Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Florida - Nov 2003 Google Update Part 2

         

GoogleGuy

4:50 pm on Nov 17, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Continued from part 1: [webmasterworld.com...]


I stopped by several times yesterday, but it seemed like people were into the analysis stage already. caveman, this update didn't add any penalties for hyphenated domains, so that's not a factor. Just a reminder that people with specific feedback (good or bad) can send it to webmaster [at] google.com with the keyword "floridaupdate" somewhere in the email. I've mentioned that a few times, but as more than one person has pointed out, it can take 2-3 hours to read the whole thread from beginning to end. :)

batdesign

12:49 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Florida seems to be following the same process as DomEsme so with any luck the return of index pages will also occur given time. The site of mine that has dropped is the same site that dropped after Dominic. All others ok, pretty much stable. This dropped site is about 18 months old, but has only ranked for a year.

The only thing that concerns me is whether sites returned after DomEsme due to the number of complaints and feedback leading to a googletweak, or whether it was just part of the process.

I've emailed feedback to google. I hope everyone moaning here has also done so ;)

Lets just hope the indexes return a little quicker than last time...

killipso

12:59 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Well on the positive side maybe this is whats up with the index pages.
Maybe they are sites being spidered that had new content when florida hit.
Ever notice your site dissapear for a day or two when the dance is going on. I have.
Just a positive thought.
Dan

needhelp

1:05 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



ronin: i, too, have had loads of people tell us that they couldn't find us anymore in their keyword searches which they came to rely on, and were quite distraught! (yes, i know, relying on dynamic search results may not be so smart). they said they were so relieved when they finally found us again (adwords, friends, whatever). I just wonder why, when indexing fiascos occur, aren't my competitors being affected as dramatically as me (their sites aren't so "clean" and/or have multiple domains that are tricking searchers into believing they are shopping around when in fact they're wasting their time going to the same company). if you could only see, my site has so much more valuable info for people for my niche market...oh well!

otnot

1:10 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I have missed the dance since the rolling update began! I like to sit up all night and all day wondering where I will end up. Yea my sites are gone also but somehow the big G always comes through and fixes the problems. I have noticed that any title with a hyphen or hyphenated domain names are no where to be found. I have a buisnessname.com with no hyphens buy my title has a hyphen. If you add a hyphen to blue-widget search, I think you will find your index page where it belongs. Also google.de is showing most of my index pages now. Let's hope for a quick cure before Christmas.

PhilC

1:23 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



killipso. Your theory isn't correct. I have a domain URL page that hasn't changed in probably years, and has always ranked in the top 3 all that time, usually in the top 2, including through Dom and Esmer. Right now it's not in the top 1000 results (a little less 'cos Google won't provide 1000 results).

Like other people, I've found that with hyphens in the searchterm, it ranks where it always ranked - in the top 3. That's wierd.

Tropical Island

1:31 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



have noticed that any title with a hyphen or hyphenated domain names are no where to be found.

Just not so.

In our main keyword two of the top 10 domains have hyphanated urls and two have hyphanated titles. (207,000 results)

In another term 6 of the top 10 have titles with hyphens and 4 out of 10 have hyphens in the url. (239,000 results)

yvt360

1:33 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Continuing to dig...

I think this interesting. For a search I used to be #1 on, the top 10 or so links are all coming from Dmoz, they are identical down to the order in which they are listed.
something is not added in yet...I hope

jddux

1:35 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



never mind

[edited by: jddux at 1:38 am (utc) on Nov. 18, 2003]

seaboy

1:37 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Yes, I'm seeing the same thing if I put a hyphen in the search terms (between words that shouldn't be hyphenated, and aren't anywhere on the site) - my sites show up again.

This is really odd, I have a lot of unhappy clients today - they aren't even showing in the top 30 if you search for their names, eg 'Widget Town Resort & Spa' - we are not spamming in anyway, never have, and they all still have good PR.

Miop

1:43 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



if I do allintext, I come up 10 slots lower than I was originally, but the index page is not the up to date one...

Upheaval

1:44 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)



Just tried to Find Metropolitan Opera Tickets for my Mom's B-day on Google (by entering that phrase). 1st page, all spamming scalper junk selling tickets for 3 times the price. (Met opra tickets site was #11 on Page2) Finally got rid of the word "Tickets" (funny, cause Tickets were exactly what I was looking for) and the Met opera site appeared as #1.

