubled since this update.

Could this be due to holiday season and/or additional competitors?

merlin30

10:04 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The SERPs were good - particularly for my hotel search.

Why - without the context of "purchasing" in mind Google simply returns information - no assumptions the user wants to make a purchase. Add the idea of purchasing to the context and the user is presented with an abundance of relevant places to make the purchase.

c1bernaught

10:04 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



rfgdxm1:

Are you back to the "commercial serps don't matter" thing?

Why do you insist on relevant serps only being those with no monetary bent?

I think your argument is defeated by the very serps you are defending. After all the current serps seem to only serve Googles need for profit.

How many people have seen their Adwords spending go up? Let us know.

Webmasters having to increase spending on Adwords means more Adwords searches, more Adwords searches mean (IMHO) searchers are not finding what they are looking for in the serps and are turning to Adwords...

This means LESS RELEVENT SERPS FOR COMMERCIAL SEARCHES....

johnnydequino

10:12 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



c1bernaught - In my opinion, google made a drastic change due to spammers, black hats, whatever you want to call them.

Sometimes when you are fishing for tuna, a dolphin may get sucked up into the net. When the dolphin is found, it will be set free.

jd

DaveAtIFG

10:16 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Hey guys, on 11/29, Brett's original post in this thread was:
Heads up for changes at the dc's. Rumors swirling that there have been some changes today momentarily.

So has anyone seen any changes at the data centers today?

Cashcows

10:18 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



KevinC I have been trying adwords with a $300 credit I got from Google and it has been the worst traffic I have paid for it I was actually paying for it. Not to mention they are too restrictive on there terms. I am going to try to make a profit from it since I have the $300 credit ( I got it at comdex when they were pushing adwords)

KevinC

10:27 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Could this be due to holiday season and/or additional competitors?

I'm talking about my expected december/holiday season budget, I had a large amount of free traffic coming in before the florida update - now with many of my listings gone I have to pay to get back that traffic.

It sucks - cause well free traffic is free, but I still hold adwords as the #1 way to spend my marketing money, everything else is just garnish. I just wish I had the free traffic for december that I was getting pre-florida.

allanp73

10:33 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I noticed the majority of the discussion here and with the other update threads deals with what things are on the page which could be causing Google to filter them out. After analyzing the serps I noticed that generally the sites that are well ranked for commercial terms have something which the filtered out sites didn't.
This is links. It seems that Google is filtering sites out based on whether or not they lacked outward links rather than page factors. Thus commercial serps are dominated by directories and sites with cross linking. I think Google might even take into account whether these outgoing links are located on the same ip. Thus you couldn't make a directory by just linking to your own sites. You have to link to others. In order to rank well in Google you have to make your site look like at directory. I noticed it gives a bonus to sites which link to others with anchor text that is the search term. Adding a bunch of links at the bottom of the page won't help. There also seems to be a preference to links which appear within a paragraph of text.

So my point is stop de-optimizing it won't work. Look at how to link to others within you money word theme. If Google wants to be the search engine for directories than become the best directory.

I made this observation because I noticed many of the top directories now listed for my phrases are just my link partners. Also, one of client's competitors remained listed for a money term much to the confusion of the client. At first I couldn't figure out why they were ranked #1 but then I noticed that their links actually went to other sites, giving them the appearance of being a directory.

claus

10:39 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>> any changes at the data centers today

- haven't checked dc's, but i've seen better matches of two word phrases...on www. And better "specific tech-matches" too.

>> links
Finally someone else noticed... wrote that somewhere in part two of the Florida update thread.

/claus

nmjudy

10:48 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



www-in.google.com is showing slightly different results...nothing major.

Stefan

10:51 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Since the first post, I only saw slight shifting that seemed like normal activity on the serps I check. They've been mostly info searches but some commercial ones also.

It seems that Google is filtering sites out based on whether or not they lacked outward links rather than page factors.

allanp73, a PR-hogging-link penalty? I might not have followed it...

Remember the discussions in the past about whether hogging PR by having few outward links might eventually be a Google factor? You might have something.

Another good theory, man. Someone should build a list of all the plausible theories and post them somewhere in a spreadsheet... people could dl it, fill in "x's" in the right spots, (possible factors for the missing site), then they could all be correlated.... just a thought.

This 179 message thread spans 6 pages: 179