Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Reading Tea Leaves

         

Brett_Tabke

11:32 pm on Nov 29, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Heads up for changes at the dc's. Rumors swirling that there have been some changes today momentarily.

allanp73

7:23 pm on Dec 1, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I jusst found a really cool site that gives some insight into the devastation caused by Google. Check out **** dot org This site shows the ranking of sites pre-florida and tells how many sites were removed. It is possibly the best search engine now.
I work in the real estate field and I noticed usually 80-90% of the top hundred were removed.

zafile

7:31 pm on Dec 1, 2003 (gmt 0)



Yes, since November 20th, 80 plus "mycountry real estate" Web sites were removed from Google's Top 100.

Those 80 sites were a good representation of "white hat" and "black hat" sites and everything in between.

I had 3 "white hat" sites among the 80. 2 of the 3 were Top 20.

Google's current results are useless for someone looking to buy a property in the short-term.

The results are useless for a US citizen looking to relocate soon. All regional franchise sites such as Century 21, RE/MAX, Coldwell Banker completely removed under the term "mycountry real estate."

Google, put those cheap Linux servers to work properly!

Tropical Island

9:09 pm on Dec 1, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Is Google broken? You bet it is!

I just searched for > myregional area map < and guess what? Google returns "Your search - myregional area map - did not match any documents."!

If I enter > map of my regional area < they return 16,100 results. Can this be filtering to an extreme where the words > myregional area map < are featured everywhere on the page for all 16,100 of us that they have deleted us all.

This is just too unbelievable.

usavetele

9:50 pm on Dec 1, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I can't believe nobody has any real answers to figuring out this stupid Google algo. And I'm really ticked at those that know the algo secret and aren't sharing!

:(

customdy

10:24 pm on Dec 1, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Be interesting to see what the increase in Adwords for the last 2 weeks has been. I normally only spend about
$100/month since we did rank #1-#3 for all our money keywords. I have spend over $1000 in the last two weeks, $0.50 at at time, glad we do not have an expensive keyword.
That will be a 1900% increase for us.

wellzy

10:40 pm on Dec 1, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>>I jusst found a really cool site that gives some insight into the devastation caused by Google. Check out **** dot org This site shows the ranking of sites pre-florida and tells how many sites were removed. It is possibly the best search engine now.

Alan...could u please sticky me the URL? Thanks

markus007

10:42 pm on Dec 1, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Check out this Inman Article on googles algo change..

[inman.com...]

Evidently they are considered the "authority" in the world of real estate.

DRGather

10:44 pm on Dec 1, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



So... how does this great new search engine help our G results exactly? Staring at a snapshot of the past does nothing to improve our future.

Just Guessing

10:52 pm on Dec 1, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>> I can't believe nobody has any real answers to figuring out this stupid Google algo. And I'm really ticked at those that know the algo secret and aren't sharing!

The algo secret is a combination of Word Stemming which in some case mixes together the results of singular and plural keyword matches etc., but more importantly a shift in the weighting of keyword proximity which now ranks a spread of individual keywords higher than an exact phrase matches. Repeated exact phrase matches are especially penalised (except for exact phrase searches, of course!). Put these two changes together and the results are churned around so much that many previous top ranking pages are now outside the magic 1000 results (wiped out).

No doubt there are other changes too, especially to do with the weighting of anchor text which helps directory pages.

The link with Adwords terms is an effect, not the cause. Most "Commercial" Search Terms have many, many pages with the exact phrase repeated several times on the page (just normal optimisation, of course). These are the worst hit pages. Of course, that may or may not have been Google's intention, but they didn't need to use the Adwords database to do it - it's just a big algorithm change!

There may be other things happening, but this is the main explanation for the "Commercial Filter".

And massive PageRank still helps Amazon, etc.

Just Guessing (after many hours of detailed analysis!)

[edited by: Just_Guessing at 10:55 pm (utc) on Dec. 1, 2003]

biggles

10:52 pm on Dec 1, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I can't believe nobody has any real answers to figuring out this stupid Google algo. And I'm really ticked at those that know the algo secret and aren't sharing!

I see that Planet Ocean Search Engine News are claiming to have the answer:

"Google's Over-Optimization Penalty Bites sites! ...here's what you should do immediately to avoid permanent penalties!"

$97 buys you the secret WebmasterWorld and numerous other forums are still trying to determine. Hmm... ;-)

allanp73

11:14 pm on Dec 1, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I just found using the **** site something really cool. It seems even Google is a spammer. If you type "google" into the search you'll notice even Google's sites were filtered. I think it's cool that even Google gets penalized. I always knew they wore a big black hat.

merlin30

11:24 pm on Dec 1, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I agree with Just Guessing, plus Google's emerging ability to relate meanings.In a recent thread on this board GG intimated as much. So "cheap" may also relate to "low cost" or "discount". And the effects are probably applied to link text as well as page content.