Alta Vista: Met Opera ticket site #4 of non-sponsored results.

Pretty slick there!

rfgdxm1

1:45 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



One thing I find interesting. On certain SERPs very important to my sites, results on -in are *very* similar to pre-dance. Barely looks like a dance at all. What is notable about these SERPs is that they are essentially non-commercial, and thus nobody is actually trying spamming tricks. I'm about the only site in the top 100 who actually has considered SEO considerations. All quite white hat.

If Google was "broken" across the board, then I'd expect even non-competitive SERPs to also have great changes. All sites would have an equal chance of getting hit. Leading me to suspect that what is happening is by design. Any significant change in spam filters would tend to most influence competitive SERPs, and leave non-competitive ones alone (because these have little "spamminess.") Thus, consider the theory a lot of the moaning around here is due to people being whacked by spam filters. Note I am NOT necessarily calling these people spammers. They could be what the military euphemistically refers to as "collateral damage" in the Google War on Spam.

yvt360

1:48 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



upheaval-

Similar AltaVista rankings here, I am #1 for all my keywords there, and no where to be found on Google. Not quite Google though.

jady

1:51 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Strange! We have 4 clients in XYZ field in XYZ geographic area of Florida. ALL 4 are GONE from the serps for the geographic key-phrase - yet their page ranks remain high. Its not just sites WE created, it involved sites created by others. Not the search phrase targeting XYZ in this geographic area is cluttered with NO RELEVANT results but just directories and newspaper's! Whats going on Google?

P.S. One of the above meantioned sites only has the keyword usage 3 or 4 times on the index page and has been in #1 spot for 4 years straight!

Upheaval

1:55 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)



Yeah, yvt360.

And I'm number 2 on Alta

seaboy

1:59 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Jady - that is *exactly* what we are seeing. Searching for 'Widgettown hotels' brings up directories for some-other-town hotels, newspapers that mention 'widgettown hotels' in passing, etc.
I understand the need to fight spammers but these aren't even good results for Google users trying to find info.
Does anyone else here remember when AltaVista thought they were so big they could do what they liked with searches, however bad the results turned out to be for users, and they would stay the #1 SE?

deanril

2:06 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I remember, what are they now?

Also you cant keep preaching "white hat" then pull this crap when the christmas rush is coming or whenever you need to line your pockets. What you will intern recieve is "black hats" of your own creation.

That right google just made a whole new army of black hats on saturday, now googles problems are worse.

jady

2:06 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Seaboy - do you know how I realized this problem? (We are more of a development company with a smaller focus on marketing for these instances!) - my Mom called me and said, "Whats wrong with Google? I cant find what I am looking for - just junk!".

I then began to look and found a disaster.

I love Google, I live by it - but in general searches (not checking our Clients serps) I am finding a HUGE mess! I cant even find a local plummer anymore! ARGH!

deanril

2:10 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Last time Dominic we were told "just wait the searches will be better"

Whats the excuse this time? "The searches will be better-better"?

hostlead

2:10 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



that's cuz you spell it plumber not plummer.

HL

kittyheads

2:19 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Anyone seeing strange output on -cw? I just tried a keyword1 keyword2 search in one of the dance machines and got no results at -cw (and of course -sj still dead).

HarryM

2:21 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Using the dance tool, the only datacenter that shows my index page is datacenter 6.

Which one is that? Is there a reference somewhere which equates the numbers with the www-xx datacenters?

kittyheads

2:25 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Move the mouse over "Datacenter X" and you'll see the address in the lower left of the browser window.

HarryM

2:27 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Thanks, Kittyheads. I should have spotted that. My excuse is it's 2.30 in the morning here. :(

monsterisp

2:28 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Last time Dominic we were told "just wait the searches will be better"
Whats the excuse this time? "The searches will be better-better"?

that's cuz you spell it plumber not plummer.

I've heard that laughter can brighten a disastrous situation. Thank you for making me laugh during these rough times... :(

ewanfisher

2:31 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



This thread has become an interesting read. WW is where some of the top web people hang and and share ideas. But for the first time ever I am seeing lots of confused, angry and frustrated webmasters. I have to admit that for some searches the Google results are a mess. Datacenter's SERP's show sites moving up and down the rankings; coming and going.

I am reading articles all over the web about the Florida update. The most interesting one I read was titled:

Google ruins US Economy and the X-Mas Season -AP

Maybe this update will lead to the down fall of Google as people start to move onto another search engine, maybe the Google SERP's will get better... Only time will tell.

Maybe Google are updating to Red Hat Enterprise ;)

hostlead

2:34 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I've heard that laughter can brighten a disastrous situation. Thank you for making me laugh during these rough times... :(

no problem :)

ulysee

2:40 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



ewanfisher
for the first time ever I am seeing lots of confused, angry and frustrated webmasters.

I agree, but there were angry, confused, frustrted webmasters before but not like this!, this time the balance between good and bad comments has shifted dramatically.

rfgdxm1

2:42 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>I agree, but there were angry, confused, frustrted webmasters before but not like this!, this time the balance between good and bad comments has shifted dramatically.

Perhaps the happy members have just learned not to post in threads like this about their success, and sit back and smile. ;)

mfishy

2:48 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



back to the point. has anyone figured out a way to let the general searching public know that all searches must be performed with a hyphen? :)

mrbrad

2:49 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Dejavu!

Its update Domonic all over again. While reading this thread I feel like I stepped into a time machine taking me back to last May.

Didnt we learn anything from Domonic? Just like last time GoogleGuy has been saying over and over that not all the data has been incorporated yet. Yet webmasters still insist on predicting the demise of Google.

Guess what ... it didnt happen then, and it wont happen now!

jddux

2:50 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member


http://www.forbes.com/business/energy/newswire/2003/11/16/rtr1149649.html I think they are just driving up there profits before the IPO. Why, they know everyone will have to turn to google-ads since its right near christmas and so many businesses have google being a large part of their business plan.. Google is here to make money just like everyone else, it will probably kill them in the long run and another engine will become popular..

c1bernaught

2:51 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Which of the choices below will make the most money for a search engine business that sells advertising?

A.) An environment where an easy to understand, documented, algorythm allows those that can manipulate their web content correctly to rise to the top.

B.)An environment where only you know the algorythm but changes to the algorythm are made based purely on end user feedback.

C.)An environment where only you know the algorythm and you change that algorythm when and how you choose.

worker

2:54 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



It's pretty clear that the only way Google can remain the best search engine is if their ranking algorythms are constantly changing. If they don't change the way they do things, then gradually people will manipulate their search engine results.

By introducing significant changes, it will help to keep things more honest. If you knew that your site was basically stable in Google, then wouldn't you be tempted to make a little change and watch what happens, and then make another little change and watch what happens.

What if there were a place like WW where you could post your little changes, and the results. Guess what, other people would do the same, and little by little, the results would be based on little tricks and tweaks.

By adjusting things such that there is semi-chaos created and a sense of confusion on what does / doesn't work in Google, I think they are ensuring a long life.

Overall, I don't think Google has made too many huge mistakes, even though I've been as frustrated as everyone else here, on occassions.

[edited by: worker at 2:54 am (utc) on Nov. 18, 2003]

ulysee

2:54 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



rfgdxm1
Perhaps the happy members have just learned not to post in threads like this about their success, and sit back and smile.

So your saying the people in all of the seo forums followed the pattern of anger and the quiet of happiness?, I see angry, confused, frustrated, suicidal webmasters across all forums at least 70-80% majority. I have never seen this type of attitude about google rankings since I started {3 years ago} observing seo forums.

jddux

2:55 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



none, when the algorith is just a game to entertain us and you drive up the profits from ad-words

HarryM

2:56 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Is there any consensus on where we are on the update? Is there any more data to load? When will new PR show?

ILLstyle

3:02 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>> c1bernaught

I think googles goal is to provide quality search results.
so B
in the long run quality search results will keep google around and give it the ability to
make money long term.

kittyheads

3:03 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Just noticed a significant PR jump (1 to 4) ... wonder if it'll stick ...

rfgdxm1

3:04 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>So your saying the people in all of the seo forums followed the pattern of anger and the quiet of happiness?, I see angry, confused, frustrated, suicidal webmasters across all forums at least 70-80% majority. I have never seen this type of attitude about google rankings since I started {3 years ago} observing seo forums.