Furmanov

11:26 pm on Dec 1, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I wonder if anybody is already selling "Google s**ks" and "keyword1 keyword2 -asdf" t-shirts :)? with all those unhappy webmasters this sounds like a good business idea, if I wasn't on the other side of the globe (shipping would be too expensive) i would give it a try... the only problem, nobody would find my shop searching for "google s***s t-shirts"...

mods, sorry for off-topic, just couldn't resist :)

crankin

11:35 pm on Dec 1, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



furmanov - one word, dude: cafepress

welcome to middleman capitalism ;)

drewls

11:39 pm on Dec 1, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I think either these tea leaves are lying or someone isn't reading them correctly, because I don't see any major changes beyond some shuffling amongst the filtered data.

Stefan

11:45 pm on Dec 1, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Interesting article, markus007, nice find.

Seeing it all from WW, it's mostly in the abstract for me... it's cool seeing it "out there", rather than in the posts. Is that source for the article, (I won't mention the name), one of the WW members by any chance?

zafile

11:53 pm on Dec 1, 2003 (gmt 0)



Google's current results are useless for someone looking to buy a property in the short-term.

The results are useless for a US citizen looking to relocate soon. All regional franchise sites such as Century 21, RE/MAX, Coldwell Banker were completely removed under the term "mycountry real estate."

Google, put those cheap servers to work properly!

zafile

12:04 am on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)



I just checked the article at [inman.com...] .

I also checked the real estate site mentioned on paragraph 10 of the article. The lower part of that page includes links that seem fraudulent to me.

I don't use that kind of "black hat" techniques on my sites.

helenp

12:10 am on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



zafile, I donīt see whats ilegal in it.
cut itīs not even ranked in google...............

just forget this, whick url is the ilegal one?

zafile

12:14 am on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)



It doesn't matter what's fraudulent on that site (the domain mentioned in paragraph 10).

I don't think most sites were removed because of penalties.

A glitch on Google's algorithm seems more likely.

squared

12:19 am on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Zafile,

I'm starting to agree. But I don't think Google would admit it.

-squared

DRGather

12:24 am on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I really don't care if they admit it or not. As long as they FIX it.

It's an algo change alright, but not like others are indicating I don't think. It's more than likely a "glitch" IN their "algo change" which would make everyone right.

zafile

12:24 am on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)



A glitch was acknowledged by Google in October: "Google spokesman Nathan Tyler acknowledged this week that the company has found a bug that it is working on, but he declined to elaborate."

[washingtonpost.com...]

squared

12:28 am on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Zafile,

The article is from October 12.

<edit>oops, didn't realize that it was in quotes</edit> DOH!

my bad,
squared

zafile

12:31 am on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)



I know, but taking into account that Google uses a bunch of cheap servers (no need to mention the OS), that bug could have returned when they fired the new algo...

squared

12:34 am on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Yeah. It could be a single bit that screwed everything up. Maybe it should have been a 1 instead of a 0.

zafile

12:35 am on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)



Did you read the following:

"Because of a bug in Google's software, Finkelstein said, Google's search engine essentially crashes when it hits certain combinations of words."

Tribewolf

12:37 am on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hint: It's a time/date thing that should get worked out after the next deepcrawl results are added. This same thing happened after Dominick. Florida=Dominick, What's Next=Esmarelda, then everything is back to normal.

By time/date thing I mean that your listing is affected based on when it acheived the placement for the keyword(s) that it is (or is not) missing for now. If you got your top 20 spot more than a year ago then chances are it has held through all of this. If you got your spot within the year then you've been bumped to who knows where.

So you've been bumped not because you have been filtered out. You've been bumped because you haven't been filtered in. Stop the panic.

zafile

12:45 am on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)



You're wrong Tribewolf.

This is a different glitch.

I agree that the May update had something to do with a time/date issue.

But last month's update removed a bunch of sites. 80 plus out of 100 from the term I follow.

I'm relaxed because my sites target a bunch of different search terms. Traffic is only down 15 to 20%.

nippi

12:52 am on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



top 10 realestate sites in my area were almost unchanged for 3 years.

now, all of the top 20 are gone and replaced with newspaper, ezine, of portal site with a link containing suburb real estate somewhere on an inner page

i don't think website age is the issue, though I have also seen my two youngest sites tumble. Old site have gone as well. Perhpas it is the more recently done sites that are overkeyworded.

This 179 message thread spans 6 pages: 179