It could be considered rude to post of absolute delight and thanking the Google Gods amongst a bunch of the webmasters whose sites had the reverse fate, and are in angst. And consider that the content, confident, satisfied and pleased webmaster just doesn't have the emotional need to post as much as the angry, confused, frustrated, and suicidal webmaster. I still find it curious that all the test info SERPs I have checked looked good post update.

jddux

3:05 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



we just went from 6 to 7.. PLEASE be a good sign

ILLstyle

3:06 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



nice rfgdxm1

and thats why this thread is so long.

dazzlindonna

3:08 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



too bad we can't post specific search phrases on this forum. i'm sure we could create a nice long list for people who aren't seeing bad results to look at - just might change their minds. but...rules are rules.

kittyheads

3:10 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Looks like we're bouncing between the old and new PR. I'm sure that one of the senior members will zero in on the hot DC.

c1bernaught

3:10 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



jddux:

Incorrect-- the answer is C.)

Why? If only you know the aglorythm, and can change it a will. You can shake the serps anytime you want.

Why is that important? Well, it's because you can threaten the income of every online business.

Why is that important? Well, it's because these people, once threatened, look for stability.

Why is that important? Well, it's because paid advertisements are stable, as long as you are willing to pay.

jddux

3:12 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I just had another site that is new that we have been working on for 5 months go from a PR 1 to PR 5, could this be the beginning of somehting good?

kittyheads

3:14 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Backlinks updated on -zu.

jddux

3:16 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Im not saying that isnt the best idea for the company in the long term, I completely agree, but how can you say they didnt get greedy right before the company goes public? Sorry, but this is more than shaking up the algor a little.. Which is what they have always done and have kept them successfull, hopefully none of this matters anymore but all my page ranks are jumpin up like crazy

ewanfisher

3:18 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Backlinks updated on -zu.

www-va showing them too with the new Google backlinks being 299,000.

steveb

3:24 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Whoa, the -va backlinks are very different than what was shown two days ago, or what has been showing for the past two weeks (or two hours ago for that matter), definte change here.

==
yahoo at 762k

[edited by: steveb at 3:25 am (utc) on Nov. 18, 2003]

kittyheads

3:24 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Agreed, ewanfisher. Setting toolbarqueries to -va in HOSTS file now showing updated PR consistently.

c1bernaught

3:25 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Cool... I found the index page of my top site. It's been top 10 for about a year. Clean, lot's of information, lots of content.

Oh yeah! Just found that baby on page 13... that's right from top 10 page 1 to page 13...

Good Times!

ewanfisher

3:25 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



SERP's are starting to make a bit more sense that have the new backlinks. Anyone else seeing this?

rfgdxm1

3:26 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



PR is definitely updating across the board. Hmm...looks like my sites survived the PR update, and from PR increase in some internal pages this is an improvement.

caveman

3:27 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



If Google was "broken" across the board, then I'd expect even non-competitive SERPs to also have great changes. All sites would have an equal chance of getting hit. Leading me to suspect that what is happening is by design.

Yes, this is an all out attack on:
A) spammers,
B) affiliate sites, or,
C) both.

There are plenty of sites with affiliate links that are not spammers. There are even more affiliate sites that are somewhat or very spammy. I hope G is going after spammers and not all affilate sites. Either way, there seems to be a lot of collateral damage.

Why are people posting before it's done? To let G know this update so far has problems. It takes a while - especially when minutes can seem like days as is currently the case - but always in the past G got the message. I'll keep assuming that will be true again, until G proves otherwise. If and when G lets the good guys down, there will be hell to pay. It's theirs to lose and so far they haven't lost it.

steveb

3:28 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



PR updated on -va

216.239.37.100

ewanfisher

3:29 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Google seems to be counting a lot more of the internal links now which would explain the whole "big sites doing better" theory.

kittyheads

3:32 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Noticing that this backlink update does not include the Google Directory link that we got after the recent Directory update. A little disappointing, but at least there's something to look forward to.

ulysee

3:32 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



It could be considered rude to post of absolute delight and thanking the Google Gods amongst a bunch of the webmasters whose sites had the reverse fate, and are in angst. And consider that the content, confident, satisfied and pleased webmaster just doesn't have the emotional need to post as much as the angry, confused, frustrated, and suicidal webmaster. I still find it curious that all the test info SERPs I have checked looked good post update.

That's fine but we do not work in the same industry {adult}. Google is not God if it were all serps would be 100% correct in all industries but they are not. Google has made it perfectly clear that zero and duplicate content zero backlinks, doorway pages are legitamite ways to achieve top spots for competitive terms. I wish not to accomplish top rankings by cheating but I guess have to now to survive.

[edited by: ulysee at 3:34 am (utc) on Nov. 18, 2003]

rfgdxm1

3:32 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>There are plenty of sites with affiliate links that are not spammers. There are even more affiliate sites that are somewhat or very spammy. I hope G is going after spammers and not all affilate sites. Either way, there seems to be a lot of collateral damage.

Interesting theory. How many here have been creamed that have no affiliate links, and also are not spammers?

vbjaeger

3:35 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



SERP's are starting to make a bit more sense that have the new backlinks. Anyone else seeing this?

I am seeing that our PR went up from 5 to 6, and that our backlinks ahve gone from 61 to 82. Yet we still got moved from top 5 position to mid 50s. It does not make any sense yet, but obviously the update isnt over,...so I am hoping the backlink and PR update means something good is coming.

rfgdxm1

3:36 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>That's fine but we do not work in the same industry {adult}. Google is not God if it were all serps would be 100% correct in all industries but they are not. Google has made it perfectly clear that zero and duplicate content zero backlinks, doorway pages are legitamite ways to achieve top spots for competitive terms. I wish not to accomplish top rankings by cheating but I guess have to to survive.

I wouldn't be surprised that Google has just thrown in the towel when it comes to adult sites. Trying to keep up with the spam in that area is something that they may consider to be economically unfeasible.

ewanfisher

3:37 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



vbjaeger: whats your competition like thats ranking above you in the *new* SERP's?

jddux

3:37 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



When our site first got good rankings, our page rank went up a day or two before our site it shot to the top..

synergy

3:43 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Noticing that this backlink update does not include the Google Directory link that we got after the recent Directory update. A little disappointing, but at least there's something to look forward to.

The updated G directory has shown my link with the new PR since saturday :P

James_Dale

3:44 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



VBJAEGER-

I also see a toolbar PR update now!...hmmm...wasn't there one last week too?

I've climbed up to PR7!, but my ranking has dropped by more than a hundred results.

And finally, maybe one of the strangest things I've seen for a while: on some DCs I show PR5, on some I show PR6, and on some I show PR7. I have never seen 3 different PR scores listed across DCs for the same site.

[edited by: James_Dale at 3:49 am (utc) on Nov. 18, 2003]

customdy

3:45 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Back to the keyword1-keyword2 search.. something interesting, not sure what it means...

if you search keyword1-keyword2 and look at the highlighted words in the SERPS, google only highlights:
keyword1 keyword2 it would not highlight keyword1 keyword3 keyword2

if you search keyword1 keyword2 and look at the highlighted words in the SERPs, google will highlight every occurance of keyword1 and keyword2

Could there be some sort of pentaly for over optimizing keywords?

rfgdxm1

3:49 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>I've climbed up to PR7!, but my ranking has dropped by more than a hundred results.

But that extra green in the toolbar may impress those few who find your site. Yeah, I know. REALLY bad humor.

polarmate

3:51 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hate to do this: can someone point me to the thread/posts where it shows you how to check your PR across servers. Something to do with my hosts file...much obliged! tks!

deanril

3:52 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Since my white has turned black now........ James_Dale care to sell a link?

Just kidding!

customdy

3:52 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The site that took over our #2 spot has a PR of 0, I would trade my PR of 4 for 0 if it got us back... The site that took over #2 is displaying Google AdSense Ads, maybe that it is :)

James_Dale

3:53 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



No probs, this update is keeping me entertained if nothing else :)

Would be very odd indeed though, if Google decided to keep a PR7 site optimized for a 200,000 competing results phrase, buried on page 16 of the SERPs. I don't see any site above me with PR as high as 7.

[edited by: James_Dale at 3:56 am (utc) on Nov. 18, 2003]

HarryM

3:55 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Noticing that this backlink update does not include the Google Directory link that we got after the recent Directory update

Same here. Google's cache of the Google Directory page my site is listed on is older than the one showing before the update. Also several of the recently indexed pages are missing. It seems a chunk of recent data has fallen into limbo.

geegee

3:55 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)



Yeah the keyword1-keyword2 thing is strange, why would it show results as they where before the update? (At least in my case, can't speak for all).

So that's the secret real index! eheh trying to convince myself everything is ok....lol

customdy

4:07 am on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Yes, I get exactly the same top 10 prior to the update with keyword1-keyword2, exactly, no changes..
This 933 message thread spans 13 pages: 933